A new way to be a forensic electrical expert

The paper aims to propose a first possible solution to solve the known contrast between the certain logic required by the judicial outcome of proceedings and the uncertain logic of the engineering evaluation. In the accident-cases that require a risk assessment, this discussion suggests to adopting the subdivision of accident-related trials into two different levels, a technical “engineering” level, performed on the quantitative analysis of the accident causes, followed by a judicial level. A technical level might better support the formulation of the verdict by providing a more exhaustive analysis of the accident causation and parties' responsibilities, getting over the “ancillary” position of the technical consultants in the depositions. It might also provide criteria to improve the safety of persons for accident prevention in the workplaces and in the operation of electrical installations. In some countries, the institutions establish and define the specific area of expertise of the forensic engineer and promote the advancement of the forensic science through conferences and publications. These institutions could support the suggested approach, considered that the safety is a basic human right and its increase is an ethical and civil duty.