{"title":"关于“限变换脉冲”和光强自相关的评述","authors":"J. Chi","doi":"10.1109/CSNDSP.2016.7573954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cleanness of fast optical pulses, especially those transmitted through optical communication networks, is overwhelmingly referenced to and judged by the so-called “transform-limited pulse”, i.e., pulses with full-width at half-maximum (FWHM)-defined time-bandwidth product around 0.5. In this paper, we will demonstrate the fundamental flaw of this notion using our simulation results. Moreover, the pulse width is usually obtained by optical intensity autocorrelation plus curve-fitting, which may be misleading as well. Consequently, these standard methods of pulse characterization should be thoroughly re-considered.","PeriodicalId":298711,"journal":{"name":"2016 10th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comments on “transform-limited pulse” and optical intensity autocorrelation\",\"authors\":\"J. Chi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSNDSP.2016.7573954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The cleanness of fast optical pulses, especially those transmitted through optical communication networks, is overwhelmingly referenced to and judged by the so-called “transform-limited pulse”, i.e., pulses with full-width at half-maximum (FWHM)-defined time-bandwidth product around 0.5. In this paper, we will demonstrate the fundamental flaw of this notion using our simulation results. Moreover, the pulse width is usually obtained by optical intensity autocorrelation plus curve-fitting, which may be misleading as well. Consequently, these standard methods of pulse characterization should be thoroughly re-considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 10th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 10th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSNDSP.2016.7573954\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 10th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSNDSP.2016.7573954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comments on “transform-limited pulse” and optical intensity autocorrelation
The cleanness of fast optical pulses, especially those transmitted through optical communication networks, is overwhelmingly referenced to and judged by the so-called “transform-limited pulse”, i.e., pulses with full-width at half-maximum (FWHM)-defined time-bandwidth product around 0.5. In this paper, we will demonstrate the fundamental flaw of this notion using our simulation results. Moreover, the pulse width is usually obtained by optical intensity autocorrelation plus curve-fitting, which may be misleading as well. Consequently, these standard methods of pulse characterization should be thoroughly re-considered.