{"title":"中医治疗功能失调性子宫出血的系统评价","authors":"W. Meng","doi":"10.23880/ipcm-16000146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of Chinese medicine in treating dysfunctional uterine bleeding via a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Clinical trials of Chinese medicine treating dysfunctional uterine bleeding were retrieved with specific search strategy in the following databases: CNKI (from 1994 to December 2016), Wan Fang (from 1980 to December 2016), Pro Quest Medical Database (from 1980 to December 2016), MEDLINE (from 1950 to December 2016) and PUBMED (from 1980 to December 2016). Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTS) were selected with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of trials was accessed by the risk of bias assessment tool. Data was extracted into Excel and analyzed by Software Rev Man 5.3. Result: A total of 21 RCTs were included with 2167 patients. The meta-analysis showed that the Chinese medicine group had higher recovery rate than that of the Western medicine group [OR=2.26, 95% CI (1.86, 2.74), P<0.00001]. The effectiveness of Chinese medicine was superior to the Western medicine [OR=3.93, 95% CI (2.99, 5.169), P<0.00001]. There were no significant difference in bleeding arrest in 3 days [OR=0.90, 95% CI (0.49, 1.63), P=0.73] and in 10 days [OR=1.40, 95% CI (0.80, 2.44), P=0.24] between Chinese medicine group and Western medicine group. Few side effects were observed in the Chinese medicine group [OR=0.04, 95% CI (0.01, 0.11), P<0.0001]. The Chinese medicine group also had a lower recurrence rate than that of Western medicine group [OR=0.16, 95% CI (0.06, 0.47), P=0.0008]. Conclusion: Chinese medicine appears to have better overall clinical effect in treating dysfunctional uterine bleeding with less side effects and lower chance of recurrence. However, the quality of the included studies needs to be improved; the findings should be interpreted with caution. Further large-scale, rigorously designed trials are warranted to confirm the findings.","PeriodicalId":298121,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacognosy & Chinese Medicine","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review of Chinese Medicine for the Treatment of Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding\",\"authors\":\"W. Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/ipcm-16000146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of Chinese medicine in treating dysfunctional uterine bleeding via a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Clinical trials of Chinese medicine treating dysfunctional uterine bleeding were retrieved with specific search strategy in the following databases: CNKI (from 1994 to December 2016), Wan Fang (from 1980 to December 2016), Pro Quest Medical Database (from 1980 to December 2016), MEDLINE (from 1950 to December 2016) and PUBMED (from 1980 to December 2016). Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTS) were selected with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of trials was accessed by the risk of bias assessment tool. Data was extracted into Excel and analyzed by Software Rev Man 5.3. Result: A total of 21 RCTs were included with 2167 patients. The meta-analysis showed that the Chinese medicine group had higher recovery rate than that of the Western medicine group [OR=2.26, 95% CI (1.86, 2.74), P<0.00001]. The effectiveness of Chinese medicine was superior to the Western medicine [OR=3.93, 95% CI (2.99, 5.169), P<0.00001]. There were no significant difference in bleeding arrest in 3 days [OR=0.90, 95% CI (0.49, 1.63), P=0.73] and in 10 days [OR=1.40, 95% CI (0.80, 2.44), P=0.24] between Chinese medicine group and Western medicine group. Few side effects were observed in the Chinese medicine group [OR=0.04, 95% CI (0.01, 0.11), P<0.0001]. The Chinese medicine group also had a lower recurrence rate than that of Western medicine group [OR=0.16, 95% CI (0.06, 0.47), P=0.0008]. Conclusion: Chinese medicine appears to have better overall clinical effect in treating dysfunctional uterine bleeding with less side effects and lower chance of recurrence. However, the quality of the included studies needs to be improved; the findings should be interpreted with caution. Further large-scale, rigorously designed trials are warranted to confirm the findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pharmacognosy & Chinese Medicine\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pharmacognosy & Chinese Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/ipcm-16000146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacognosy & Chinese Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/ipcm-16000146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:通过系统评价和荟萃分析,评价中药治疗功能失调性子宫出血的疗效。方法:采用特定的检索策略,检索CNKI(1994 - 2016年12月)、万方(1980 - 2016年12月)、Pro Quest医学数据库(1980 - 2016年12月)、MEDLINE(1950 - 2016年12月)和PUBMED(1980 - 2016年12月)中有关中药治疗功能失调性子宫出血的临床试验。选择符合纳入和排除标准的随机对照试验(RCTS)。试验质量通过偏倚风险评估工具进行评估。数据提取到Excel中,用Software Rev Man 5.3进行分析。结果:共纳入21项rct, 2167例患者。荟萃分析显示,中药组的康复率高于西药组[OR=2.26, 95% CI (1.86, 2.74), P<0.00001]。中药的疗效优于西药[OR=3.93, 95% CI (2.99, 5.169), P<0.00001]。中药组与西药组在3 d及10 d止血停搏方面差异无统计学意义[OR=0.90, 95% CI (0.49, 1.63), P=0.73],差异无统计学意义[OR=1.40, 95% CI (0.80, 2.44), P=0.24]。中药组不良反应较少[OR=0.04, 95% CI (0.01, 0.11), P<0.0001]。中药组复发率也低于西药组[OR=0.16, 95% CI (0.06, 0.47), P=0.0008]。结论:中药治疗功能失调性子宫出血整体临床效果较好,副作用少,复发率低。然而,纳入研究的质量有待提高;研究结果应谨慎解读。进一步的大规模、严格设计的试验有必要证实这些发现。
Systematic Review of Chinese Medicine for the Treatment of Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of Chinese medicine in treating dysfunctional uterine bleeding via a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Clinical trials of Chinese medicine treating dysfunctional uterine bleeding were retrieved with specific search strategy in the following databases: CNKI (from 1994 to December 2016), Wan Fang (from 1980 to December 2016), Pro Quest Medical Database (from 1980 to December 2016), MEDLINE (from 1950 to December 2016) and PUBMED (from 1980 to December 2016). Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTS) were selected with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of trials was accessed by the risk of bias assessment tool. Data was extracted into Excel and analyzed by Software Rev Man 5.3. Result: A total of 21 RCTs were included with 2167 patients. The meta-analysis showed that the Chinese medicine group had higher recovery rate than that of the Western medicine group [OR=2.26, 95% CI (1.86, 2.74), P<0.00001]. The effectiveness of Chinese medicine was superior to the Western medicine [OR=3.93, 95% CI (2.99, 5.169), P<0.00001]. There were no significant difference in bleeding arrest in 3 days [OR=0.90, 95% CI (0.49, 1.63), P=0.73] and in 10 days [OR=1.40, 95% CI (0.80, 2.44), P=0.24] between Chinese medicine group and Western medicine group. Few side effects were observed in the Chinese medicine group [OR=0.04, 95% CI (0.01, 0.11), P<0.0001]. The Chinese medicine group also had a lower recurrence rate than that of Western medicine group [OR=0.16, 95% CI (0.06, 0.47), P=0.0008]. Conclusion: Chinese medicine appears to have better overall clinical effect in treating dysfunctional uterine bleeding with less side effects and lower chance of recurrence. However, the quality of the included studies needs to be improved; the findings should be interpreted with caution. Further large-scale, rigorously designed trials are warranted to confirm the findings.