重新设计乐观方法:提高性能和适用性

U. Prädel, G. Schlageter, R. Unland
{"title":"重新设计乐观方法:提高性能和适用性","authors":"U. Prädel, G. Schlageter, R. Unland","doi":"10.1109/ICDE.1986.7266253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The original approach of optimistic concurrency control /2/ has some serious weaknesses with respect to validation, long transactions and starvation. This paper first discusses design alternatives which avoid these disadvantages. Essential improvements can be reached by a new validation scheme which is called snapshot validation. The paper then discusses a validation scheme which especially supports read transactions, so that the number of backups decreases substantially. Finally a very simple solution for the starvation problem is presented. The proposal is perfectly consistent with the underlying optimistic approach.","PeriodicalId":415748,"journal":{"name":"1986 IEEE Second International Conference on Data Engineering","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redesign of optimistic methods: Improving performance and applicability\",\"authors\":\"U. Prädel, G. Schlageter, R. Unland\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDE.1986.7266253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The original approach of optimistic concurrency control /2/ has some serious weaknesses with respect to validation, long transactions and starvation. This paper first discusses design alternatives which avoid these disadvantages. Essential improvements can be reached by a new validation scheme which is called snapshot validation. The paper then discusses a validation scheme which especially supports read transactions, so that the number of backups decreases substantially. Finally a very simple solution for the starvation problem is presented. The proposal is perfectly consistent with the underlying optimistic approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1986 IEEE Second International Conference on Data Engineering\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1986 IEEE Second International Conference on Data Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.1986.7266253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1986 IEEE Second International Conference on Data Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.1986.7266253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

乐观并发控制的原始方法在验证、长事务和饥饿方面有一些严重的弱点。本文首先讨论了避免这些缺点的设计方案。基本的改进可以通过一种称为快照验证的新验证方案来实现。然后讨论了一种特别支持读事务的验证方案,从而大大减少了备份的数量。最后,提出了一个非常简单的解决饥饿问题的方法。这项提议与潜在的乐观态度完全一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Redesign of optimistic methods: Improving performance and applicability
The original approach of optimistic concurrency control /2/ has some serious weaknesses with respect to validation, long transactions and starvation. This paper first discusses design alternatives which avoid these disadvantages. Essential improvements can be reached by a new validation scheme which is called snapshot validation. The paper then discusses a validation scheme which especially supports read transactions, so that the number of backups decreases substantially. Finally a very simple solution for the starvation problem is presented. The proposal is perfectly consistent with the underlying optimistic approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信