后工业花园

Alex Schafran
{"title":"后工业花园","authors":"Alex Schafran","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv65svzf.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines key moments and symbolic struggles in the production of the postindustrial garden in East County. The industrial garden was “a coordinated middle landscape that joined economic progress and social stability.” However, it was a model underscored by deep racism, a paternalist political structure, economic inefficiency, and environmental destruction. East County reflected the same basic idea as the industrial garden, but with different people in different places and a very different underlying political economy. When it came time for people of color to suburbanize en masse, something they did alongside many working- and middle-class whites, the red carpet laid out by the postwar U.S. government had been worn out and not replaced. Instead of fixing suburbanization so that communities of color could enjoy what they had been excluded from, newly suburbanized communities were increasingly abandoned to their own devices.","PeriodicalId":115844,"journal":{"name":"The Road to Resegregation","volume":"308 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Postindustrial Garden\",\"authors\":\"Alex Schafran\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv65svzf.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter examines key moments and symbolic struggles in the production of the postindustrial garden in East County. The industrial garden was “a coordinated middle landscape that joined economic progress and social stability.” However, it was a model underscored by deep racism, a paternalist political structure, economic inefficiency, and environmental destruction. East County reflected the same basic idea as the industrial garden, but with different people in different places and a very different underlying political economy. When it came time for people of color to suburbanize en masse, something they did alongside many working- and middle-class whites, the red carpet laid out by the postwar U.S. government had been worn out and not replaced. Instead of fixing suburbanization so that communities of color could enjoy what they had been excluded from, newly suburbanized communities were increasingly abandoned to their own devices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Road to Resegregation\",\"volume\":\"308 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Road to Resegregation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65svzf.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Road to Resegregation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65svzf.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章考察了东县后工业花园生产中的关键时刻和象征性斗争。工业园区是“经济发展与社会稳定相协调的中间景观”。然而,这种模式被深刻的种族主义、家长式的政治结构、经济效率低下和环境破坏所强调。东县反映了与工业园区相同的基本理念,但不同地方的人不同,潜在的政治经济也非常不同。当有色人种与许多工薪阶层和中产阶级白人一起大规模向郊区迁移时,战后美国政府铺设的红地毯已经破旧不堪,再也没有被取代。新的郊区化社区并没有解决郊区化问题,使有色人种社区能够享受到他们被排除在外的东西,而是越来越多地被遗弃在自己的设备上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Postindustrial Garden
This chapter examines key moments and symbolic struggles in the production of the postindustrial garden in East County. The industrial garden was “a coordinated middle landscape that joined economic progress and social stability.” However, it was a model underscored by deep racism, a paternalist political structure, economic inefficiency, and environmental destruction. East County reflected the same basic idea as the industrial garden, but with different people in different places and a very different underlying political economy. When it came time for people of color to suburbanize en masse, something they did alongside many working- and middle-class whites, the red carpet laid out by the postwar U.S. government had been worn out and not replaced. Instead of fixing suburbanization so that communities of color could enjoy what they had been excluded from, newly suburbanized communities were increasingly abandoned to their own devices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信