单通道与三通道CFD跨声速压气机转子失速点预测的比较

Benjamin Meinster, W. Smith, G. Hobson, A. Gannon
{"title":"单通道与三通道CFD跨声速压气机转子失速点预测的比较","authors":"Benjamin Meinster, W. Smith, G. Hobson, A. Gannon","doi":"10.1115/gt2022-83478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n An investigation is presented which compares the predicted stall points and underlying flow fields for single-passage and three-passage CFD geometries of a transonic axial compressor rotor. The two cases are run using the commercial CFD code ANSYS CFX and compared to experimental data. The two predicted stall points are found to differ from each other, and both under-predict the rotor’s performance compared to the experimental data. However, the steady-state flow fields are found to be identical for all operating points short of the stall point. A mechanism is then proposed to reconcile the difference in predicted stall points with the identical steady-state flow fields. By the mechanism proposed, the addition of multiple passages makes flow through the three-blade geometry less stable, which causes the rotor to stall earlier.","PeriodicalId":191970,"journal":{"name":"Volume 10C: Turbomachinery — Design Methods and CFD Modeling for Turbomachinery; Ducts, Noise, and Component Interactions","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Stall Point Predictions in a Transonic Axial Compressor Rotor Using Single Passage and Three Passage CFD Geometries\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Meinster, W. Smith, G. Hobson, A. Gannon\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/gt2022-83478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n An investigation is presented which compares the predicted stall points and underlying flow fields for single-passage and three-passage CFD geometries of a transonic axial compressor rotor. The two cases are run using the commercial CFD code ANSYS CFX and compared to experimental data. The two predicted stall points are found to differ from each other, and both under-predict the rotor’s performance compared to the experimental data. However, the steady-state flow fields are found to be identical for all operating points short of the stall point. A mechanism is then proposed to reconcile the difference in predicted stall points with the identical steady-state flow fields. By the mechanism proposed, the addition of multiple passages makes flow through the three-blade geometry less stable, which causes the rotor to stall earlier.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 10C: Turbomachinery — Design Methods and CFD Modeling for Turbomachinery; Ducts, Noise, and Component Interactions\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 10C: Turbomachinery — Design Methods and CFD Modeling for Turbomachinery; Ducts, Noise, and Component Interactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2022-83478\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 10C: Turbomachinery — Design Methods and CFD Modeling for Turbomachinery; Ducts, Noise, and Component Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2022-83478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对跨声速轴流压气机转子的单通道和三通道CFD几何模型的失速点和下伏流场进行了比较研究。利用商业CFD软件ANSYS CFX对两种情况进行了计算,并与实验数据进行了对比。发现两种预测失速点存在差异,并且与实验数据相比都低估了转子的性能。然而,除了失速点外,所有工作点的稳态流场都是相同的。然后提出了一种机制来调和预测失速点的差异与相同的稳态流场。根据所提出的机理,多通道的增加使流经三叶片几何形状的流动不稳定,从而导致转子更早失速。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Stall Point Predictions in a Transonic Axial Compressor Rotor Using Single Passage and Three Passage CFD Geometries
An investigation is presented which compares the predicted stall points and underlying flow fields for single-passage and three-passage CFD geometries of a transonic axial compressor rotor. The two cases are run using the commercial CFD code ANSYS CFX and compared to experimental data. The two predicted stall points are found to differ from each other, and both under-predict the rotor’s performance compared to the experimental data. However, the steady-state flow fields are found to be identical for all operating points short of the stall point. A mechanism is then proposed to reconcile the difference in predicted stall points with the identical steady-state flow fields. By the mechanism proposed, the addition of multiple passages makes flow through the three-blade geometry less stable, which causes the rotor to stall earlier.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信