通过实施流程优化实践,Egina深水完井作业实现了持续改进

Kenneth Johnson, Christophe Morand, M. Williams, V. Okengwu, V. Chaloupka, Romain Djenani, C. Okpalla, A. Achich
{"title":"通过实施流程优化实践,Egina深水完井作业实现了持续改进","authors":"Kenneth Johnson, Christophe Morand, M. Williams, V. Okengwu, V. Chaloupka, Romain Djenani, C. Okpalla, A. Achich","doi":"10.4043/29595-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Egina project has delivered best-in-class upper and lower completions, utilizing deep water completion experiences, global best practices, and lessons learned using a \"factory\" approach providing robust completion processes. Continuous improvement throughout the completion process was achieved through process optimization practices that contributed to the overall success of the project. Lower completion (LC) times have been reduced by 60 % between the first and 26th well, while reducing upper completion (UC) times by 40 % for the same wells. Well construction durations, including drilling and completion, currently averages 24 days per well, with lower and upper completion operating efficiencies (OE), and run reliabilities (RR), exceeding 98 %. Mechanical skins average approximately 2.5, while productivity/injectivity indices recorded 26 wells, during initial flowback and injection testing, average around 150 B/D/psi (325 m3/D/bar).\n Standardized completion designs identified the fundamental process tasks and estimated cycle times associated with those tasks. A disciplined process approach was maintained to help minimize potential risks—by using Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) and Failure Risk Analysis (FRA)—during all stages of the project, anticipating requirements and potential issues. Implementation of lessons learned from previous deep water operations during the project was fundamental to design optimization and the allocation of local resources. Following in the spirit of a \"factory\" approach in executing the completions, all times for tasks and subtasks were captured from the onset of project inception, allowing the project team to establish benchmark task times, while demonstrating continuous improvement throughout the project.\n The project has delivered best-in-class completions, leveraging deep water completion experiences and referencing global best practices and lessons learned. Fundamental tasks for both the lower and upper completions were identified as the areas where the most significant efficiency improvements could be gained. The team developed a data tracking process to help ensure tasks and subtasks were monitored during the completion process, allowing the project to establish best practices. Statistical analysis of lower and upper completion tasks and subtasks was constantly monitored, with results communicated to the team. Since project kickoff, lower completion run rates have been reduced by 60 % between the first and 26th well, while reducing upper completion rates by 40 %. Well construction durations currently average 24 days per well, and lower and upper completion operating efficiencies and run reliabilities exceed 98 %.\n The project established Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for fundamental tasks monitored during the completion process, establishing benchmark metrics for each while monitoring continuous improvement. Reviews of these tasks within the completion process for completed wells have helped identify the improvement of best practices and lessons learned, at the task and subtask level, which have been applied to future completion activities in Nigeria and additionally shared within the operator’s global deep water operations.","PeriodicalId":214691,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Egina Deep Water Completion Operations Continuous Improvement Achieved by Implementing Process Optimization Practices\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Johnson, Christophe Morand, M. Williams, V. Okengwu, V. Chaloupka, Romain Djenani, C. Okpalla, A. Achich\",\"doi\":\"10.4043/29595-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The Egina project has delivered best-in-class upper and lower completions, utilizing deep water completion experiences, global best practices, and lessons learned using a \\\"factory\\\" approach providing robust completion processes. Continuous improvement throughout the completion process was achieved through process optimization practices that contributed to the overall success of the project. Lower completion (LC) times have been reduced by 60 % between the first and 26th well, while reducing upper completion (UC) times by 40 % for the same wells. Well construction durations, including drilling and completion, currently averages 24 days per well, with lower and upper completion operating efficiencies (OE), and run reliabilities (RR), exceeding 98 %. Mechanical skins average approximately 2.5, while productivity/injectivity indices recorded 26 wells, during initial flowback and injection testing, average around 150 B/D/psi (325 m3/D/bar).\\n Standardized completion designs identified the fundamental process tasks and estimated cycle times associated with those tasks. A disciplined process approach was maintained to help minimize potential risks—by using Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) and Failure Risk Analysis (FRA)—during all stages of the project, anticipating requirements and potential issues. Implementation of lessons learned from previous deep water operations during the project was fundamental to design optimization and the allocation of local resources. Following in the spirit of a \\\"factory\\\" approach in executing the completions, all times for tasks and subtasks were captured from the onset of project inception, allowing the project team to establish benchmark task times, while demonstrating continuous improvement throughout the project.\\n The project has delivered best-in-class completions, leveraging deep water completion experiences and referencing global best practices and lessons learned. Fundamental tasks for both the lower and upper completions were identified as the areas where the most significant efficiency improvements could be gained. The team developed a data tracking process to help ensure tasks and subtasks were monitored during the completion process, allowing the project to establish best practices. Statistical analysis of lower and upper completion tasks and subtasks was constantly monitored, with results communicated to the team. Since project kickoff, lower completion run rates have been reduced by 60 % between the first and 26th well, while reducing upper completion rates by 40 %. Well construction durations currently average 24 days per well, and lower and upper completion operating efficiencies and run reliabilities exceed 98 %.\\n The project established Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for fundamental tasks monitored during the completion process, establishing benchmark metrics for each while monitoring continuous improvement. Reviews of these tasks within the completion process for completed wells have helped identify the improvement of best practices and lessons learned, at the task and subtask level, which have been applied to future completion activities in Nigeria and additionally shared within the operator’s global deep water operations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":214691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4043/29595-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29595-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

Egina项目利用深水完井经验、全球最佳实践和“工厂”方法,提供了一流的上部和下部完井,提供了强大的完井流程。在整个完井过程中,通过过程优化实践实现了持续改进,为项目的整体成功做出了贡献。从第一口井到第26口井,下部完井(LC)时间减少了60%,而同一口井的上部完井(UC)时间减少了40%。目前,包括钻井和完井在内的建井时间平均为每口井24天,完井作业效率(OE)和下入可靠性(RR)的高低均超过98%。机械表皮平均约为2.5,而产能/注入指数记录为26口井,在初始返排和注入测试中,平均约为150 B/D/psi (325 m3/D/bar)。标准化完井设计确定了基本的工艺任务,并估计了与这些任务相关的周期时间。在项目的所有阶段,通过使用故障模式、影响和临界分析(FMECA)和故障风险分析(FRA),保持有纪律的过程方法,以帮助最大限度地降低潜在风险,预测需求和潜在问题。在项目期间,从以前的深水作业中吸取的经验教训是设计优化和当地资源分配的基础。在执行完成过程中遵循“工厂”方法的精神,任务和子任务的所有时间都是从项目开始时开始捕获的,允许项目团队建立基准任务时间,同时在整个项目中演示持续改进。该项目利用深水完井经验,借鉴全球最佳实践和经验教训,完成了一流的完井作业。下部完井和上部完井的基本任务被确定为可以获得最显著效率改进的领域。该团队开发了一个数据跟踪流程,以帮助确保在完成过程中监控任务和子任务,从而使项目能够建立最佳实践。对较低和较高的完成任务和子任务的统计分析进行持续监控,并将结果传达给团队。自项目启动以来,第一口井至第26口井的下完井率降低了60%,而上完井率降低了40%。目前,每口井的平均施工时间为24天,上下完井作业效率和运行可靠性超过98%。项目为完成过程中监控的基本任务建立了关键绩效指标(kpi),为每个任务建立了基准度量,同时监控持续改进。对完井完井过程中这些任务的回顾有助于确定在任务和子任务级别上的最佳实践和经验教训的改进,这些经验和教训已应用于未来在尼日利亚的完井活动,并在作业者的全球深水作业中分享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Egina Deep Water Completion Operations Continuous Improvement Achieved by Implementing Process Optimization Practices
The Egina project has delivered best-in-class upper and lower completions, utilizing deep water completion experiences, global best practices, and lessons learned using a "factory" approach providing robust completion processes. Continuous improvement throughout the completion process was achieved through process optimization practices that contributed to the overall success of the project. Lower completion (LC) times have been reduced by 60 % between the first and 26th well, while reducing upper completion (UC) times by 40 % for the same wells. Well construction durations, including drilling and completion, currently averages 24 days per well, with lower and upper completion operating efficiencies (OE), and run reliabilities (RR), exceeding 98 %. Mechanical skins average approximately 2.5, while productivity/injectivity indices recorded 26 wells, during initial flowback and injection testing, average around 150 B/D/psi (325 m3/D/bar). Standardized completion designs identified the fundamental process tasks and estimated cycle times associated with those tasks. A disciplined process approach was maintained to help minimize potential risks—by using Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) and Failure Risk Analysis (FRA)—during all stages of the project, anticipating requirements and potential issues. Implementation of lessons learned from previous deep water operations during the project was fundamental to design optimization and the allocation of local resources. Following in the spirit of a "factory" approach in executing the completions, all times for tasks and subtasks were captured from the onset of project inception, allowing the project team to establish benchmark task times, while demonstrating continuous improvement throughout the project. The project has delivered best-in-class completions, leveraging deep water completion experiences and referencing global best practices and lessons learned. Fundamental tasks for both the lower and upper completions were identified as the areas where the most significant efficiency improvements could be gained. The team developed a data tracking process to help ensure tasks and subtasks were monitored during the completion process, allowing the project to establish best practices. Statistical analysis of lower and upper completion tasks and subtasks was constantly monitored, with results communicated to the team. Since project kickoff, lower completion run rates have been reduced by 60 % between the first and 26th well, while reducing upper completion rates by 40 %. Well construction durations currently average 24 days per well, and lower and upper completion operating efficiencies and run reliabilities exceed 98 %. The project established Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for fundamental tasks monitored during the completion process, establishing benchmark metrics for each while monitoring continuous improvement. Reviews of these tasks within the completion process for completed wells have helped identify the improvement of best practices and lessons learned, at the task and subtask level, which have been applied to future completion activities in Nigeria and additionally shared within the operator’s global deep water operations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信