重新配置阿基洛科斯:纸莎草和碑文如何改变阿基洛科斯的抑扬格和挽歌诗的观念?(2020)

E. Bowie
{"title":"重新配置阿基洛科斯:纸莎草和碑文如何改变阿基洛科斯的抑扬格和挽歌诗的观念?(2020)","authors":"E. Bowie","doi":"10.1017/9781107415423.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THIS paper explores the ways in which the publication of new texts preserved on papyri and inscriptions substantially changed our understanding of what a book of Archilochus’ iambic or elegiac poetry would have been like. The papyri (of which the first was published in 1891, but the majority in the 1920s and 1950s) showed that Archilochus’ iamboi had at least as much narrative as invective—narrative relating to polis concerns like war (also attested in epigraphic snippets) and to the private, and especially sexual, life of the persona loquens. This last was most strikingly shown by the Cologne epodes published in 1974. The elegiac corpus, whose few quoted poems or fragments were chiefly sympotic and encouraged a view of Archilochus’ poetic persona as antiheroic, benefited less than iambi from papyrus finds until in 2005 the Oxyrhychus ‘Telephus’ was published. Its 25 lines narrating Telephus’ rout of the Achaeans who disembarked in Mysia, mistaking it for Troy, corroborated the underexploited indications of Longinus and Dio that Archilochus used elegiacs for mythical narrative.","PeriodicalId":143964,"journal":{"name":"Essays on Ancient Greek Literature and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconfiguring Archilochus: How have Papyri and Inscriptions changed Perceptions of Archilochus’ Iambic and Elegiac Poetry? (2020)\",\"authors\":\"E. Bowie\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781107415423.039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"THIS paper explores the ways in which the publication of new texts preserved on papyri and inscriptions substantially changed our understanding of what a book of Archilochus’ iambic or elegiac poetry would have been like. The papyri (of which the first was published in 1891, but the majority in the 1920s and 1950s) showed that Archilochus’ iamboi had at least as much narrative as invective—narrative relating to polis concerns like war (also attested in epigraphic snippets) and to the private, and especially sexual, life of the persona loquens. This last was most strikingly shown by the Cologne epodes published in 1974. The elegiac corpus, whose few quoted poems or fragments were chiefly sympotic and encouraged a view of Archilochus’ poetic persona as antiheroic, benefited less than iambi from papyrus finds until in 2005 the Oxyrhychus ‘Telephus’ was published. Its 25 lines narrating Telephus’ rout of the Achaeans who disembarked in Mysia, mistaking it for Troy, corroborated the underexploited indications of Longinus and Dio that Archilochus used elegiacs for mythical narrative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Essays on Ancient Greek Literature and Culture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Essays on Ancient Greek Literature and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107415423.039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Essays on Ancient Greek Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107415423.039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了保存在纸莎草纸和铭文上的新文本的出版是如何极大地改变了我们对阿基洛科斯的抑扬格诗或挽歌的理解。这些纸莎草纸(其中第一份于1891年出版,但大部分在20世纪20年代和50年代出版)表明,阿奇洛库斯的《iamboi》至少有与谩骂一样多的叙事——与城邦的问题(如战争,也在铭文片段中得到证实)和私人生活,尤其是性生活有关的人的生活。最后一点在1974年发表的《科隆报告》中得到了最引人注目的证明。挽歌语料库中引用的几首诗或片段主要是象征性的,并鼓励人们认为阿基洛库斯的诗歌人格是反英雄的,直到2005年,俄克西rhychus的《Telephus》出版,它才从纸莎草纸的发现中获得了比iambi少的好处。它的25行诗叙述了特勒弗斯击溃了在密西亚登陆的亚该亚人,把密西亚误认为特洛伊,证实了阿基洛科斯用挽歌作为神话叙事的未充分利用的迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconfiguring Archilochus: How have Papyri and Inscriptions changed Perceptions of Archilochus’ Iambic and Elegiac Poetry? (2020)
THIS paper explores the ways in which the publication of new texts preserved on papyri and inscriptions substantially changed our understanding of what a book of Archilochus’ iambic or elegiac poetry would have been like. The papyri (of which the first was published in 1891, but the majority in the 1920s and 1950s) showed that Archilochus’ iamboi had at least as much narrative as invective—narrative relating to polis concerns like war (also attested in epigraphic snippets) and to the private, and especially sexual, life of the persona loquens. This last was most strikingly shown by the Cologne epodes published in 1974. The elegiac corpus, whose few quoted poems or fragments were chiefly sympotic and encouraged a view of Archilochus’ poetic persona as antiheroic, benefited less than iambi from papyrus finds until in 2005 the Oxyrhychus ‘Telephus’ was published. Its 25 lines narrating Telephus’ rout of the Achaeans who disembarked in Mysia, mistaking it for Troy, corroborated the underexploited indications of Longinus and Dio that Archilochus used elegiacs for mythical narrative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信