关于“限变换脉冲”和光强自相关的评述

J. Chi
{"title":"关于“限变换脉冲”和光强自相关的评述","authors":"J. Chi","doi":"10.1109/CSNDSP.2016.7573954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cleanness of fast optical pulses, especially those transmitted through optical communication networks, is overwhelmingly referenced to and judged by the so-called “transform-limited pulse”, i.e., pulses with full-width at half-maximum (FWHM)-defined time-bandwidth product around 0.5. In this paper, we will demonstrate the fundamental flaw of this notion using our simulation results. Moreover, the pulse width is usually obtained by optical intensity autocorrelation plus curve-fitting, which may be misleading as well. Consequently, these standard methods of pulse characterization should be thoroughly re-considered.","PeriodicalId":298711,"journal":{"name":"2016 10th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comments on “transform-limited pulse” and optical intensity autocorrelation\",\"authors\":\"J. Chi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSNDSP.2016.7573954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The cleanness of fast optical pulses, especially those transmitted through optical communication networks, is overwhelmingly referenced to and judged by the so-called “transform-limited pulse”, i.e., pulses with full-width at half-maximum (FWHM)-defined time-bandwidth product around 0.5. In this paper, we will demonstrate the fundamental flaw of this notion using our simulation results. Moreover, the pulse width is usually obtained by optical intensity autocorrelation plus curve-fitting, which may be misleading as well. Consequently, these standard methods of pulse characterization should be thoroughly re-considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 10th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 10th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSNDSP.2016.7573954\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 10th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSNDSP.2016.7573954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

快速光脉冲的清洁度,特别是通过光通信网络传输的脉冲,绝大多数是由所谓的“变换限制脉冲”来参考和判断的,即半最大全宽(FWHM)定义的时间带宽积在0.5左右的脉冲。在本文中,我们将使用我们的模拟结果来证明这个概念的基本缺陷。此外,脉冲宽度通常是由光强自相关加曲线拟合得到的,这也容易产生误导。因此,这些标准的脉冲表征方法应该彻底重新考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comments on “transform-limited pulse” and optical intensity autocorrelation
The cleanness of fast optical pulses, especially those transmitted through optical communication networks, is overwhelmingly referenced to and judged by the so-called “transform-limited pulse”, i.e., pulses with full-width at half-maximum (FWHM)-defined time-bandwidth product around 0.5. In this paper, we will demonstrate the fundamental flaw of this notion using our simulation results. Moreover, the pulse width is usually obtained by optical intensity autocorrelation plus curve-fitting, which may be misleading as well. Consequently, these standard methods of pulse characterization should be thoroughly re-considered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信