评估地震荷载作用下的大型地上储罐:第1部分-封闭解和等效静力分析

P. E. Prueter, S. R. Kummari
{"title":"评估地震荷载作用下的大型地上储罐:第1部分-封闭解和等效静力分析","authors":"P. E. Prueter, S. R. Kummari","doi":"10.1115/PVP2018-84836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluating the dynamic response of large, aboveground storage tanks exposed to seismic loading is multifaceted. There are foundation-structure and fluid-structure interaction effects that can influence the overall tank behavior and likely failure modes. Additionally, local stresses at anchor bolt support chair attachments and the shell-to-floor junction can be difficult to quantify without detailed finite element analysis (FEA). Often times, performing explicit dynamic analysis with liquid sloshing effects can be time consuming, expensive, and even impractical. The intent of this paper is to summarize simplified analysis techniques that can be leveraged to evaluate aboveground storage tanks subject to seismic loading.\n Closed-form calculations to establish a recommended design for a tank, including seismic considerations, are available in storage tank design standards, including API 650 [1] (Appendix E). Seismic design standards have evolved significantly in recent years. Furthermore, for many vintage, in-service storage tanks, explicit seismic considerations were not incorporated into the original design. In Part I of this study, these design equations and other closed-form solutions are used to evaluate the structural integrity of a large, in-service, mechanically-anchored storage tank. The design equations in API 650 [1] are used to form the basis of simplified, equivalent static analysis, where seismic loads are applied to a three-dimensional FEA model via equivalent lateral body forces. These practical results are then compared to explicit dynamic seismic behavior of the same tank with fluid-structure interaction effects considered (in Part II of this study [2]). These comparisons offer insight into the appropriateness of using simplified hand-calculations and equivalent static analysis (and their relative conservatism) in lieu of more rigorous explicit dynamic and fluid sloshing simulations.","PeriodicalId":180537,"journal":{"name":"Volume 8: Seismic Engineering","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Large Aboveground Storage Tanks Subject to Seismic Loading: Part I — Closed-Form Solutions and Equivalent Static Analysis\",\"authors\":\"P. E. Prueter, S. R. Kummari\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/PVP2018-84836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evaluating the dynamic response of large, aboveground storage tanks exposed to seismic loading is multifaceted. There are foundation-structure and fluid-structure interaction effects that can influence the overall tank behavior and likely failure modes. Additionally, local stresses at anchor bolt support chair attachments and the shell-to-floor junction can be difficult to quantify without detailed finite element analysis (FEA). Often times, performing explicit dynamic analysis with liquid sloshing effects can be time consuming, expensive, and even impractical. The intent of this paper is to summarize simplified analysis techniques that can be leveraged to evaluate aboveground storage tanks subject to seismic loading.\\n Closed-form calculations to establish a recommended design for a tank, including seismic considerations, are available in storage tank design standards, including API 650 [1] (Appendix E). Seismic design standards have evolved significantly in recent years. Furthermore, for many vintage, in-service storage tanks, explicit seismic considerations were not incorporated into the original design. In Part I of this study, these design equations and other closed-form solutions are used to evaluate the structural integrity of a large, in-service, mechanically-anchored storage tank. The design equations in API 650 [1] are used to form the basis of simplified, equivalent static analysis, where seismic loads are applied to a three-dimensional FEA model via equivalent lateral body forces. These practical results are then compared to explicit dynamic seismic behavior of the same tank with fluid-structure interaction effects considered (in Part II of this study [2]). These comparisons offer insight into the appropriateness of using simplified hand-calculations and equivalent static analysis (and their relative conservatism) in lieu of more rigorous explicit dynamic and fluid sloshing simulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 8: Seismic Engineering\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 8: Seismic Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 8: Seismic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估大型地上储罐在地震荷载作用下的动力响应是多方面的。基础-结构和流固耦合效应会影响储罐的整体性能和可能的破坏模式。此外,如果没有详细的有限元分析(FEA),锚栓支撑椅附件和壳-底板连接处的局部应力很难量化。通常,使用液体晃动效果执行显式动态分析既耗时又昂贵,甚至不切实际。本文的目的是总结简化的分析技术,可以用来评估地震荷载作用下的地上储罐。在储罐设计标准(包括API 650[1](附录E))中,可以使用封闭式计算来建立储罐的推荐设计,包括抗震考虑因素。近年来,抗震设计标准发生了重大变化。此外,对于许多老式的、在役的储罐,明确的抗震考虑并没有纳入原始设计。在本研究的第一部分中,使用这些设计方程和其他封闭形式的解来评估一个在役的大型机械锚定储罐的结构完整性。采用API 650[1]中的设计方程作为简化等效静力分析的基础,其中地震荷载通过等效侧体力作用于三维有限元模型。然后将这些实际结果与考虑流固耦合效应的同一水箱的显式动力地震行为进行比较(在本研究的第二部分[2]中)。这些比较提供了使用简化的手工计算和等效的静态分析(及其相对保守性)代替更严格的明确的动态和流体晃动模拟的适当性的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Large Aboveground Storage Tanks Subject to Seismic Loading: Part I — Closed-Form Solutions and Equivalent Static Analysis
Evaluating the dynamic response of large, aboveground storage tanks exposed to seismic loading is multifaceted. There are foundation-structure and fluid-structure interaction effects that can influence the overall tank behavior and likely failure modes. Additionally, local stresses at anchor bolt support chair attachments and the shell-to-floor junction can be difficult to quantify without detailed finite element analysis (FEA). Often times, performing explicit dynamic analysis with liquid sloshing effects can be time consuming, expensive, and even impractical. The intent of this paper is to summarize simplified analysis techniques that can be leveraged to evaluate aboveground storage tanks subject to seismic loading. Closed-form calculations to establish a recommended design for a tank, including seismic considerations, are available in storage tank design standards, including API 650 [1] (Appendix E). Seismic design standards have evolved significantly in recent years. Furthermore, for many vintage, in-service storage tanks, explicit seismic considerations were not incorporated into the original design. In Part I of this study, these design equations and other closed-form solutions are used to evaluate the structural integrity of a large, in-service, mechanically-anchored storage tank. The design equations in API 650 [1] are used to form the basis of simplified, equivalent static analysis, where seismic loads are applied to a three-dimensional FEA model via equivalent lateral body forces. These practical results are then compared to explicit dynamic seismic behavior of the same tank with fluid-structure interaction effects considered (in Part II of this study [2]). These comparisons offer insight into the appropriateness of using simplified hand-calculations and equivalent static analysis (and their relative conservatism) in lieu of more rigorous explicit dynamic and fluid sloshing simulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信