Mathangi Krishnamurthy,《1-800-WORLDS:印度呼叫中心经济的形成

K. Coelho
{"title":"Mathangi Krishnamurthy,《1-800-WORLDS:印度呼叫中心经济的形成","authors":"K. Coelho","doi":"10.1177/0972266120972350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"segregation based on caste, she does not enlarge on the agency of caste networks, which are not limited to only preserving and protecting upper caste–self but also broadening the scope of creating an organic solidarity, which encourages and promotes caste differentiation and nepotism. The book discusses the extent of class inequalities but inadequately contemplates on the cultural and ideological lenses of caste used to justify notions of merit. Thus, this book is useful in understanding the dimension of caste within the framework of sociology of education but fails to capture the different worldviews that enter spaces like IITs, especially today. A growing number of students come from Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes, and their bringing new forms of articulations of caste subjectivities, be it Ambedkar Periyar Study Circle or Chinta Bar in IIT Madras, needs to be examined. The book leaves scope for addressing these questions: Are these organisations truly and only non-Brahmin collectives? How are the notions of merit changing in spaces like IIT Madras from an up-down approach of investigating caste articulations? How does an institute like IIT Madras aim to achieve a secular image while, in its various functions, apparently downplaying reservation and multiculturalism as an equalising process? The book’s engagement with the reservation policy and the counter responses from upper castes give valuable insights in scrutinising the claims of merit and competence but fails to address the issues of self-respect and subaltern agency in shaping subjectivities of caste. The book’s highlight remains in tracing the claims of meritocracy by upper castes, from colonial to contemporary times, in the contexts of engineering education and jobs: It explains the transformation of markers of caste and class superiority and morality.","PeriodicalId":202404,"journal":{"name":"Review of Development and Change","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mathangi Krishnamurthy, 1-800-WORLDS: The Making of the Indian Call Centre Economy\",\"authors\":\"K. Coelho\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0972266120972350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"segregation based on caste, she does not enlarge on the agency of caste networks, which are not limited to only preserving and protecting upper caste–self but also broadening the scope of creating an organic solidarity, which encourages and promotes caste differentiation and nepotism. The book discusses the extent of class inequalities but inadequately contemplates on the cultural and ideological lenses of caste used to justify notions of merit. Thus, this book is useful in understanding the dimension of caste within the framework of sociology of education but fails to capture the different worldviews that enter spaces like IITs, especially today. A growing number of students come from Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes, and their bringing new forms of articulations of caste subjectivities, be it Ambedkar Periyar Study Circle or Chinta Bar in IIT Madras, needs to be examined. The book leaves scope for addressing these questions: Are these organisations truly and only non-Brahmin collectives? How are the notions of merit changing in spaces like IIT Madras from an up-down approach of investigating caste articulations? How does an institute like IIT Madras aim to achieve a secular image while, in its various functions, apparently downplaying reservation and multiculturalism as an equalising process? The book’s engagement with the reservation policy and the counter responses from upper castes give valuable insights in scrutinising the claims of merit and competence but fails to address the issues of self-respect and subaltern agency in shaping subjectivities of caste. The book’s highlight remains in tracing the claims of meritocracy by upper castes, from colonial to contemporary times, in the contexts of engineering education and jobs: It explains the transformation of markers of caste and class superiority and morality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Development and Change\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Development and Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0972266120972350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Development and Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0972266120972350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于种姓的隔离,她没有扩大种姓网络的作用,种姓网络不仅限于保存和保护上层种姓自我,还扩大了创造有机团结的范围,这鼓励和促进了种姓分化和裙带关系。这本书讨论了阶级不平等的程度,但没有充分考虑种姓的文化和意识形态镜头,用来证明功绩的概念。因此,这本书有助于理解教育社会学框架内的种姓维度,但未能捕捉到进入印度理工学院等空间的不同世界观,尤其是在今天。越来越多的学生来自排名表种姓、排名表部落和其他落后阶级,他们带来的新形式的种姓主体性,无论是安贝德卡Periyar学习圈还是印度理工学院马德拉斯的Chinta酒吧,都需要加以审查。这本书为解决这些问题留下了空间:这些组织真的只是非婆罗门的集体吗?在印度理工学院马德拉斯这样的地方,从自上而下的调查种姓关系的方法来看,功绩的概念是如何变化的?像印度理工学院马德拉斯学院这样的机构,是如何在其各种功能中,明显淡化保留主义和多元文化主义,并将其作为一个平等的过程,以实现世俗形象的?这本书对预留制政策和上层种姓的反回应的参与,为审视功绩和能力的主张提供了有价值的见解,但未能解决自尊和次等机构在塑造种姓主体性方面的问题。这本书的亮点在于追溯了从殖民时代到当代,在工程教育和就业的背景下,上层种姓对精英统治的主张:它解释了种姓、阶级优越感和道德标志的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mathangi Krishnamurthy, 1-800-WORLDS: The Making of the Indian Call Centre Economy
segregation based on caste, she does not enlarge on the agency of caste networks, which are not limited to only preserving and protecting upper caste–self but also broadening the scope of creating an organic solidarity, which encourages and promotes caste differentiation and nepotism. The book discusses the extent of class inequalities but inadequately contemplates on the cultural and ideological lenses of caste used to justify notions of merit. Thus, this book is useful in understanding the dimension of caste within the framework of sociology of education but fails to capture the different worldviews that enter spaces like IITs, especially today. A growing number of students come from Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes, and their bringing new forms of articulations of caste subjectivities, be it Ambedkar Periyar Study Circle or Chinta Bar in IIT Madras, needs to be examined. The book leaves scope for addressing these questions: Are these organisations truly and only non-Brahmin collectives? How are the notions of merit changing in spaces like IIT Madras from an up-down approach of investigating caste articulations? How does an institute like IIT Madras aim to achieve a secular image while, in its various functions, apparently downplaying reservation and multiculturalism as an equalising process? The book’s engagement with the reservation policy and the counter responses from upper castes give valuable insights in scrutinising the claims of merit and competence but fails to address the issues of self-respect and subaltern agency in shaping subjectivities of caste. The book’s highlight remains in tracing the claims of meritocracy by upper castes, from colonial to contemporary times, in the contexts of engineering education and jobs: It explains the transformation of markers of caste and class superiority and morality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信