绿色建筑评价标准的比较研究:对环境、资源和能源问题的主要/次要重视

Chakkrit Luangcharoenrat, S. Intrachooto
{"title":"绿色建筑评价标准的比较研究:对环境、资源和能源问题的主要/次要重视","authors":"Chakkrit Luangcharoenrat, S. Intrachooto","doi":"10.56261/jars.v10i1.12914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many countries have developed environmental assessment rating standards for environmentally responsiblebuildings. This paper aims to compare the relative importance of issues included in these assessmentstandards, especially the rating standards developed by Thailand and members of the World Green BuildingCouncil. The study found that most building rating systems focuses mainly on the design phase and giveshigher emphasis to energy and environmental mitigation issues with “proactive” measures. On the contrary,emphasis on construction materials and resource management is minimal; and all of which are “reactive”measures.","PeriodicalId":428713,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Green Building Evaluation Standards: Identifying Major/Minor Emphasis on Environment, Resource and Energy Issues\",\"authors\":\"Chakkrit Luangcharoenrat, S. Intrachooto\",\"doi\":\"10.56261/jars.v10i1.12914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many countries have developed environmental assessment rating standards for environmentally responsiblebuildings. This paper aims to compare the relative importance of issues included in these assessmentstandards, especially the rating standards developed by Thailand and members of the World Green BuildingCouncil. The study found that most building rating systems focuses mainly on the design phase and giveshigher emphasis to energy and environmental mitigation issues with “proactive” measures. On the contrary,emphasis on construction materials and resource management is minimal; and all of which are “reactive”measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":428713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56261/jars.v10i1.12914\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56261/jars.v10i1.12914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

许多国家都制定了环境责任建筑的环境评价评级标准。本文旨在比较这些评估标准中所包含的问题的相对重要性,特别是泰国和世界绿色建筑委员会成员制定的评级标准。研究发现,大多数建筑评级系统主要关注设计阶段,并通过“主动”措施更加强调能源和环境缓解问题。相反,对建筑材料和资源管理的重视很少;所有这些都是“反应性”措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Green Building Evaluation Standards: Identifying Major/Minor Emphasis on Environment, Resource and Energy Issues
Many countries have developed environmental assessment rating standards for environmentally responsiblebuildings. This paper aims to compare the relative importance of issues included in these assessmentstandards, especially the rating standards developed by Thailand and members of the World Green BuildingCouncil. The study found that most building rating systems focuses mainly on the design phase and giveshigher emphasis to energy and environmental mitigation issues with “proactive” measures. On the contrary,emphasis on construction materials and resource management is minimal; and all of which are “reactive”measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信