{"title":"锚定不是假阳性:Maniadis, Tufano和List's (2014)“复制失败”实际上与原始版本完全一致","authors":"U. Simonsohn, J. Simmons, Leif D. Nelson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2351926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We revisit a recent failure-to-replicate the finding that arbitrary anchors influence monetary valuations. Though in the replication the point estimate is indeed not significantly different from zero, it is also not significantly different from a sizable effect. This is partially explained by a high share of valuations near $0 in the replication, causing a floor effect and augmenting the impact of rounding error. P-curve analysis of the original paper overwhelmingly rejects the possibility that the evidence for anchoring effects is false-positive..","PeriodicalId":443127,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Marketing eJournal","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anchoring is Not a False-Positive: Maniadis, Tufano, and List's (2014) 'Failure-to-Replicate' is Actually Entirely Consistent with the Original\",\"authors\":\"U. Simonsohn, J. Simmons, Leif D. Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2351926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We revisit a recent failure-to-replicate the finding that arbitrary anchors influence monetary valuations. Though in the replication the point estimate is indeed not significantly different from zero, it is also not significantly different from a sizable effect. This is partially explained by a high share of valuations near $0 in the replication, causing a floor effect and augmenting the impact of rounding error. P-curve analysis of the original paper overwhelmingly rejects the possibility that the evidence for anchoring effects is false-positive..\",\"PeriodicalId\":443127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Marketing eJournal\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Marketing eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2351926\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Marketing eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2351926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anchoring is Not a False-Positive: Maniadis, Tufano, and List's (2014) 'Failure-to-Replicate' is Actually Entirely Consistent with the Original
We revisit a recent failure-to-replicate the finding that arbitrary anchors influence monetary valuations. Though in the replication the point estimate is indeed not significantly different from zero, it is also not significantly different from a sizable effect. This is partially explained by a high share of valuations near $0 in the replication, causing a floor effect and augmenting the impact of rounding error. P-curve analysis of the original paper overwhelmingly rejects the possibility that the evidence for anchoring effects is false-positive..