{"title":"使用固定义齿或种植体支持的单冠进行单牙置换的经济评价","authors":"Varga Thomas Gabor Johan","doi":"10.52793/jomdr.2020.1(1)-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Dentists and patients are frequently confronted by a difficult treatment decision: should a missing tooth be replaced with a fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) or an implant- supported single crown (ISC)? Material and Methods: Forty seven patients with one singular missing tooth and 6 patients with two singular missing teeth in non-adjacent positions were included in this study. 29 tooth gaps were closed with FDPs and thirty with ISCs. Material costs, treatment hours and number of visits were recorded and compared for the two treatment groups. Results: Due to surgery, the total number of visits was higher for the ISC than for the FDP group (7.5±2.8 vs. 6.2±3.6; p=0.03), but the actual chair side time was the same (5.3±1.8 hours vs. 5.0±2.5 hours; p=0.22). Pretreatment costs were significantly lower for the ISC group CHF","PeriodicalId":333418,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Oral Medicine And Dental Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Evaluation Of Single-Tooth Replacement Using Fixed Dental Prosthesis Or Implant-Supported Single Crowns\",\"authors\":\"Varga Thomas Gabor Johan\",\"doi\":\"10.52793/jomdr.2020.1(1)-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Dentists and patients are frequently confronted by a difficult treatment decision: should a missing tooth be replaced with a fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) or an implant- supported single crown (ISC)? Material and Methods: Forty seven patients with one singular missing tooth and 6 patients with two singular missing teeth in non-adjacent positions were included in this study. 29 tooth gaps were closed with FDPs and thirty with ISCs. Material costs, treatment hours and number of visits were recorded and compared for the two treatment groups. Results: Due to surgery, the total number of visits was higher for the ISC than for the FDP group (7.5±2.8 vs. 6.2±3.6; p=0.03), but the actual chair side time was the same (5.3±1.8 hours vs. 5.0±2.5 hours; p=0.22). Pretreatment costs were significantly lower for the ISC group CHF\",\"PeriodicalId\":333418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal Of Oral Medicine And Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal Of Oral Medicine And Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52793/jomdr.2020.1(1)-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Oral Medicine And Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52793/jomdr.2020.1(1)-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:牙医和患者经常面临一个困难的治疗决定:缺失的牙齿应该用固定义齿(FDP)或种植体支持的单冠(ISC)代替?材料与方法:选取47例单缺牙患者和6例非相邻位置单缺牙患者。fdp闭合29个牙隙，ISCs闭合30个牙隙。记录并比较两个治疗组的材料费用、治疗时间和就诊次数。结果:由于手术，ISC组的总就诊次数高于FDP组(7.5±2.8 vs. 6.2±3.6;P =0.03)，但实际椅侧时间相同(5.3±1.8小时vs. 5.0±2.5小时;p = 0.22)。ISC组的预处理费用明显低于CHF组
Economic Evaluation Of Single-Tooth Replacement Using Fixed Dental Prosthesis Or Implant-Supported Single Crowns
Objectives: Dentists and patients are frequently confronted by a difficult treatment decision: should a missing tooth be replaced with a fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) or an implant- supported single crown (ISC)? Material and Methods: Forty seven patients with one singular missing tooth and 6 patients with two singular missing teeth in non-adjacent positions were included in this study. 29 tooth gaps were closed with FDPs and thirty with ISCs. Material costs, treatment hours and number of visits were recorded and compared for the two treatment groups. Results: Due to surgery, the total number of visits was higher for the ISC than for the FDP group (7.5±2.8 vs. 6.2±3.6; p=0.03), but the actual chair side time was the same (5.3±1.8 hours vs. 5.0±2.5 hours; p=0.22). Pretreatment costs were significantly lower for the ISC group CHF
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
