欧洲卫生技术评估:向中等收入国家传播和应用高收入国家的经验教训

V. Moran, A. Fidler
{"title":"欧洲卫生技术评估:向中等收入国家传播和应用高收入国家的经验教训","authors":"V. Moran, A. Fidler","doi":"10.1179/175330310X12665793931302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Continuous innovation and research in health result in the development of new medical technologies. Such technologies demonstrate varying levels of costs and effectiveness, with some producing benefits at comparable or lower costs while others result in higher levels of health expenditure. European health systems are constrained by limited resources, and health managers and policymakers face choices regarding what new technologies to fund. Such decisions are increasingly supported by health technology assessment (HTA). While formal HTA agencies and networks are predominant in high-income European countries, they rarely exist in middle-income European countries. This is despite the fact that such countries have a greater need for the evidence base and cost-effectiveness of new health technologies to guide funding decisions due to lower levels of resources as well as increasing pressures from pharmaceutical and health-technology companies. High-income European countries should therefore provide technical assistance and support for their middle-income counterparts to institutionalise HTA in health policy-making across Europe.","PeriodicalId":354315,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health technology assessment in Europe: Communicating and applying lessons learned from high-income countries to middle-income countries\",\"authors\":\"V. Moran, A. Fidler\",\"doi\":\"10.1179/175330310X12665793931302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Continuous innovation and research in health result in the development of new medical technologies. Such technologies demonstrate varying levels of costs and effectiveness, with some producing benefits at comparable or lower costs while others result in higher levels of health expenditure. European health systems are constrained by limited resources, and health managers and policymakers face choices regarding what new technologies to fund. Such decisions are increasingly supported by health technology assessment (HTA). While formal HTA agencies and networks are predominant in high-income European countries, they rarely exist in middle-income European countries. This is despite the fact that such countries have a greater need for the evidence base and cost-effectiveness of new health technologies to guide funding decisions due to lower levels of resources as well as increasing pressures from pharmaceutical and health-technology companies. High-income European countries should therefore provide technical assistance and support for their middle-income counterparts to institutionalise HTA in health policy-making across Europe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1179/175330310X12665793931302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/175330310X12665793931302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

健康领域的不断创新和研究导致了新的医疗技术的发展。这类技术显示出不同程度的成本和效益,其中一些技术以相当或更低的成本产生效益,而另一些技术则导致较高水平的保健支出。欧洲卫生系统受到有限资源的限制,卫生管理人员和政策制定者面临着为哪些新技术提供资金的选择。这些决定越来越多地得到卫生技术评估的支持。虽然正式的HTA机构和网络在高收入欧洲国家占主导地位,但在中等收入欧洲国家却很少存在。尽管由于资源水平较低以及来自制药和卫生技术公司的压力日益增加,这些国家更需要新卫生技术的证据基础和成本效益来指导供资决定。因此,高收入的欧洲国家应向中等收入国家提供技术援助和支持,使HTA在整个欧洲的卫生政策制定中制度化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health technology assessment in Europe: Communicating and applying lessons learned from high-income countries to middle-income countries
Abstract Continuous innovation and research in health result in the development of new medical technologies. Such technologies demonstrate varying levels of costs and effectiveness, with some producing benefits at comparable or lower costs while others result in higher levels of health expenditure. European health systems are constrained by limited resources, and health managers and policymakers face choices regarding what new technologies to fund. Such decisions are increasingly supported by health technology assessment (HTA). While formal HTA agencies and networks are predominant in high-income European countries, they rarely exist in middle-income European countries. This is despite the fact that such countries have a greater need for the evidence base and cost-effectiveness of new health technologies to guide funding decisions due to lower levels of resources as well as increasing pressures from pharmaceutical and health-technology companies. High-income European countries should therefore provide technical assistance and support for their middle-income counterparts to institutionalise HTA in health policy-making across Europe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信