提前执行取代运行时:神经网络预测期权波动

M. Malliaris, L. Salchenberger
{"title":"提前执行取代运行时:神经网络预测期权波动","authors":"M. Malliaris, L. Salchenberger","doi":"10.1109/CAIA.1994.323630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compares three methods of estimating the volatility of daily S&P 100 Index stock market options. The implied volatility, calculated via the Black-Scholes model, is currently the most popular method of estimating volatility and is used by traders in the pricing of options. Historical volatility has been used to predict the implied volatility, but the estimates are poor predictors. A neural network for predicting volatility is shown to be far superior to the historical method.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":297396,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do-ahead replaces run-time: a neural network forecasts options volatility\",\"authors\":\"M. Malliaris, L. Salchenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CAIA.1994.323630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Compares three methods of estimating the volatility of daily S&P 100 Index stock market options. The implied volatility, calculated via the Black-Scholes model, is currently the most popular method of estimating volatility and is used by traders in the pricing of options. Historical volatility has been used to predict the implied volatility, but the estimates are poor predictors. A neural network for predicting volatility is shown to be far superior to the historical method.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":297396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CAIA.1994.323630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CAIA.1994.323630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

比较了三种估计每日标准普尔100指数股票市场期权波动率的方法。通过Black-Scholes模型计算的隐含波动率是目前最流行的估计波动率的方法,被交易者用于期权定价。历史波动率已被用来预测隐含波动率,但估计是较差的预测。神经网络预测波动率的效果远远优于历史方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do-ahead replaces run-time: a neural network forecasts options volatility
Compares three methods of estimating the volatility of daily S&P 100 Index stock market options. The implied volatility, calculated via the Black-Scholes model, is currently the most popular method of estimating volatility and is used by traders in the pricing of options. Historical volatility has been used to predict the implied volatility, but the estimates are poor predictors. A neural network for predicting volatility is shown to be far superior to the historical method.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信