健康项目课程改进的结果:LPU夏令营的经验

Anacleta P. Valdez, Citadel A. Panganiban, Mark H. Alday
{"title":"健康项目课程改进的结果:LPU夏令营的经验","authors":"Anacleta P. Valdez, Citadel A. Panganiban, Mark H. Alday","doi":"10.7718/iamure.ije.v7i1.563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher educational system has gone through substantial reforms and changes vis-a-vis curriculum innovation over the past years. The evaluation of a revised pro­gram is one of the most relevant courses of action done when curriculum change is to be implemented. One of the main reasons is that it is a chance for practitioners to test for themselves if their plan is working. It also serves as an identification of the strengths and weaknesses of the said intervention. This study was conducted to assess the results of the implementation of the Bachelor of Science in Medical Labo­ratory Science program. It employed descriptive survey using two types of self-made questionnaire, the Likert scale and open-ended type survey. Likewise, data on the results of the graduates’ licensure examinations and status of employment were also analyzed and correlated. Eighty two graduates from 2010 to 2012 of the enhanced Medical Technology program of LPU-Batangas and 13 chief medical technologists from identified affiliate-hospitals were surveyed about their perception on the at­tainment of the objectives, the realization of the core competencies as well as the supposed strengths and weaknesses of the program. Results showed that objectives were achieved alongside the significant improvements in the board performance and employment rate were noted. This study can be used as a pilot study for other higher education institutions with the same health program. This can also be used as a basis for a curricular reform by assessing the different parameters that were identified. Keywords: Medical Laboratory Science Curriculum, internship training program, chief medical technologists, board performance, graduates’ employment, Lyceum of the Philippines University Batangas, Philippines","PeriodicalId":416137,"journal":{"name":"IAMURE: International Journal of Education","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Curricular Enhancement in a Health Program: LPU CAMP Experience\",\"authors\":\"Anacleta P. Valdez, Citadel A. Panganiban, Mark H. Alday\",\"doi\":\"10.7718/iamure.ije.v7i1.563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Higher educational system has gone through substantial reforms and changes vis-a-vis curriculum innovation over the past years. The evaluation of a revised pro­gram is one of the most relevant courses of action done when curriculum change is to be implemented. One of the main reasons is that it is a chance for practitioners to test for themselves if their plan is working. It also serves as an identification of the strengths and weaknesses of the said intervention. This study was conducted to assess the results of the implementation of the Bachelor of Science in Medical Labo­ratory Science program. It employed descriptive survey using two types of self-made questionnaire, the Likert scale and open-ended type survey. Likewise, data on the results of the graduates’ licensure examinations and status of employment were also analyzed and correlated. Eighty two graduates from 2010 to 2012 of the enhanced Medical Technology program of LPU-Batangas and 13 chief medical technologists from identified affiliate-hospitals were surveyed about their perception on the at­tainment of the objectives, the realization of the core competencies as well as the supposed strengths and weaknesses of the program. Results showed that objectives were achieved alongside the significant improvements in the board performance and employment rate were noted. This study can be used as a pilot study for other higher education institutions with the same health program. This can also be used as a basis for a curricular reform by assessing the different parameters that were identified. Keywords: Medical Laboratory Science Curriculum, internship training program, chief medical technologists, board performance, graduates’ employment, Lyceum of the Philippines University Batangas, Philippines\",\"PeriodicalId\":416137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IAMURE: International Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IAMURE: International Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7718/iamure.ije.v7i1.563\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IAMURE: International Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7718/iamure.ije.v7i1.563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,高等教育体制在课程创新方面经历了实质性的改革和变化。修订后的课程评估是实施课程改革时最相关的行动之一。其中一个主要原因是,这是从业者自己测试他们的计划是否有效的机会。它还有助于确定上述干预措施的长处和短处。本研究旨在评估医学检验科学学士学位课程的实施效果。本研究采用描述性调查,采用李克特量表和开放式问卷两种自制问卷。同样地,对毕业生的执照考试结果和就业状况的数据也进行了分析和关联。本研究调查了八十二位2010至2012年八打雁公立大学强化医疗技术计划的毕业生和13位来自附属医院的首席医疗技术人员,了解他们对目标的实现、核心竞争力的实现以及该计划的预期优势和弱点的看法。结果显示,在董事会业绩和就业率显著提高的同时,各项目标也得以实现。本研究可作为其他高等院校同类健康项目的试点研究。通过评估所确定的不同参数,这也可以作为课程改革的基础。关键词:医学检验课程,实习培训计划,首席医疗技术人员,董事会绩效,毕业生就业,菲律宾巴丹加斯大学兰ceum,菲律宾
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Curricular Enhancement in a Health Program: LPU CAMP Experience
Higher educational system has gone through substantial reforms and changes vis-a-vis curriculum innovation over the past years. The evaluation of a revised pro­gram is one of the most relevant courses of action done when curriculum change is to be implemented. One of the main reasons is that it is a chance for practitioners to test for themselves if their plan is working. It also serves as an identification of the strengths and weaknesses of the said intervention. This study was conducted to assess the results of the implementation of the Bachelor of Science in Medical Labo­ratory Science program. It employed descriptive survey using two types of self-made questionnaire, the Likert scale and open-ended type survey. Likewise, data on the results of the graduates’ licensure examinations and status of employment were also analyzed and correlated. Eighty two graduates from 2010 to 2012 of the enhanced Medical Technology program of LPU-Batangas and 13 chief medical technologists from identified affiliate-hospitals were surveyed about their perception on the at­tainment of the objectives, the realization of the core competencies as well as the supposed strengths and weaknesses of the program. Results showed that objectives were achieved alongside the significant improvements in the board performance and employment rate were noted. This study can be used as a pilot study for other higher education institutions with the same health program. This can also be used as a basis for a curricular reform by assessing the different parameters that were identified. Keywords: Medical Laboratory Science Curriculum, internship training program, chief medical technologists, board performance, graduates’ employment, Lyceum of the Philippines University Batangas, Philippines
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信