行动中的战略

M. Rostagno, Carlo Altavilla, Giacomo Carboni, Wolfgang Lemke, Roberto Motto, Arthur Saint Guilhem, Jonathan Yiangou
{"title":"行动中的战略","authors":"M. Rostagno, Carlo Altavilla, Giacomo Carboni, Wolfgang Lemke, Roberto Motto, Arthur Saint Guilhem, Jonathan Yiangou","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192895912.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The policy framework of the European Central Bank (ECB) attracted both bouquets and brickbats in the pre-crisis era. This chapter aims to assess those arguments with hindsight: was policy successful in delivering the objective or was it instead ‘inattentive’, as some critics at the time claimed? We argue that the euro area economy faced a series of inflationary supply shocks and the policy framework was helpful in those conditions. The perceived asymmetry of the inflation objective—with a hard ‘ceiling’ at 2%—allowed automatic adjustments in underlying conditions, including inflation expectations, to do a large part of the stabilization job. However, we show that this self-stabilizing mechanism also admits a second regime: if the economy enters a situation where negative demand shocks dominate, the ‘ceiling’ ceases to bind and act as a stabilizer, leading inflation to drift downwards. We contend that the ECB may have entered such a regime after the financial crisis.","PeriodicalId":118975,"journal":{"name":"Monetary Policy in Times of Crisis","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategy in Action\",\"authors\":\"M. Rostagno, Carlo Altavilla, Giacomo Carboni, Wolfgang Lemke, Roberto Motto, Arthur Saint Guilhem, Jonathan Yiangou\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780192895912.003.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The policy framework of the European Central Bank (ECB) attracted both bouquets and brickbats in the pre-crisis era. This chapter aims to assess those arguments with hindsight: was policy successful in delivering the objective or was it instead ‘inattentive’, as some critics at the time claimed? We argue that the euro area economy faced a series of inflationary supply shocks and the policy framework was helpful in those conditions. The perceived asymmetry of the inflation objective—with a hard ‘ceiling’ at 2%—allowed automatic adjustments in underlying conditions, including inflation expectations, to do a large part of the stabilization job. However, we show that this self-stabilizing mechanism also admits a second regime: if the economy enters a situation where negative demand shocks dominate, the ‘ceiling’ ceases to bind and act as a stabilizer, leading inflation to drift downwards. We contend that the ECB may have entered such a regime after the financial crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monetary Policy in Times of Crisis\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monetary Policy in Times of Crisis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192895912.003.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monetary Policy in Times of Crisis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192895912.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在危机前,欧洲央行(ECB)的政策框架既受到了人们的追捧,也受到了人们的抨击。本章旨在事后评估这些论点:政策是成功地实现了目标,还是像当时一些批评者所说的那样“疏忽大意”?我们认为,欧元区经济面临一系列通胀供应冲击,政策框架在这些条件下是有帮助的。通胀目标的不对称性(硬性上限为2%)使得包括通胀预期在内的基本条件的自动调整在很大程度上起到了稳定通胀的作用。然而,我们表明,这种自我稳定机制也承认第二种机制:如果经济进入负面需求冲击占主导地位的情况,“天花板”就不再具有约束力,并起到稳定器的作用,导致通胀向下倾斜。我们认为,欧洲央行可能在金融危机后进入了这样一种机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategy in Action
The policy framework of the European Central Bank (ECB) attracted both bouquets and brickbats in the pre-crisis era. This chapter aims to assess those arguments with hindsight: was policy successful in delivering the objective or was it instead ‘inattentive’, as some critics at the time claimed? We argue that the euro area economy faced a series of inflationary supply shocks and the policy framework was helpful in those conditions. The perceived asymmetry of the inflation objective—with a hard ‘ceiling’ at 2%—allowed automatic adjustments in underlying conditions, including inflation expectations, to do a large part of the stabilization job. However, we show that this self-stabilizing mechanism also admits a second regime: if the economy enters a situation where negative demand shocks dominate, the ‘ceiling’ ceases to bind and act as a stabilizer, leading inflation to drift downwards. We contend that the ECB may have entered such a regime after the financial crisis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信