{"title":"PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN BANDWIDTH PADA PRODUK HOME IDPLAY","authors":"Retno Apriyani Tijas, Arikha Saputra","doi":"10.24269/ls.v7i1.5605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many Indonesian people use internet services, one of which is by registering for installation at home from the company PT. Trans Indonesia Supercorridor, this company is a solution to access broadband internet connection. One of the products from PT. Trans Indonesia Supercorridor is a product of Idplay. Some consumers intentionally default on PT. Trans Indonesia Supercorridor by reason of wanting to seek more profit with not much capital, such as reselling the internet it uses to other people, where in the agreement consumers are prohibited from reselling it to other people. The research method used is normative legal research. Based on the specifications of this paper which uses an in concerto research method, the data analysis used is a qualitative approach to secondary data, which means that it includes the content and structure of positive law. Protection carried out by PT. Trans Indonesia Supercorridor (TIS). namely preventive protection such as by reprimanding Mr. X, then PT.TIS also performs repressive protection, namely by terminating Mr. X's internet cable network. The form of sanctions given by PT.TIS to consumers is to ask for compensation by make payments due to bandwidth abuse, but if consumers cannot make compensation in the form of payments according to the amount of losses suffered by PT. TIS then the action taken by PT.TIS is to withdraw the device (ONU) to the consumer.","PeriodicalId":193148,"journal":{"name":"Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v7i1.5605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
许多印尼人使用互联网服务,其中之一是在PT. Trans Indonesia Supercorridor公司注册安装,该公司是接入宽带互联网连接的解决方案。PT. Trans Indonesia超级走廊的产品之一是Idplay的产品。一些消费者故意违约PT. Trans Indonesia Supercorridor,因为他们想用不多的资金寻求更多的利润,比如将其使用的互联网转售给其他人,而在协议中,消费者被禁止将其转售给其他人。本文采用的研究方法是规范法研究。根据本文采用的协奏曲研究方法的规范,所使用的数据分析是对二手数据的定性分析,这意味着它包括了实证法的内容和结构。由PT. Trans Indonesia超级走廊(TIS)提供保护。即预防性保护,如谴责X先生,那么PT.TIS也进行压制性保护,即终止X先生的互联网有线网络。PT.TIS对消费者的制裁形式是由于带宽滥用而要求以付款的方式进行赔偿,但如果消费者不能按照PT.TIS遭受的损失金额以付款的方式进行赔偿,那么PT.TIS采取的行动是将设备(ONU)收回给消费者。
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN BANDWIDTH PADA PRODUK HOME IDPLAY
Many Indonesian people use internet services, one of which is by registering for installation at home from the company PT. Trans Indonesia Supercorridor, this company is a solution to access broadband internet connection. One of the products from PT. Trans Indonesia Supercorridor is a product of Idplay. Some consumers intentionally default on PT. Trans Indonesia Supercorridor by reason of wanting to seek more profit with not much capital, such as reselling the internet it uses to other people, where in the agreement consumers are prohibited from reselling it to other people. The research method used is normative legal research. Based on the specifications of this paper which uses an in concerto research method, the data analysis used is a qualitative approach to secondary data, which means that it includes the content and structure of positive law. Protection carried out by PT. Trans Indonesia Supercorridor (TIS). namely preventive protection such as by reprimanding Mr. X, then PT.TIS also performs repressive protection, namely by terminating Mr. X's internet cable network. The form of sanctions given by PT.TIS to consumers is to ask for compensation by make payments due to bandwidth abuse, but if consumers cannot make compensation in the form of payments according to the amount of losses suffered by PT. TIS then the action taken by PT.TIS is to withdraw the device (ONU) to the consumer.