网络物理系统传感器攻击的定量鲁棒性分析

Stephen Chong, R. Lanotte, Massimo Merro, S. Tini, Jian Xiang
{"title":"网络物理系统传感器攻击的定量鲁棒性分析","authors":"Stephen Chong, R. Lanotte, Massimo Merro, S. Tini, Jian Xiang","doi":"10.1145/3575870.3587118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper contributes a formal framework for quantitative analysis of bounded sensor attacks on cyber-physical systems, using the formalism of differential dynamic logic. Given a precondition and postcondition of a system, we formalize two quantitative safety notions, quantitative forward and backward safety, which respectively express (1) how strong the strongest postcondition of the system is with respect to the specified postcondition, and (2) how strong the specified precondition is with respect to the weakest precondition of the system needed to ensure the specified postcondition holds. We introduce two notions, forward and backward robustness, to characterize the robustness of a system against sensor attacks as the loss of safety. Two simulation distances, which respectively characterize upper bounds of the degree of forward and backward safety loss caused by the sensor attacks, are developed to reason with robustness. We verify the two simulation distances by expressing them as formulas of differential dynamic logic. We showcase an example of an autonomous vehicle that needs to avoid a collision.","PeriodicalId":426801,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Robustness Analysis of Sensor Attacks on Cyber-Physical Systems\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Chong, R. Lanotte, Massimo Merro, S. Tini, Jian Xiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3575870.3587118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper contributes a formal framework for quantitative analysis of bounded sensor attacks on cyber-physical systems, using the formalism of differential dynamic logic. Given a precondition and postcondition of a system, we formalize two quantitative safety notions, quantitative forward and backward safety, which respectively express (1) how strong the strongest postcondition of the system is with respect to the specified postcondition, and (2) how strong the specified precondition is with respect to the weakest precondition of the system needed to ensure the specified postcondition holds. We introduce two notions, forward and backward robustness, to characterize the robustness of a system against sensor attacks as the loss of safety. Two simulation distances, which respectively characterize upper bounds of the degree of forward and backward safety loss caused by the sensor attacks, are developed to reason with robustness. We verify the two simulation distances by expressing them as formulas of differential dynamic logic. We showcase an example of an autonomous vehicle that needs to avoid a collision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3575870.3587118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3575870.3587118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文利用微分动态逻辑的形式化,为定量分析网络物理系统的有界传感器攻击提供了形式化框架。给定一个系统的前置条件和后置条件,我们形式化了两个定量安全概念,即定量前向安全和后向安全,它们分别表示(1)系统的最强后置条件相对于指定后置条件有多强,以及(2)指定的前置条件相对于确保指定后置条件成立所需的系统的最弱前置条件有多强。我们引入了两个概念,前向和后向鲁棒性,以描述系统对传感器攻击的鲁棒性,即安全性的丧失。建立了具有鲁棒性的两个仿真距离,分别表征传感器攻击造成的正向和反向安全损失程度的上界。我们用微分动态逻辑的公式来验证这两个仿真距离。我们将展示一个需要避免碰撞的自动驾驶汽车的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative Robustness Analysis of Sensor Attacks on Cyber-Physical Systems
This paper contributes a formal framework for quantitative analysis of bounded sensor attacks on cyber-physical systems, using the formalism of differential dynamic logic. Given a precondition and postcondition of a system, we formalize two quantitative safety notions, quantitative forward and backward safety, which respectively express (1) how strong the strongest postcondition of the system is with respect to the specified postcondition, and (2) how strong the specified precondition is with respect to the weakest precondition of the system needed to ensure the specified postcondition holds. We introduce two notions, forward and backward robustness, to characterize the robustness of a system against sensor attacks as the loss of safety. Two simulation distances, which respectively characterize upper bounds of the degree of forward and backward safety loss caused by the sensor attacks, are developed to reason with robustness. We verify the two simulation distances by expressing them as formulas of differential dynamic logic. We showcase an example of an autonomous vehicle that needs to avoid a collision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信