使用ISO标准教授软件工程

ACM Stand. Pub Date : 1996-09-01 DOI:10.1145/240819.240825
A. Abran
{"title":"使用ISO标准教授软件工程","authors":"A. Abran","doi":"10.1145/240819.240825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ⅵ Standards are designed to promote the efficient use of technology; they can be seen as structured and prepackaged , agreed-upon best practices for specific technologies. Teaching can be viewed as a technology transfer process, and the use of standards can facilitate this process. This paper discusses the uses of both ISO standards and work-in-progress documents in designing and teaching graduate courses in software engineering , it also discusses the approach selected to illustrate to graduate students how an accepted body of knowledge is developed and agreed upon by a group of domain experts. The teaching method involves class simulations of the review process of ISO work sessions and international voting. Lessons learned from both learning and teaching perspectives are also presented. oftware engineering course materials are often based on either textbooks or fairly specialized and research oriented academic papers. Both are useful; however, they often reflect the personal views of individual experts—their own experience , perspectives and biases. In other engineering disciplines, teaching material is based on a common body of knowledge agreed upon by certification bodies, such as professional engineering boards, which review and approve the curriculum of engineering disciplines taught at the university level. Furthermore, standards are key components of the engineering disciplines. Unfortunately, in software engineering there is not yet an agreed-upon core body of codified knowledge, no certification body and, until fairly recently, a scarcity of accepted standards addressing specific software engineering topics. Consequently, for both undergraduate and graduate courses in software engineering, there is a lack of teaching material based on software engineering standards. A handful of countries have developed some national standards in software engineering. However, these national standards sometimes reflect strong cultural biases which make them difficult to use in an international context. Fortunately, some international standards on software engineering are making their way through the ISO subcommittee on software engineering (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7); within this subcommittee there are nine subgroups currently working on software engineering topics. This means that, although only 14 software engineering standards have been published to date, a vast array of material is available (as of June 1996) in draft format, through national standards bodies: 4 draft international standards (DIS), 10 committee drafts (CD) and 20 working drafts (WD), plus an unspecified number of documents that have not yet reached the working draft stage. Standards are designed to promote the efficient use of technology, and can be seen as …","PeriodicalId":270594,"journal":{"name":"ACM Stand.","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching software engineering using ISO standards\",\"authors\":\"A. Abran\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/240819.240825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ⅵ Standards are designed to promote the efficient use of technology; they can be seen as structured and prepackaged , agreed-upon best practices for specific technologies. Teaching can be viewed as a technology transfer process, and the use of standards can facilitate this process. This paper discusses the uses of both ISO standards and work-in-progress documents in designing and teaching graduate courses in software engineering , it also discusses the approach selected to illustrate to graduate students how an accepted body of knowledge is developed and agreed upon by a group of domain experts. The teaching method involves class simulations of the review process of ISO work sessions and international voting. Lessons learned from both learning and teaching perspectives are also presented. oftware engineering course materials are often based on either textbooks or fairly specialized and research oriented academic papers. Both are useful; however, they often reflect the personal views of individual experts—their own experience , perspectives and biases. In other engineering disciplines, teaching material is based on a common body of knowledge agreed upon by certification bodies, such as professional engineering boards, which review and approve the curriculum of engineering disciplines taught at the university level. Furthermore, standards are key components of the engineering disciplines. Unfortunately, in software engineering there is not yet an agreed-upon core body of codified knowledge, no certification body and, until fairly recently, a scarcity of accepted standards addressing specific software engineering topics. Consequently, for both undergraduate and graduate courses in software engineering, there is a lack of teaching material based on software engineering standards. A handful of countries have developed some national standards in software engineering. However, these national standards sometimes reflect strong cultural biases which make them difficult to use in an international context. Fortunately, some international standards on software engineering are making their way through the ISO subcommittee on software engineering (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7); within this subcommittee there are nine subgroups currently working on software engineering topics. This means that, although only 14 software engineering standards have been published to date, a vast array of material is available (as of June 1996) in draft format, through national standards bodies: 4 draft international standards (DIS), 10 committee drafts (CD) and 20 working drafts (WD), plus an unspecified number of documents that have not yet reached the working draft stage. Standards are designed to promote the efficient use of technology, and can be seen as …\",\"PeriodicalId\":270594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Stand.\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Stand.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/240819.240825\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Stand.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/240819.240825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

Ⅵ制定标准是为了促进技术的有效利用;它们可以被看作是结构化的、预先打包的、针对特定技术商定的最佳实践。教学可以看作是一个技术转移的过程,标准的使用可以促进这一过程。本文讨论了在软件工程研究生课程的设计和教学中ISO标准和正在进行的文档的使用,它还讨论了选择的方法来向研究生说明一个公认的知识体系是如何被一组领域专家开发和商定的。教学方法包括课堂模拟ISO工作会议的审查过程和国际投票。从学习和教学的角度也提出了经验教训。软件工程课程材料通常基于教科书或相当专业的研究导向的学术论文。两者都是有用的;然而,它们往往反映了个别专家的个人观点——他们自己的经验、观点和偏见。在其他工程学科中,教材是基于认证机构(如专业工程委员会)认可的共同知识体系,这些认证机构审查和批准大学水平的工程学科课程。此外,标准是工程学科的关键组成部分。不幸的是,在软件工程中,还没有一个公认的编纂知识的核心主体,没有认证主体,而且直到最近,还缺乏针对特定软件工程主题的公认标准。因此,对于软件工程的本科和研究生课程来说,都缺乏基于软件工程标准的教材。少数几个国家已经制定了一些软件工程方面的国家标准。然而,这些国家标准有时反映出强烈的文化偏见,这使得它们难以在国际背景下使用。幸运的是,一些关于软件工程的国际标准正在通过ISO软件工程分委员会(ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7);在这个小组委员会中,目前有9个子小组研究软件工程主题。这意味着,尽管到目前为止只有14个软件工程标准被发布,但是大量的材料(截至1996年6月)可以通过国家标准机构以草案的形式获得:4个国际标准草案(DIS), 10个委员会草案(CD)和20个工作草案(WD),加上尚未达到工作草案阶段的未指定数量的文档。标准是为了促进技术的有效利用而设计的,可以被视为……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teaching software engineering using ISO standards
Ⅵ Standards are designed to promote the efficient use of technology; they can be seen as structured and prepackaged , agreed-upon best practices for specific technologies. Teaching can be viewed as a technology transfer process, and the use of standards can facilitate this process. This paper discusses the uses of both ISO standards and work-in-progress documents in designing and teaching graduate courses in software engineering , it also discusses the approach selected to illustrate to graduate students how an accepted body of knowledge is developed and agreed upon by a group of domain experts. The teaching method involves class simulations of the review process of ISO work sessions and international voting. Lessons learned from both learning and teaching perspectives are also presented. oftware engineering course materials are often based on either textbooks or fairly specialized and research oriented academic papers. Both are useful; however, they often reflect the personal views of individual experts—their own experience , perspectives and biases. In other engineering disciplines, teaching material is based on a common body of knowledge agreed upon by certification bodies, such as professional engineering boards, which review and approve the curriculum of engineering disciplines taught at the university level. Furthermore, standards are key components of the engineering disciplines. Unfortunately, in software engineering there is not yet an agreed-upon core body of codified knowledge, no certification body and, until fairly recently, a scarcity of accepted standards addressing specific software engineering topics. Consequently, for both undergraduate and graduate courses in software engineering, there is a lack of teaching material based on software engineering standards. A handful of countries have developed some national standards in software engineering. However, these national standards sometimes reflect strong cultural biases which make them difficult to use in an international context. Fortunately, some international standards on software engineering are making their way through the ISO subcommittee on software engineering (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7); within this subcommittee there are nine subgroups currently working on software engineering topics. This means that, although only 14 software engineering standards have been published to date, a vast array of material is available (as of June 1996) in draft format, through national standards bodies: 4 draft international standards (DIS), 10 committee drafts (CD) and 20 working drafts (WD), plus an unspecified number of documents that have not yet reached the working draft stage. Standards are designed to promote the efficient use of technology, and can be seen as …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信