{"title":"汽车置换与政府补贴:对CARS计划的分析","authors":"Junyan Guan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3873076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subsidy programs are widely used by governments to stimulate durable goods sectors. This paper investigates the impact of government subsidy on consumers' automobile replacement decisions in the context of the U.S. Car Allowance and Rebate System program in 2009. I develop and estimate a dynamic discrete-choice model of automobile replacement, and conduct counterfactual analysis to evaluate the effects of government subsidies. Results show that 65% of the households would replace their vehicles even without the subsidy, and the reductions in gasoline consumption and carbon emission are limited. To highlight the impact of subsidy design, I show that limiting the subsidy to low-income consumers would generate 85% of the sales with half amount of total government spending. These findings emphasize the importance of balancing policy stimulus with government spending and targeting consumers more efficiently in the design of subsidy programs.","PeriodicalId":430354,"journal":{"name":"IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets eJournal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automobile Replacement and Government Subsidy: An Analysis of the CARS Program\",\"authors\":\"Junyan Guan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3873076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Subsidy programs are widely used by governments to stimulate durable goods sectors. This paper investigates the impact of government subsidy on consumers' automobile replacement decisions in the context of the U.S. Car Allowance and Rebate System program in 2009. I develop and estimate a dynamic discrete-choice model of automobile replacement, and conduct counterfactual analysis to evaluate the effects of government subsidies. Results show that 65% of the households would replace their vehicles even without the subsidy, and the reductions in gasoline consumption and carbon emission are limited. To highlight the impact of subsidy design, I show that limiting the subsidy to low-income consumers would generate 85% of the sales with half amount of total government spending. These findings emphasize the importance of balancing policy stimulus with government spending and targeting consumers more efficiently in the design of subsidy programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets eJournal\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3873076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3873076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Automobile Replacement and Government Subsidy: An Analysis of the CARS Program
Subsidy programs are widely used by governments to stimulate durable goods sectors. This paper investigates the impact of government subsidy on consumers' automobile replacement decisions in the context of the U.S. Car Allowance and Rebate System program in 2009. I develop and estimate a dynamic discrete-choice model of automobile replacement, and conduct counterfactual analysis to evaluate the effects of government subsidies. Results show that 65% of the households would replace their vehicles even without the subsidy, and the reductions in gasoline consumption and carbon emission are limited. To highlight the impact of subsidy design, I show that limiting the subsidy to low-income consumers would generate 85% of the sales with half amount of total government spending. These findings emphasize the importance of balancing policy stimulus with government spending and targeting consumers more efficiently in the design of subsidy programs.