中PRF雷达的非相干积分

P. van Genderen, W. Meijer
{"title":"中PRF雷达的非相干积分","authors":"P. van Genderen, W. Meijer","doi":"10.1109/RADAR.1995.522526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a medium PRF radar, detection is ambiguous in both range and radial speed. The paper discusses some methods for the detection and resolution of range and radial speed in a radar with a burst oriented waveform, featuring PRF and RF changes from burst to burst. Two methods of detection are compared: (1) initial detection on a burst by burst basis and subsequent combination of the detections obtained from each burst; and (2) first unfolding the Doppler-processed video in both range and radial speed, summation of the corresponding received normalised powers and finally detection of the summed results. The results of both methods are compared, showing that the processing gain of the second method is significantly above the first method. An important aspect of these methods of detection is the power to resolve ambiguities. Without particular measures, the number of so-called ghost detections, i.e. detections at incorrectly resolved position and speed, may be significant. Two procedures to reduce the ghost rate are illustrated for a three burst scenario. The results indicate that the ghost rate may be reduced to low levels at the expense of a part of the processing gain.","PeriodicalId":326587,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings International Radar Conference","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non coherent integration in a medium PRF radar\",\"authors\":\"P. van Genderen, W. Meijer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RADAR.1995.522526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a medium PRF radar, detection is ambiguous in both range and radial speed. The paper discusses some methods for the detection and resolution of range and radial speed in a radar with a burst oriented waveform, featuring PRF and RF changes from burst to burst. Two methods of detection are compared: (1) initial detection on a burst by burst basis and subsequent combination of the detections obtained from each burst; and (2) first unfolding the Doppler-processed video in both range and radial speed, summation of the corresponding received normalised powers and finally detection of the summed results. The results of both methods are compared, showing that the processing gain of the second method is significantly above the first method. An important aspect of these methods of detection is the power to resolve ambiguities. Without particular measures, the number of so-called ghost detections, i.e. detections at incorrectly resolved position and speed, may be significant. Two procedures to reduce the ghost rate are illustrated for a three burst scenario. The results indicate that the ghost rate may be reduced to low levels at the expense of a part of the processing gain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings International Radar Conference\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings International Radar Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.1995.522526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings International Radar Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.1995.522526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在中PRF雷达中,探测在距离和径向速度上都是模糊的。本文讨论了一种脉冲定向波形雷达的距离和径向速度的探测和分辨方法,该波形具有脉冲间的频率和射频变化。比较了两种检测方法:(1)在一个突发的基础上进行初始检测,然后将每个突发的检测结果组合起来;(2)首先以距离和径向速度展开多普勒处理视频,对接收到的相应归一化功率求和,最后对求和结果进行检测。对两种方法的结果进行了比较,结果表明,第二种方法的处理增益明显高于第一种方法。这些检测方法的一个重要方面是解决歧义的能力。如果没有特别的措施,所谓的幽灵检测,即在不正确的位置和速度检测,可能是显著的。两个程序,以减少鬼率说明了三爆发的情况下。结果表明,以牺牲部分处理增益为代价,可以将虚影率降低到较低的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non coherent integration in a medium PRF radar
In a medium PRF radar, detection is ambiguous in both range and radial speed. The paper discusses some methods for the detection and resolution of range and radial speed in a radar with a burst oriented waveform, featuring PRF and RF changes from burst to burst. Two methods of detection are compared: (1) initial detection on a burst by burst basis and subsequent combination of the detections obtained from each burst; and (2) first unfolding the Doppler-processed video in both range and radial speed, summation of the corresponding received normalised powers and finally detection of the summed results. The results of both methods are compared, showing that the processing gain of the second method is significantly above the first method. An important aspect of these methods of detection is the power to resolve ambiguities. Without particular measures, the number of so-called ghost detections, i.e. detections at incorrectly resolved position and speed, may be significant. Two procedures to reduce the ghost rate are illustrated for a three burst scenario. The results indicate that the ghost rate may be reduced to low levels at the expense of a part of the processing gain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信