{"title":"简单介质和复杂介质基于电位分析方法的比较","authors":"M. Havrilla","doi":"10.1109/URSI-EMTS.2016.7571392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparison of vector and scalar potential formulations for simple and complex media is presented. Boundary conditions for the various formulations are provided, including new scalar potential boundary conditions valid for layered bianisotropic gyrotropic media. Advantages and limitations of each technique are discussed in order to identify the most suitable method of analysis for a given class of material.","PeriodicalId":400853,"journal":{"name":"2016 URSI International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory (EMTS)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of potential-based analysis methods for simple and complex media\",\"authors\":\"M. Havrilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/URSI-EMTS.2016.7571392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A comparison of vector and scalar potential formulations for simple and complex media is presented. Boundary conditions for the various formulations are provided, including new scalar potential boundary conditions valid for layered bianisotropic gyrotropic media. Advantages and limitations of each technique are discussed in order to identify the most suitable method of analysis for a given class of material.\",\"PeriodicalId\":400853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 URSI International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory (EMTS)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 URSI International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory (EMTS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/URSI-EMTS.2016.7571392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 URSI International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory (EMTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/URSI-EMTS.2016.7571392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of potential-based analysis methods for simple and complex media
A comparison of vector and scalar potential formulations for simple and complex media is presented. Boundary conditions for the various formulations are provided, including new scalar potential boundary conditions valid for layered bianisotropic gyrotropic media. Advantages and limitations of each technique are discussed in order to identify the most suitable method of analysis for a given class of material.