小型固定翼无人机风梯度利用制导与控制方法定性分析

Leopoldo Rodríguez, J. A. Cobano, A. Ollero
{"title":"小型固定翼无人机风梯度利用制导与控制方法定性分析","authors":"Leopoldo Rodríguez, J. A. Cobano, A. Ollero","doi":"10.1109/RED-UAS.2017.8101651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, different Guidance and Control (GC) methods for trajectory tracking are analyzed. This effort considers the ongoing research effort regarding wind features characterization and trajectory generation. The investigation of GC methods is contextualized for long duration missions of small Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS). These are often hampered by the platform characteristics with cost and weight stringent restrictions. Therefore, innovative ways of increasing flight duration are necessary to fulfill the safety and reliability requirements for such missions fulfilling the cost and weight constraints. Atmospheric Energy Harvesting has been studied as an alternative for flight duration enhancement. The guidance and control strategies have been focused in the dynamic soaring case, in which the trajectories require precise tracking for energy gain. This gain depends on the tracking ability of the autopilot which motivates this analysis. As a conclusion to this analysis, two methodologies are chosen as candidates for GC, one based on pure differential geometry techniques to formulate simple error equations, and the other that uses adaptive control strategies based on vector field theory to formulate error equations and a Lyapunov function ensuring asymptotic stability with complex curve shapes and wind disturbances.","PeriodicalId":299104,"journal":{"name":"2017 Workshop on Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (RED-UAS)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative analysis of guidance and control methods for wind gradients exploitation with small fixed wing UAS\",\"authors\":\"Leopoldo Rodríguez, J. A. Cobano, A. Ollero\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RED-UAS.2017.8101651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, different Guidance and Control (GC) methods for trajectory tracking are analyzed. This effort considers the ongoing research effort regarding wind features characterization and trajectory generation. The investigation of GC methods is contextualized for long duration missions of small Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS). These are often hampered by the platform characteristics with cost and weight stringent restrictions. Therefore, innovative ways of increasing flight duration are necessary to fulfill the safety and reliability requirements for such missions fulfilling the cost and weight constraints. Atmospheric Energy Harvesting has been studied as an alternative for flight duration enhancement. The guidance and control strategies have been focused in the dynamic soaring case, in which the trajectories require precise tracking for energy gain. This gain depends on the tracking ability of the autopilot which motivates this analysis. As a conclusion to this analysis, two methodologies are chosen as candidates for GC, one based on pure differential geometry techniques to formulate simple error equations, and the other that uses adaptive control strategies based on vector field theory to formulate error equations and a Lyapunov function ensuring asymptotic stability with complex curve shapes and wind disturbances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Workshop on Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (RED-UAS)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Workshop on Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (RED-UAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RED-UAS.2017.8101651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Workshop on Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (RED-UAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RED-UAS.2017.8101651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了不同制导控制方法在弹道跟踪中的应用。这项工作考虑了正在进行的关于风特征表征和轨迹生成的研究工作。针对小型无人机系统(UAS)的长时程任务,研究了GC方法。这些通常受到成本和重量严格限制的平台特性的阻碍。因此,增加飞行时间的创新方法是必要的,以满足满足成本和重量限制的此类任务的安全性和可靠性要求。大气能量收集作为提高飞行时间的一种替代方法已被研究。制导和控制策略主要集中在动态飙升情况下,在这种情况下,轨迹需要精确跟踪以获得能量增益。这一增益取决于自动驾驶仪的跟踪能力,而自动驾驶仪正是这一分析的动机。作为分析的结论,本文选择了两种方法作为GC的候选方法,一种是基于纯微分几何技术来制定简单的误差方程,另一种是使用基于矢量场理论的自适应控制策略来制定误差方程和Lyapunov函数,以确保复杂曲线形状和风干扰的渐近稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qualitative analysis of guidance and control methods for wind gradients exploitation with small fixed wing UAS
In this paper, different Guidance and Control (GC) methods for trajectory tracking are analyzed. This effort considers the ongoing research effort regarding wind features characterization and trajectory generation. The investigation of GC methods is contextualized for long duration missions of small Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS). These are often hampered by the platform characteristics with cost and weight stringent restrictions. Therefore, innovative ways of increasing flight duration are necessary to fulfill the safety and reliability requirements for such missions fulfilling the cost and weight constraints. Atmospheric Energy Harvesting has been studied as an alternative for flight duration enhancement. The guidance and control strategies have been focused in the dynamic soaring case, in which the trajectories require precise tracking for energy gain. This gain depends on the tracking ability of the autopilot which motivates this analysis. As a conclusion to this analysis, two methodologies are chosen as candidates for GC, one based on pure differential geometry techniques to formulate simple error equations, and the other that uses adaptive control strategies based on vector field theory to formulate error equations and a Lyapunov function ensuring asymptotic stability with complex curve shapes and wind disturbances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信