软件操作概要与测试概要:走向更好的软件测试策略

Luiz Cavamura Júnior, Ricardo Morimoto, S. Fabbri, A. C. Paiva, A. Vincenzi
{"title":"软件操作概要与测试概要:走向更好的软件测试策略","authors":"Luiz Cavamura Júnior, Ricardo Morimoto, S. Fabbri, A. C. Paiva, A. Vincenzi","doi":"10.5753/jserd.2020.546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software Operational Profile (SOP) is a software specification based on how users use the software. This specification corresponds to a quantitative representation of software that identifies the most used software parts. As software reliability depends on the context in which users operate the software, the SOP is used in software reliability engineering. However, there are evidences of a misalignment between the software tested parts and SOP. Therefore, this paper investigates a possible misalignment between SOP and the tested software parts to obtain, based on experimental data, more evidence of this misalignment. We performed an exploratory study composed of four activities to verify: a) whether there are significant variations in how users operate the software; b) whether there is a misalignment between SOP and the tested software parts; c) if failures occur in untested SOP parts in case of misalignment; d) in case of misalignment between SOP and untested software parts, whether a test strategy based on the amplification of the existent test set with additional test data generated automatically, can contribute to reduce the misalignment. We collected data form four software while users were operating them. We analyzed this collected data in an attempt to reach the goals of this work. To evaluate the originality of this research, we performed a Literature Systematic Review (SLR) and presented its conclusions. The obtained results evidence that there are significant variations in how users operate the software and also that there is a misalignment between SOP and the tested software parts when we evaluated the four software mentioned above. There are also indications of the occurrence of failures in the untested SOP parts. Although the test strategy mentioned above has reduced the possible misalignment, the test strategy is not enough to avoid it, thus denoting the need of specifics test strategies using SOP as a test criterion. These results indicate that SOP becomes relevant not only to software reliability engineering but also to contribute to testing activities, regardless of the adopted strategy.","PeriodicalId":189472,"journal":{"name":"J. Softw. Eng. Res. Dev.","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Software Operational Profile vs. Test Profile: Towards a Better Software Testing Strategy\",\"authors\":\"Luiz Cavamura Júnior, Ricardo Morimoto, S. Fabbri, A. C. Paiva, A. Vincenzi\",\"doi\":\"10.5753/jserd.2020.546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software Operational Profile (SOP) is a software specification based on how users use the software. This specification corresponds to a quantitative representation of software that identifies the most used software parts. As software reliability depends on the context in which users operate the software, the SOP is used in software reliability engineering. However, there are evidences of a misalignment between the software tested parts and SOP. Therefore, this paper investigates a possible misalignment between SOP and the tested software parts to obtain, based on experimental data, more evidence of this misalignment. We performed an exploratory study composed of four activities to verify: a) whether there are significant variations in how users operate the software; b) whether there is a misalignment between SOP and the tested software parts; c) if failures occur in untested SOP parts in case of misalignment; d) in case of misalignment between SOP and untested software parts, whether a test strategy based on the amplification of the existent test set with additional test data generated automatically, can contribute to reduce the misalignment. We collected data form four software while users were operating them. We analyzed this collected data in an attempt to reach the goals of this work. To evaluate the originality of this research, we performed a Literature Systematic Review (SLR) and presented its conclusions. The obtained results evidence that there are significant variations in how users operate the software and also that there is a misalignment between SOP and the tested software parts when we evaluated the four software mentioned above. There are also indications of the occurrence of failures in the untested SOP parts. Although the test strategy mentioned above has reduced the possible misalignment, the test strategy is not enough to avoid it, thus denoting the need of specifics test strategies using SOP as a test criterion. These results indicate that SOP becomes relevant not only to software reliability engineering but also to contribute to testing activities, regardless of the adopted strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Softw. Eng. Res. Dev.\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Softw. Eng. Res. Dev.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5753/jserd.2020.546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Softw. Eng. Res. Dev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5753/jserd.2020.546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

SOP (Software Operational Profile)是一种基于用户如何使用软件的软件规范。该规范对应于识别最常用软件部分的软件的定量表示。由于软件的可靠性取决于用户操作软件的环境,因此在软件可靠性工程中使用SOP。然而,在软件测试部分和SOP之间存在不一致的证据。因此,本文调查了SOP与被测软件部分之间可能存在的偏差,以根据实验数据获得更多这种偏差的证据。我们进行了一项由四项活动组成的探索性研究,以验证:a)用户操作软件的方式是否存在显著差异;b) SOP与被测软件部分是否不一致;c)如果未检测的SOP零件在不对中情况下发生故障;d)在SOP与未测试软件部分不一致的情况下,基于现有测试集的扩大,自动生成额外测试数据的测试策略是否有助于减少不一致。我们收集了用户在使用四个软件时的数据。我们分析这些收集到的数据,试图达到这项工作的目标。为了评估本研究的原创性,我们进行了文献系统综述(SLR)并提出了结论。获得的结果证明,在用户操作软件的方式上存在显著的差异,并且当我们评估上面提到的四个软件时,SOP和被测试的软件部分之间存在不一致。在未测试的SOP零件中也有发生故障的迹象。尽管上面提到的测试策略已经减少了可能的不一致,但是测试策略还不足以避免它,因此表明需要使用SOP作为测试标准的特定测试策略。这些结果表明SOP不仅与软件可靠性工程相关,而且与测试活动相关,无论采用何种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Software Operational Profile vs. Test Profile: Towards a Better Software Testing Strategy
Software Operational Profile (SOP) is a software specification based on how users use the software. This specification corresponds to a quantitative representation of software that identifies the most used software parts. As software reliability depends on the context in which users operate the software, the SOP is used in software reliability engineering. However, there are evidences of a misalignment between the software tested parts and SOP. Therefore, this paper investigates a possible misalignment between SOP and the tested software parts to obtain, based on experimental data, more evidence of this misalignment. We performed an exploratory study composed of four activities to verify: a) whether there are significant variations in how users operate the software; b) whether there is a misalignment between SOP and the tested software parts; c) if failures occur in untested SOP parts in case of misalignment; d) in case of misalignment between SOP and untested software parts, whether a test strategy based on the amplification of the existent test set with additional test data generated automatically, can contribute to reduce the misalignment. We collected data form four software while users were operating them. We analyzed this collected data in an attempt to reach the goals of this work. To evaluate the originality of this research, we performed a Literature Systematic Review (SLR) and presented its conclusions. The obtained results evidence that there are significant variations in how users operate the software and also that there is a misalignment between SOP and the tested software parts when we evaluated the four software mentioned above. There are also indications of the occurrence of failures in the untested SOP parts. Although the test strategy mentioned above has reduced the possible misalignment, the test strategy is not enough to avoid it, thus denoting the need of specifics test strategies using SOP as a test criterion. These results indicate that SOP becomes relevant not only to software reliability engineering but also to contribute to testing activities, regardless of the adopted strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信