{"title":"巴淡岛小学英语课堂互动中教师口头反馈分析","authors":"Mega Yulia, Y. Zainil","doi":"10.24036/JELT.V10I1.111373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present research aims to figure out (1) types of oral feedback used by teachers’ in EFL classroom interaction (2) teachers’ reasons for using oral feedback in EFL classroom interaction, and (2) students’ perceptions about teachers’ oral feedback in EFL classroom interactions. The study employed qualitative descriptive research with the three teachers of SMP Negeri 10 Batam and also students for grade seven, eight and nine as the participants. Observation and Stimulated Recall Interview (SIR) were used to conduct the data, and the data were analysed by using thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006). The result of this research showed that the teachers used 6 types of oral feedback, namely correction, recast, clarificationrequest, metalinguistic feedback, elicitation and repetitionfrom the theory of (Lightbown and Spada, 1999). However, the average of teachers’ oral feedback use showed a low percen teachers employed oral feedback because of teachers’ responsibility and obligation to provide it, the effective and efficient feedback mode, the utility of oral feedback, positive effect to students, and consequences of none of oral feedback.Through a stimulated recall interview, the teachers admitted that they are still not optimal in providing input to the students. Mostly, the perceived positively to oral feedback. Some students found felt sensitive to oral feedback. Nevertheless, they still realized to its positive effect on the result of their work or performance","PeriodicalId":149821,"journal":{"name":"Journal on English Language Teaching","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis of Teachers’ Oral Feedback in EFL Classroom Interaction at SMP Negeri 10 Batam\",\"authors\":\"Mega Yulia, Y. Zainil\",\"doi\":\"10.24036/JELT.V10I1.111373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present research aims to figure out (1) types of oral feedback used by teachers’ in EFL classroom interaction (2) teachers’ reasons for using oral feedback in EFL classroom interaction, and (2) students’ perceptions about teachers’ oral feedback in EFL classroom interactions. The study employed qualitative descriptive research with the three teachers of SMP Negeri 10 Batam and also students for grade seven, eight and nine as the participants. Observation and Stimulated Recall Interview (SIR) were used to conduct the data, and the data were analysed by using thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006). The result of this research showed that the teachers used 6 types of oral feedback, namely correction, recast, clarificationrequest, metalinguistic feedback, elicitation and repetitionfrom the theory of (Lightbown and Spada, 1999). However, the average of teachers’ oral feedback use showed a low percen teachers employed oral feedback because of teachers’ responsibility and obligation to provide it, the effective and efficient feedback mode, the utility of oral feedback, positive effect to students, and consequences of none of oral feedback.Through a stimulated recall interview, the teachers admitted that they are still not optimal in providing input to the students. Mostly, the perceived positively to oral feedback. Some students found felt sensitive to oral feedback. Nevertheless, they still realized to its positive effect on the result of their work or performance\",\"PeriodicalId\":149821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal on English Language Teaching\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal on English Language Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24036/JELT.V10I1.111373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/JELT.V10I1.111373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
本研究旨在弄清楚(1)教师在英语课堂互动中使用的口头反馈类型(2)教师在英语课堂互动中使用口头反馈的原因,以及(2)学生对教师在英语课堂互动中使用口头反馈的看法。本研究采用定性描述性研究,以巴淡岛SMP Negeri 10的三位教师和七、八、九年级的学生为研究对象。数据采用观察法和刺激回忆访谈法(SIR)进行,数据采用主题分析法进行分析(Braun & Clarke, 2006)。本研究结果表明,教师使用了6种类型的口头反馈,即纠正、重铸、澄清请求、元语言反馈、启发和重复(Lightbown和Spada, 1999)。然而,教师使用口头反馈的平均比例显示,由于教师有责任和义务提供口头反馈,反馈模式有效和高效,口头反馈的效用,对学生的积极影响以及没有口头反馈的后果,教师使用口头反馈的比例较低。通过刺激回忆访谈,教师承认他们在为学生提供输入方面仍然不是最佳的。大多数情况下,他们对口头反馈的感知是积极的。一些学生发现他们对口头反馈很敏感。然而,他们仍然意识到它对他们的工作或表现的结果的积极影响
An Analysis of Teachers’ Oral Feedback in EFL Classroom Interaction at SMP Negeri 10 Batam
The present research aims to figure out (1) types of oral feedback used by teachers’ in EFL classroom interaction (2) teachers’ reasons for using oral feedback in EFL classroom interaction, and (2) students’ perceptions about teachers’ oral feedback in EFL classroom interactions. The study employed qualitative descriptive research with the three teachers of SMP Negeri 10 Batam and also students for grade seven, eight and nine as the participants. Observation and Stimulated Recall Interview (SIR) were used to conduct the data, and the data were analysed by using thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006). The result of this research showed that the teachers used 6 types of oral feedback, namely correction, recast, clarificationrequest, metalinguistic feedback, elicitation and repetitionfrom the theory of (Lightbown and Spada, 1999). However, the average of teachers’ oral feedback use showed a low percen teachers employed oral feedback because of teachers’ responsibility and obligation to provide it, the effective and efficient feedback mode, the utility of oral feedback, positive effect to students, and consequences of none of oral feedback.Through a stimulated recall interview, the teachers admitted that they are still not optimal in providing input to the students. Mostly, the perceived positively to oral feedback. Some students found felt sensitive to oral feedback. Nevertheless, they still realized to its positive effect on the result of their work or performance