神经分化文化和超越新自由主义身份政治的具体化知识

T. Beck
{"title":"神经分化文化和超越新自由主义身份政治的具体化知识","authors":"T. Beck","doi":"10.1177/1354067x231191489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The neurodiversity movement has influenced the way people think about mental health and disability around the world. Emerging during the turn of the 21st century, it has simultaneously incorporated ideas from mainstream science and challenged the authority of scientists and clinical professionals as the sole arbiters of what those diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders are capable of. In the process, it has spawned a unique approach to identity politics, evoking questions about the body, mind, and culture too often ignored in critiques commonly directed at it. This paper combines concepts from posthumanist, feminist, and queer theorists with writings from neurodiversity scholars and activists to highlight how differences in embodied disposition are policed under neoliberal capitalism. This sets a foundation for a nuanced understanding of neurodivergent identity as an expression of neurodiversity culture. Drawing on Karen Barad’s agential realism, neurodivergence is construed as a form of agency produced through processes of disidentification with mainstream cultural norms rather than identification with a particular social category. It is suggested that any critique of the neurodiversity movement should account for how those who participate in it use its language to distance themselves from neoliberal institutional norms and engender community through a counterculture of embodied knowledge.","PeriodicalId":309184,"journal":{"name":"Culture & Psychology","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurodivergent culture and embodied knowledge beyond neoliberal identity politics\",\"authors\":\"T. Beck\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1354067x231191489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The neurodiversity movement has influenced the way people think about mental health and disability around the world. Emerging during the turn of the 21st century, it has simultaneously incorporated ideas from mainstream science and challenged the authority of scientists and clinical professionals as the sole arbiters of what those diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders are capable of. In the process, it has spawned a unique approach to identity politics, evoking questions about the body, mind, and culture too often ignored in critiques commonly directed at it. This paper combines concepts from posthumanist, feminist, and queer theorists with writings from neurodiversity scholars and activists to highlight how differences in embodied disposition are policed under neoliberal capitalism. This sets a foundation for a nuanced understanding of neurodivergent identity as an expression of neurodiversity culture. Drawing on Karen Barad’s agential realism, neurodivergence is construed as a form of agency produced through processes of disidentification with mainstream cultural norms rather than identification with a particular social category. It is suggested that any critique of the neurodiversity movement should account for how those who participate in it use its language to distance themselves from neoliberal institutional norms and engender community through a counterculture of embodied knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture & Psychology\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture & Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x231191489\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x231191489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经多样性运动影响了全世界人们对精神健康和残疾的看法。它出现在21世纪之交,它同时吸收了主流科学的思想,并挑战了科学家和临床专业人员作为神经发育障碍患者能力的唯一仲裁者的权威。在这个过程中,它催生了一种独特的身份政治方法,引发了关于身体、思想和文化的问题,而这些问题在通常针对它的批评中往往被忽视。本文将后人类主义、女权主义和酷儿理论家的概念与神经多样性学者和活动家的著作结合起来,强调在新自由主义资本主义下,体现性格的差异是如何被监管的。这为细致入微地理解神经发散性身份作为神经多样性文化的一种表达奠定了基础。借鉴Karen Barad的代理现实主义,神经分化被解释为一种代理形式,通过对主流文化规范的不认同过程产生,而不是对特定社会类别的认同。有人建议,对神经多样性运动的任何批评都应该解释那些参与其中的人如何使用其语言将自己与新自由主义制度规范拉开距离,并通过体现知识的反文化产生社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neurodivergent culture and embodied knowledge beyond neoliberal identity politics
The neurodiversity movement has influenced the way people think about mental health and disability around the world. Emerging during the turn of the 21st century, it has simultaneously incorporated ideas from mainstream science and challenged the authority of scientists and clinical professionals as the sole arbiters of what those diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders are capable of. In the process, it has spawned a unique approach to identity politics, evoking questions about the body, mind, and culture too often ignored in critiques commonly directed at it. This paper combines concepts from posthumanist, feminist, and queer theorists with writings from neurodiversity scholars and activists to highlight how differences in embodied disposition are policed under neoliberal capitalism. This sets a foundation for a nuanced understanding of neurodivergent identity as an expression of neurodiversity culture. Drawing on Karen Barad’s agential realism, neurodivergence is construed as a form of agency produced through processes of disidentification with mainstream cultural norms rather than identification with a particular social category. It is suggested that any critique of the neurodiversity movement should account for how those who participate in it use its language to distance themselves from neoliberal institutional norms and engender community through a counterculture of embodied knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信