{"title":"“学校应该教什么”是小学课程的问题吗?","authors":"Jane Martin","doi":"10.2307/1179130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"George Beauchamp in his article, \"Basic Components of a Curriculum Theory\" made a number of interesting points. I would like to comment briefly on just one of them here. According to Beauchamp \"What ought to be taught in schools?\" is the primary curriculum question (p. o20). I will argue, first, that if there is one curriculum question that is primary, it is not this one; and second, that the search for the curriculum question or the primary curriculum question may itself be misguided.","PeriodicalId":273582,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Theory Network","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is \\\"What Ought to Be Taught in Schools?\\\" the Primary Curriculum Question?\",\"authors\":\"Jane Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1179130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"George Beauchamp in his article, \\\"Basic Components of a Curriculum Theory\\\" made a number of interesting points. I would like to comment briefly on just one of them here. According to Beauchamp \\\"What ought to be taught in schools?\\\" is the primary curriculum question (p. o20). I will argue, first, that if there is one curriculum question that is primary, it is not this one; and second, that the search for the curriculum question or the primary curriculum question may itself be misguided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum Theory Network\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum Theory Network\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1179130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Theory Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1179130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is "What Ought to Be Taught in Schools?" the Primary Curriculum Question?
George Beauchamp in his article, "Basic Components of a Curriculum Theory" made a number of interesting points. I would like to comment briefly on just one of them here. According to Beauchamp "What ought to be taught in schools?" is the primary curriculum question (p. o20). I will argue, first, that if there is one curriculum question that is primary, it is not this one; and second, that the search for the curriculum question or the primary curriculum question may itself be misguided.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
