1968年5月的电影:政治过去的复兴

Laurence Besnard-Scott
{"title":"1968年5月的电影:政治过去的复兴","authors":"Laurence Besnard-Scott","doi":"10.1386/aps_00003_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Simone Weil's view that 'there is more of eternity in the past than in the present' may appear unexpected from a writer who is mostly known for her revolutionary and progressive texts, for she seems to defend a regression to a lost past; at least at first reading\n and if one solely reads it from a historicist perspective. On closer look, her reflections on time, originally written in French in the mid-1950s, are strangely relevant to our present time and its tendency to patronize the past. The 1968 events, and how we tend to perceive them in the now,\n are a case in point. Exploring the legacy of this collective protest as recorded on documentary films provides us with the opportunity to rediscover a particular kind of political activism that seems to be absent today, either absorbed into a broader mainstream culture, discredited as utopian\n or reduced to mere anachronism. Why should these artefacts still be viewed as evidence of the real world? And how do they materialize and sustain protest memory?","PeriodicalId":311280,"journal":{"name":"Art & the Public Sphere","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"May '68 on film: The renaissance of a political past\",\"authors\":\"Laurence Besnard-Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/aps_00003_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Simone Weil's view that 'there is more of eternity in the past than in the present' may appear unexpected from a writer who is mostly known for her revolutionary and progressive texts, for she seems to defend a regression to a lost past; at least at first reading\\n and if one solely reads it from a historicist perspective. On closer look, her reflections on time, originally written in French in the mid-1950s, are strangely relevant to our present time and its tendency to patronize the past. The 1968 events, and how we tend to perceive them in the now,\\n are a case in point. Exploring the legacy of this collective protest as recorded on documentary films provides us with the opportunity to rediscover a particular kind of political activism that seems to be absent today, either absorbed into a broader mainstream culture, discredited as utopian\\n or reduced to mere anachronism. Why should these artefacts still be viewed as evidence of the real world? And how do they materialize and sustain protest memory?\",\"PeriodicalId\":311280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Art & the Public Sphere\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Art & the Public Sphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/aps_00003_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art & the Public Sphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/aps_00003_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

西蒙娜·韦尔(Simone Weil)认为“过去比现在有更多的永恒”,这一观点可能出乎一位以革命和进步主义作品而闻名的作家的意料之外,因为她似乎在捍卫一种向失落的过去的回归;至少初读时是这样,如果你只从历史主义的角度来读的话。仔细一看,她对时间的思考,最初是在20世纪50年代中期用法语写的,奇怪地与我们现在的时代以及它对过去的光顾倾向有关。1968年的事件,以及我们现在倾向于如何看待它们,就是一个很好的例子。探索记录在纪录片中的这种集体抗议的遗产,为我们提供了一个机会,让我们重新发现一种特殊的政治激进主义,这种政治激进主义在今天似乎已经缺席,要么被更广泛的主流文化所吸收,要么被认为是乌托邦式的,要么被贬为纯粹的时代错误。为什么这些人工制品仍然被视为真实世界的证据?他们是如何将抗议记忆具体化并维持下去的?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
May '68 on film: The renaissance of a political past
Abstract Simone Weil's view that 'there is more of eternity in the past than in the present' may appear unexpected from a writer who is mostly known for her revolutionary and progressive texts, for she seems to defend a regression to a lost past; at least at first reading and if one solely reads it from a historicist perspective. On closer look, her reflections on time, originally written in French in the mid-1950s, are strangely relevant to our present time and its tendency to patronize the past. The 1968 events, and how we tend to perceive them in the now, are a case in point. Exploring the legacy of this collective protest as recorded on documentary films provides us with the opportunity to rediscover a particular kind of political activism that seems to be absent today, either absorbed into a broader mainstream culture, discredited as utopian or reduced to mere anachronism. Why should these artefacts still be viewed as evidence of the real world? And how do they materialize and sustain protest memory?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信