高低生听力策略与听力理解的关系

Fatimatus Zahroh
{"title":"高低生听力策略与听力理解的关系","authors":"Fatimatus Zahroh","doi":"10.29062/edu.v6i3.434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study explored the strategy used by high achievers (N=12) and low achievers (N=11). More specifically, it aimed to identify whether the listening strategy used by high achievers correlates significantly with listening comprehension and whether the listening strategy used by low achievers correlates significantly with listening comprehension. A listening comprehension test adopted from a paper-based Longman TOEFL test was used to assess participants’ listening comprehension. Listening strategies used the instrument developed by the researcher based on relevant literature; the listening strategy questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients were computed to answer the research question. The statistical analysis on correlation used by high achievers shows the significant firstly cognitive strategies get the coefficient correlation -.065>.05 secondly metacognitive strategies get the coefficient correlation -.243 >.05 and thirdly socio-affective strategies get the coefficient correlation of .234>.05 And from the result of data analysis The statistical analysis on correlation used by low achievers shows the significant firstly cognitive strategies get the coefficient correlation -.077>.05 secondly metacognitive strategies get the coefficient correlation -.231>.05 and thirdly socio-affective strategies get the coefficient correlation of .017>.05 So, the correlation between the listening strategy used by High achievers and Low achievers and listening comprehension was not significantly correlated","PeriodicalId":120978,"journal":{"name":"EDUTEC : Journal of Education And Technology","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship between listening strategy used by high and low achievers and their listening comprehension\",\"authors\":\"Fatimatus Zahroh\",\"doi\":\"10.29062/edu.v6i3.434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study explored the strategy used by high achievers (N=12) and low achievers (N=11). More specifically, it aimed to identify whether the listening strategy used by high achievers correlates significantly with listening comprehension and whether the listening strategy used by low achievers correlates significantly with listening comprehension. A listening comprehension test adopted from a paper-based Longman TOEFL test was used to assess participants’ listening comprehension. Listening strategies used the instrument developed by the researcher based on relevant literature; the listening strategy questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients were computed to answer the research question. The statistical analysis on correlation used by high achievers shows the significant firstly cognitive strategies get the coefficient correlation -.065>.05 secondly metacognitive strategies get the coefficient correlation -.243 >.05 and thirdly socio-affective strategies get the coefficient correlation of .234>.05 And from the result of data analysis The statistical analysis on correlation used by low achievers shows the significant firstly cognitive strategies get the coefficient correlation -.077>.05 secondly metacognitive strategies get the coefficient correlation -.231>.05 and thirdly socio-affective strategies get the coefficient correlation of .017>.05 So, the correlation between the listening strategy used by High achievers and Low achievers and listening comprehension was not significantly correlated\",\"PeriodicalId\":120978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EDUTEC : Journal of Education And Technology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EDUTEC : Journal of Education And Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29062/edu.v6i3.434\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUTEC : Journal of Education And Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29062/edu.v6i3.434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了高成就者(N=12)和低成就者(N=11)所使用的策略。更具体地说,它旨在确定高成就者使用的听力策略是否与听力理解显著相关,低成就者使用的听力策略是否与听力理解显著相关。采用朗曼托福笔试的听力理解测试来评估参与者的听力理解能力。研究人员根据相关文献开发的听力工具的听力策略;听力策略问卷。计算描述性统计和相关系数来回答研究问题。高成就者使用的相关统计分析显示,显著的第一认知策略相关系数为- 0.065 >。05其次元认知策略得到相关系数-。243 >。第三,社会情感策略的相关系数为0.234 > 0.05从数据分析的结果来看,成绩较差的学生所使用的相关系数统计分析表明,成绩显著的第一认知策略的相关系数为- 0.077 >。其次元认知策略的相关系数为-.231>。第三,社会情感策略的相关系数为0.017 > 0.05因此,高、低成就生的听力策略与听力理解的相关性不显著
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Relationship between listening strategy used by high and low achievers and their listening comprehension
The present study explored the strategy used by high achievers (N=12) and low achievers (N=11). More specifically, it aimed to identify whether the listening strategy used by high achievers correlates significantly with listening comprehension and whether the listening strategy used by low achievers correlates significantly with listening comprehension. A listening comprehension test adopted from a paper-based Longman TOEFL test was used to assess participants’ listening comprehension. Listening strategies used the instrument developed by the researcher based on relevant literature; the listening strategy questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients were computed to answer the research question. The statistical analysis on correlation used by high achievers shows the significant firstly cognitive strategies get the coefficient correlation -.065>.05 secondly metacognitive strategies get the coefficient correlation -.243 >.05 and thirdly socio-affective strategies get the coefficient correlation of .234>.05 And from the result of data analysis The statistical analysis on correlation used by low achievers shows the significant firstly cognitive strategies get the coefficient correlation -.077>.05 secondly metacognitive strategies get the coefficient correlation -.231>.05 and thirdly socio-affective strategies get the coefficient correlation of .017>.05 So, the correlation between the listening strategy used by High achievers and Low achievers and listening comprehension was not significantly correlated
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信