弯腰、深蹲和跪举时腰椎负荷:肌肉骨骼模型分析

Arjaree Ausavanonkulporn, K. Areekul, W. Senavongse, C. Sukjamsri
{"title":"弯腰、深蹲和跪举时腰椎负荷:肌肉骨骼模型分析","authors":"Arjaree Ausavanonkulporn, K. Areekul, W. Senavongse, C. Sukjamsri","doi":"10.1145/3326172.3326210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pain at the lower back is a common health problem affecting working-age population around the world. The risk of low back pain has been assessed through spinal loads that change across different postures. Lifting is the most frequent posture that has been studied in previous literature. However, it is unclear which lifting posture should be performed in order to decrease the incidence of low back pain. The objective of this study was to evaluate spinal loads for three different lifting techniques; stoop, squat, and kneeling, at several levels of the lumbar spine. The present study was conducted via musculoskeletal modeling using commercial software (AnyBody Technology). The results indicate that there was no significant difference in compressive and resultant force among the three liftings. However, the difference in shear force between stoop and kneeling lifting was found to be significant. Increasing level of the lumbar spine significantly led to the decrease of shear force. The findings should benefit various research studies dealing with LBP.","PeriodicalId":293245,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 9th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Technology - ICBET' 19","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lumbar Spinal Loading during Stoop, Squat, and Kneeling Lifting: A Musculoskeletal Modeling Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Arjaree Ausavanonkulporn, K. Areekul, W. Senavongse, C. Sukjamsri\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3326172.3326210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pain at the lower back is a common health problem affecting working-age population around the world. The risk of low back pain has been assessed through spinal loads that change across different postures. Lifting is the most frequent posture that has been studied in previous literature. However, it is unclear which lifting posture should be performed in order to decrease the incidence of low back pain. The objective of this study was to evaluate spinal loads for three different lifting techniques; stoop, squat, and kneeling, at several levels of the lumbar spine. The present study was conducted via musculoskeletal modeling using commercial software (AnyBody Technology). The results indicate that there was no significant difference in compressive and resultant force among the three liftings. However, the difference in shear force between stoop and kneeling lifting was found to be significant. Increasing level of the lumbar spine significantly led to the decrease of shear force. The findings should benefit various research studies dealing with LBP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":293245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 9th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Technology - ICBET' 19\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 9th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Technology - ICBET' 19\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3326172.3326210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 9th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Technology - ICBET' 19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3326172.3326210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下背部疼痛是影响世界各地劳动年龄人口的常见健康问题。腰痛的风险是通过不同姿势的脊柱负荷变化来评估的。举重是以前文献中研究过的最常见的姿势。然而,目前还不清楚应该采取哪种姿势来减少腰痛的发生率。本研究的目的是评估三种不同的举重技术的脊柱负荷;在腰椎的几个部位进行弯腰、深蹲和跪地。本研究使用商业软件(任何人技术)通过肌肉骨骼建模进行。结果表明,三种提升方式的压缩力和合力没有显著差异。然而,发现弯腰和跪举之间的剪切力差异是显著的。腰椎水平升高导致腰椎剪切力明显降低。这些发现应该有利于处理LBP的各种研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lumbar Spinal Loading during Stoop, Squat, and Kneeling Lifting: A Musculoskeletal Modeling Analysis
Pain at the lower back is a common health problem affecting working-age population around the world. The risk of low back pain has been assessed through spinal loads that change across different postures. Lifting is the most frequent posture that has been studied in previous literature. However, it is unclear which lifting posture should be performed in order to decrease the incidence of low back pain. The objective of this study was to evaluate spinal loads for three different lifting techniques; stoop, squat, and kneeling, at several levels of the lumbar spine. The present study was conducted via musculoskeletal modeling using commercial software (AnyBody Technology). The results indicate that there was no significant difference in compressive and resultant force among the three liftings. However, the difference in shear force between stoop and kneeling lifting was found to be significant. Increasing level of the lumbar spine significantly led to the decrease of shear force. The findings should benefit various research studies dealing with LBP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信