数字人文与宗教研究:一个“为什么”指南

Christopher D. Cantwell, Kristian Petersen
{"title":"数字人文与宗教研究:一个“为什么”指南","authors":"Christopher D. Cantwell, Kristian Petersen","doi":"10.1515/9783110573022-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2018, the American Academy of Religion hosted a special “wildcard” panel on digital research and teaching projects that encourage students to engage with their local communities. Titled “Teaching Local Religion with Digital Humanities: Objects, Methods, Pedagogies,” the session featured ten educators who contributed to eight different projects. Some of the projects were based at major research universities and worked with communities across the country. Others were housed at small liberal arts colleges and focused on one place of worship. But almost all of the projects connected with the scholars’ research agenda and employed the tools and methods of digital humanities (DH) in order to benefit from the work of student collaborators.1 Despite the panel’s explicit focus on teaching, the question and answer session that followed forayed into other matters. The very first question from the audience asked how—or even if—such projects counted in tenure and promotion portfolios. Another wondered how the projects’ directors received credit for their work. Finally, one audience members seemed to question the entire premise of the panel altogether, asking whether the time spent developing these projects would be better spent producing journal articles or monographs. Such questions are important ones. They get at some of the tensions around integrating digital scholarship into the academic study of religion. But they also missed the point of the session.While the presenters were eager to talk about the pedagogical and intellectual benefits they had gained by employing digital methods, the audience was concerned with the professional issues that surround digital work.","PeriodicalId":218193,"journal":{"name":"Digital Humanities and Research Methods in Religious Studies","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Humanities and Religious Studies: A “Why” To Guide\",\"authors\":\"Christopher D. Cantwell, Kristian Petersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110573022-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2018, the American Academy of Religion hosted a special “wildcard” panel on digital research and teaching projects that encourage students to engage with their local communities. Titled “Teaching Local Religion with Digital Humanities: Objects, Methods, Pedagogies,” the session featured ten educators who contributed to eight different projects. Some of the projects were based at major research universities and worked with communities across the country. Others were housed at small liberal arts colleges and focused on one place of worship. But almost all of the projects connected with the scholars’ research agenda and employed the tools and methods of digital humanities (DH) in order to benefit from the work of student collaborators.1 Despite the panel’s explicit focus on teaching, the question and answer session that followed forayed into other matters. The very first question from the audience asked how—or even if—such projects counted in tenure and promotion portfolios. Another wondered how the projects’ directors received credit for their work. Finally, one audience members seemed to question the entire premise of the panel altogether, asking whether the time spent developing these projects would be better spent producing journal articles or monographs. Such questions are important ones. They get at some of the tensions around integrating digital scholarship into the academic study of religion. But they also missed the point of the session.While the presenters were eager to talk about the pedagogical and intellectual benefits they had gained by employing digital methods, the audience was concerned with the professional issues that surround digital work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":218193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Humanities and Research Methods in Religious Studies\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Humanities and Research Methods in Religious Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110573022-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Humanities and Research Methods in Religious Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110573022-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2018年,美国宗教学院举办了一个关于数字研究和教学项目的特别“通配符”小组,鼓励学生与当地社区互动。题为“用数字人文学科教授地方宗教:对象、方法、教学法”的会议邀请了10位教育工作者,他们为8个不同的项目做出了贡献。其中一些项目是在主要的研究型大学开展的,并与全国各地的社区合作。其他人则被安置在小型文理学院,并专注于一个礼拜场所。但几乎所有的项目都与学者的研究议程有关,并采用了数字人文学科(DH)的工具和方法,以便从学生合作者的工作中受益尽管小组讨论的重点是教学,但随后的问答环节也涉及了其他问题。观众的第一个问题是,这些项目如何——甚至是否——被计入终身职位和晋升组合。另一个人想知道,这些项目的负责人是如何从他们的工作中获得荣誉的。最后,一位听众似乎对整个小组讨论的前提提出了质疑,他问,花在开发这些项目上的时间是否更适合花在撰写期刊文章或专著上。这些问题都很重要。他们在将数字学术整合到宗教学术研究中遇到了一些矛盾。但他们也错过了会议的重点。当主讲人热切地谈论他们通过使用数字方法获得的教学和智力上的好处时,听众们关心的是围绕数字工作的专业问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital Humanities and Religious Studies: A “Why” To Guide
In 2018, the American Academy of Religion hosted a special “wildcard” panel on digital research and teaching projects that encourage students to engage with their local communities. Titled “Teaching Local Religion with Digital Humanities: Objects, Methods, Pedagogies,” the session featured ten educators who contributed to eight different projects. Some of the projects were based at major research universities and worked with communities across the country. Others were housed at small liberal arts colleges and focused on one place of worship. But almost all of the projects connected with the scholars’ research agenda and employed the tools and methods of digital humanities (DH) in order to benefit from the work of student collaborators.1 Despite the panel’s explicit focus on teaching, the question and answer session that followed forayed into other matters. The very first question from the audience asked how—or even if—such projects counted in tenure and promotion portfolios. Another wondered how the projects’ directors received credit for their work. Finally, one audience members seemed to question the entire premise of the panel altogether, asking whether the time spent developing these projects would be better spent producing journal articles or monographs. Such questions are important ones. They get at some of the tensions around integrating digital scholarship into the academic study of religion. But they also missed the point of the session.While the presenters were eager to talk about the pedagogical and intellectual benefits they had gained by employing digital methods, the audience was concerned with the professional issues that surround digital work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信