偏最小二乘路径建模中的中介分析:帮助研究人员讨论更复杂的模型

Christian Nitzl, J. Roldán, Gabriel Cepeda
{"title":"偏最小二乘路径建模中的中介分析:帮助研究人员讨论更复杂的模型","authors":"Christian Nitzl, J. Roldán, Gabriel Cepeda","doi":"10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indirect or mediated effects constitute a type of relationship between constructs that often occurs in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling. Over the past few years, the methods for testing mediation have become more sophisticated. However, many researchers continue to use outdated methods to test mediating effects in PLS, which can lead to erroneous results. One reason for the use of outdated methods or even the lack of their use altogether is that no systematic tutorials on PLS exist that draw on the newest statistical findings. The paper aims to discuss these issues.,This study illustrates the state-of-the-art use of mediation analysis in the context of PLS-structural equation modeling (SEM).,This study facilitates the adoption of modern procedures in PLS-SEM by challenging the conventional approach to mediation analysis and providing more accurate alternatives. In addition, the authors propose a decision tree and classification of mediation effects.,The recommended approach offers a wide range of testing options (e.g. multiple mediators) that go beyond simple mediation analysis alternatives, helping researchers discuss their studies in a more accurate way.","PeriodicalId":320844,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Econometrics","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1239","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mediation Analysis in Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Helping Researchers Discuss More Sophisticated Models\",\"authors\":\"Christian Nitzl, J. Roldán, Gabriel Cepeda\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Indirect or mediated effects constitute a type of relationship between constructs that often occurs in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling. Over the past few years, the methods for testing mediation have become more sophisticated. However, many researchers continue to use outdated methods to test mediating effects in PLS, which can lead to erroneous results. One reason for the use of outdated methods or even the lack of their use altogether is that no systematic tutorials on PLS exist that draw on the newest statistical findings. The paper aims to discuss these issues.,This study illustrates the state-of-the-art use of mediation analysis in the context of PLS-structural equation modeling (SEM).,This study facilitates the adoption of modern procedures in PLS-SEM by challenging the conventional approach to mediation analysis and providing more accurate alternatives. In addition, the authors propose a decision tree and classification of mediation effects.,The recommended approach offers a wide range of testing options (e.g. multiple mediators) that go beyond simple mediation analysis alternatives, helping researchers discuss their studies in a more accurate way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Econometrics\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1239\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1239

摘要

间接或中介效应构成了结构之间的一种关系,这种关系经常出现在偏最小二乘(PLS)路径建模中。在过去几年中,测试中介的方法变得更加复杂。然而,许多研究人员继续使用过时的方法来测试PLS的中介作用,这可能导致错误的结果。使用过时的方法甚至完全不使用这些方法的一个原因是,没有关于PLS的系统教程,利用最新的统计结果。本文旨在探讨这些问题。本研究说明了在pls -结构方程模型(SEM)的背景下使用最先进的中介分析。本研究通过挑战传统的中介分析方法并提供更准确的替代方法,促进了PLS-SEM中现代程序的采用。此外,作者还提出了决策树和中介效应分类。推荐的方法提供了广泛的测试选项(例如多种介质),超越了简单的中介分析替代方案,帮助研究人员以更准确的方式讨论他们的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mediation Analysis in Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Helping Researchers Discuss More Sophisticated Models
Indirect or mediated effects constitute a type of relationship between constructs that often occurs in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling. Over the past few years, the methods for testing mediation have become more sophisticated. However, many researchers continue to use outdated methods to test mediating effects in PLS, which can lead to erroneous results. One reason for the use of outdated methods or even the lack of their use altogether is that no systematic tutorials on PLS exist that draw on the newest statistical findings. The paper aims to discuss these issues.,This study illustrates the state-of-the-art use of mediation analysis in the context of PLS-structural equation modeling (SEM).,This study facilitates the adoption of modern procedures in PLS-SEM by challenging the conventional approach to mediation analysis and providing more accurate alternatives. In addition, the authors propose a decision tree and classification of mediation effects.,The recommended approach offers a wide range of testing options (e.g. multiple mediators) that go beyond simple mediation analysis alternatives, helping researchers discuss their studies in a more accurate way.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信