基于vmware虚拟化环境下存储性能的三层缓存方案性能评价

Marcel
{"title":"基于vmware虚拟化环境下存储性能的三层缓存方案性能评价","authors":"Marcel","doi":"10.1109/ICSGTEIS.2018.8709113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Caching mechanism was one of the solution to leverage storage performance in a virtualized environment. We can categorize it into 3 large groups based on its implementation target, we call it as 3 layers’ perspective or approach because it represents 3 layers of a virtualization platform. Testing of the storage performance using the cache approaches was performed using Crystal Disk Mark as the workload tool and additionally, we also measure time duration of clone process for a single VM. The experimental tests result showed that the approach offered by the second layer approach provides the greatest performance impact for read-and-write when compared to baseline performance (conditions without cache at all); performance result in sequence when compared with the baseline score for bandwidth and IO: 4K-Q8T8 has about 50,92 times higher score for read and 46,01 times higher score for write operations; 4K-Q32TI has about 8,1 times higher score for read and 7,74 times higher score for write operations; while 4K-QITI has about 54,54 times higher score for read and 28,75 times higher score for write operations. Additionally, for clone process, it was about 2,02 times faster in time duration than baseline. We also performed multi-layer test of the 3 layers; the top performance was obtained from the combination of second and third layer cache’s approaches, we got impressive bandwidth and IO score when compared with the baseline: 4K-Q8T8 has about 192,1 times higher score for read and 118,01 times higher score for write operations; 4K-Q32TI has about 38,92 times higher score for read and 10,59 times higher score for write operations; while 4K-QITI has about 247,92 higher score for read and 64,28 times higher score for write operations.","PeriodicalId":438615,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Smart Green Technology in Electrical and Information Systems (ICSGTEIS)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of Caching Solution from Three Layers Perspective for Storage Performance in VMware-based Virtualization Environment\",\"authors\":\"Marcel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSGTEIS.2018.8709113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Caching mechanism was one of the solution to leverage storage performance in a virtualized environment. We can categorize it into 3 large groups based on its implementation target, we call it as 3 layers’ perspective or approach because it represents 3 layers of a virtualization platform. Testing of the storage performance using the cache approaches was performed using Crystal Disk Mark as the workload tool and additionally, we also measure time duration of clone process for a single VM. The experimental tests result showed that the approach offered by the second layer approach provides the greatest performance impact for read-and-write when compared to baseline performance (conditions without cache at all); performance result in sequence when compared with the baseline score for bandwidth and IO: 4K-Q8T8 has about 50,92 times higher score for read and 46,01 times higher score for write operations; 4K-Q32TI has about 8,1 times higher score for read and 7,74 times higher score for write operations; while 4K-QITI has about 54,54 times higher score for read and 28,75 times higher score for write operations. Additionally, for clone process, it was about 2,02 times faster in time duration than baseline. We also performed multi-layer test of the 3 layers; the top performance was obtained from the combination of second and third layer cache’s approaches, we got impressive bandwidth and IO score when compared with the baseline: 4K-Q8T8 has about 192,1 times higher score for read and 118,01 times higher score for write operations; 4K-Q32TI has about 38,92 times higher score for read and 10,59 times higher score for write operations; while 4K-QITI has about 247,92 higher score for read and 64,28 times higher score for write operations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 International Conference on Smart Green Technology in Electrical and Information Systems (ICSGTEIS)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 International Conference on Smart Green Technology in Electrical and Information Systems (ICSGTEIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSGTEIS.2018.8709113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Smart Green Technology in Electrical and Information Systems (ICSGTEIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSGTEIS.2018.8709113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

缓存机制是在虚拟化环境中利用存储性能的解决方案之一。根据其实现目标,我们可以将其分为3大类,我们称之为3层视角或方法,因为它代表了虚拟化平台的3层。使用Crystal Disk Mark作为工作负载工具对使用缓存方法的存储性能进行了测试,此外,我们还测量了单个VM的克隆过程的持续时间。实验测试结果表明,与基线性能(完全没有缓存的情况下)相比,第二层方法提供的方法对读写性能的影响最大;与带宽和IO的基准分数相比,4K-Q8T8的性能结果依次为:读分数高约50.92倍,写分数高约46.01倍;4K-Q32TI的读操作和写操作的得分分别高出约8.1倍和7.74倍;而4K-QITI在读操作上的得分是前者的54.54倍,在写操作上的得分是后者的28.75倍。此外,对于克隆过程,其持续时间比基线快了约0.02倍。我们还对3层进行了多层检验;第二层和第三层缓存方法的结合获得了最高的性能,与基线相比,我们获得了令人印象深刻的带宽和IO分数:4K-Q8T8的读操作分数大约高出192,1倍,写操作分数高出118,01倍;4K-Q32TI的读和写操作得分分别高出38.92倍和10.59倍;而4K-QITI在读操作上的得分高出247.92倍,在写操作上的得分高出64.28倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Evaluation of Caching Solution from Three Layers Perspective for Storage Performance in VMware-based Virtualization Environment
Caching mechanism was one of the solution to leverage storage performance in a virtualized environment. We can categorize it into 3 large groups based on its implementation target, we call it as 3 layers’ perspective or approach because it represents 3 layers of a virtualization platform. Testing of the storage performance using the cache approaches was performed using Crystal Disk Mark as the workload tool and additionally, we also measure time duration of clone process for a single VM. The experimental tests result showed that the approach offered by the second layer approach provides the greatest performance impact for read-and-write when compared to baseline performance (conditions without cache at all); performance result in sequence when compared with the baseline score for bandwidth and IO: 4K-Q8T8 has about 50,92 times higher score for read and 46,01 times higher score for write operations; 4K-Q32TI has about 8,1 times higher score for read and 7,74 times higher score for write operations; while 4K-QITI has about 54,54 times higher score for read and 28,75 times higher score for write operations. Additionally, for clone process, it was about 2,02 times faster in time duration than baseline. We also performed multi-layer test of the 3 layers; the top performance was obtained from the combination of second and third layer cache’s approaches, we got impressive bandwidth and IO score when compared with the baseline: 4K-Q8T8 has about 192,1 times higher score for read and 118,01 times higher score for write operations; 4K-Q32TI has about 38,92 times higher score for read and 10,59 times higher score for write operations; while 4K-QITI has about 247,92 higher score for read and 64,28 times higher score for write operations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信