孤立和上下文中的韵律最小化

KevinM . Ryan
{"title":"孤立和上下文中的韵律最小化","authors":"KevinM . Ryan","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198817949.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prosodic minimality refers to the minimum size requirements that languages impose on prosodic words. To date, nearly all research on prosodic minimality considers the prosodic word in isolation. This chapter summarizes this literature but focuses rather on the phonological analysis of minima in the context of larger prosodic constituents, a domain that reveals new issues. In particular, resyllabification across words can threaten minima (as when CVC words resyllabify), to which languages can respond either by suppressing resyllabification if it threatens minimality, by allowing resyllabification but repairing the word through lengthening, or by letting the resulting degenerate word stand as such. Case studies of Prakrit, Tamil, and Latin illustrate these three possibilities, respectively. Tamil is of further interest because only a subset of its coda consonants contribute to minimality. Evidence converges from across systems that its two rhotics fail to bear weight, despite being highly sonorous coda consonants.","PeriodicalId":333030,"journal":{"name":"Prosodic Weight","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prosodic minimality in isolation and in context\",\"authors\":\"KevinM . Ryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780198817949.003.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prosodic minimality refers to the minimum size requirements that languages impose on prosodic words. To date, nearly all research on prosodic minimality considers the prosodic word in isolation. This chapter summarizes this literature but focuses rather on the phonological analysis of minima in the context of larger prosodic constituents, a domain that reveals new issues. In particular, resyllabification across words can threaten minima (as when CVC words resyllabify), to which languages can respond either by suppressing resyllabification if it threatens minimality, by allowing resyllabification but repairing the word through lengthening, or by letting the resulting degenerate word stand as such. Case studies of Prakrit, Tamil, and Latin illustrate these three possibilities, respectively. Tamil is of further interest because only a subset of its coda consonants contribute to minimality. Evidence converges from across systems that its two rhotics fail to bear weight, despite being highly sonorous coda consonants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prosodic Weight\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prosodic Weight\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198817949.003.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosodic Weight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198817949.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

韵律最小是指语言对韵律词的最小尺寸要求。迄今为止,几乎所有关于韵律最小化的研究都是孤立地考虑韵律词。本章总结了这些文献,但更侧重于在较大韵律成分的背景下对最小音的音系分析,这是一个揭示新问题的领域。特别是,单词之间的重音节化可能会威胁到最小值(比如当CVC单词重音节化时),对于这种情况,语言可以通过抑制重音节化(如果它威胁到最小值),或者允许重音节化,但通过延长来修复单词,或者让最终的退化单词保持原样。对印度语、泰米尔语和拉丁语的案例研究分别说明了这三种可能性。泰米尔语更令人感兴趣,因为它只有一小部分尾辅音有助于简约。来自各个系统的证据表明,它的两个辅音虽然是非常响亮的尾辅音,但却无法承受重量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prosodic minimality in isolation and in context
Prosodic minimality refers to the minimum size requirements that languages impose on prosodic words. To date, nearly all research on prosodic minimality considers the prosodic word in isolation. This chapter summarizes this literature but focuses rather on the phonological analysis of minima in the context of larger prosodic constituents, a domain that reveals new issues. In particular, resyllabification across words can threaten minima (as when CVC words resyllabify), to which languages can respond either by suppressing resyllabification if it threatens minimality, by allowing resyllabification but repairing the word through lengthening, or by letting the resulting degenerate word stand as such. Case studies of Prakrit, Tamil, and Latin illustrate these three possibilities, respectively. Tamil is of further interest because only a subset of its coda consonants contribute to minimality. Evidence converges from across systems that its two rhotics fail to bear weight, despite being highly sonorous coda consonants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信