新冠肺炎疫情高峰期癌症患者对治疗的情绪分析

Bilal Ahmad, Sun Jun
{"title":"新冠肺炎疫情高峰期癌症患者对治疗的情绪分析","authors":"Bilal Ahmad, Sun Jun","doi":"10.1109/ICCIS54243.2021.9676393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media has become a valuable tool for users to express their opinion and for researchers to analyze public sentiment more efficiently. People respond much quickly towards any issue on social than any other traditional platform. Observing the patient's opinion on social media about the hospital medical facilities is a new trend that several hospitals are adopting recently in the modern world to improve their heal care facilities. After the pandemic of SARS-CoV-2, it has influenced the health care practices of all the world. Initial investigations indicate that patients with comorbidities are more fragile to this SARS-CoV-2 infection. Medical experts suggested postponing the routine treatment of cancer patients. However, few meta-analyses suggested evidence are not sufficient to hold the claim of the frailty of cancer patients to COVID-19. They were not in favor of shelving the scheduled treatments. On the other hand, some medical experts favored postponing cancer patients' scheduled treatments like chemotherapy, which could be a dangerous decision for cancer patients. We conducted the sentiment analysis of the patients with various comorbidities (diseases like diabetes, obesity, and cancer in which patient has to visit the hospital more often) to understand their point of view whether they were satisfied during the pandemic with their treatment or not? How Covid-19 affected their scheduled appointments. To serve the purpose, we gathered more than 150000 relevant tweets from Twitter (Jan 2020 to April 2020) to analyze the sentiment of cancer patients around the world. Our findings demonstrate a surge in the argument about cancer and its treatment after the outbreak of COVID-19. Most of the tweets are reasonable (52.6%) compared to negative ones (24.3%). We developed polarity and subjectivity distribution to better recognize the positivity/negativity in the sentiment. The results reveal that the polarity range of positive tweets is within the range of 0 to 0.5. That means the tendency in the tweets is not negative (it is above zero) nor so much positive too. It is statistical evidence supporting how natural language processing (NLP) can be used to better understand the patient's behavior in real-time. It may facilitate the medical professionals to make better decisions to organize the routine management of cancer patients.","PeriodicalId":165673,"journal":{"name":"2021 4th International Conference on Computing & Information Sciences (ICCIS)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sentiment Analysis of Cancer Patients About Their Treatment During the Peak Time of Pandemic COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Bilal Ahmad, Sun Jun\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCIS54243.2021.9676393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social media has become a valuable tool for users to express their opinion and for researchers to analyze public sentiment more efficiently. People respond much quickly towards any issue on social than any other traditional platform. Observing the patient's opinion on social media about the hospital medical facilities is a new trend that several hospitals are adopting recently in the modern world to improve their heal care facilities. After the pandemic of SARS-CoV-2, it has influenced the health care practices of all the world. Initial investigations indicate that patients with comorbidities are more fragile to this SARS-CoV-2 infection. Medical experts suggested postponing the routine treatment of cancer patients. However, few meta-analyses suggested evidence are not sufficient to hold the claim of the frailty of cancer patients to COVID-19. They were not in favor of shelving the scheduled treatments. On the other hand, some medical experts favored postponing cancer patients' scheduled treatments like chemotherapy, which could be a dangerous decision for cancer patients. We conducted the sentiment analysis of the patients with various comorbidities (diseases like diabetes, obesity, and cancer in which patient has to visit the hospital more often) to understand their point of view whether they were satisfied during the pandemic with their treatment or not? How Covid-19 affected their scheduled appointments. To serve the purpose, we gathered more than 150000 relevant tweets from Twitter (Jan 2020 to April 2020) to analyze the sentiment of cancer patients around the world. Our findings demonstrate a surge in the argument about cancer and its treatment after the outbreak of COVID-19. Most of the tweets are reasonable (52.6%) compared to negative ones (24.3%). We developed polarity and subjectivity distribution to better recognize the positivity/negativity in the sentiment. The results reveal that the polarity range of positive tweets is within the range of 0 to 0.5. That means the tendency in the tweets is not negative (it is above zero) nor so much positive too. It is statistical evidence supporting how natural language processing (NLP) can be used to better understand the patient's behavior in real-time. It may facilitate the medical professionals to make better decisions to organize the routine management of cancer patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 4th International Conference on Computing & Information Sciences (ICCIS)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 4th International Conference on Computing & Information Sciences (ICCIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIS54243.2021.9676393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 4th International Conference on Computing & Information Sciences (ICCIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIS54243.2021.9676393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社交媒体已经成为用户表达意见和研究人员更有效地分析公众情绪的宝贵工具。在社交平台上,人们对任何问题的反应都比其他传统平台快得多。观察病人在社交媒体上对医院医疗设施的看法是一种新趋势,最近在现代世界,一些医院正在采用这种新趋势来改善他们的医疗设施。在SARS-CoV-2大流行之后,它影响了全世界的卫生保健做法。初步调查表明,有合并症的患者对这种SARS-CoV-2感染更脆弱。医学专家建议推迟癌症患者的常规治疗。然而,很少有荟萃分析表明,证据不足以支持癌症患者易受COVID-19感染的说法。他们不赞成搁置预定的治疗。另一方面,一些医学专家倾向于推迟癌症患者的化疗等预定治疗,这对癌症患者来说可能是一个危险的决定。我们对患有各种合并症的患者(如糖尿病、肥胖和癌症等患者必须更频繁地去医院)进行了情绪分析,以了解他们的观点,他们是否对大流行期间的治疗感到满意?Covid-19如何影响他们的预约。为此,我们从Twitter上收集了超过15万条相关推文(2020年1月至2020年4月)来分析全球癌症患者的情绪。我们的研究结果表明,在COVID-19爆发后,关于癌症及其治疗的争论激增。大多数推文是合理的(52.6%),而负面推文(24.3%)。我们开发极性和主观性分布,以更好地识别情绪中的积极/消极。结果表明,积极推文的极性范围在0 ~ 0.5之间。这意味着推特上的趋势既不是消极的(高于零),也不是那么积极。这是统计证据支持如何使用自然语言处理(NLP)来更好地实时理解患者的行为。组织对肿瘤患者的日常管理,有助于医务人员做出更好的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sentiment Analysis of Cancer Patients About Their Treatment During the Peak Time of Pandemic COVID-19
Social media has become a valuable tool for users to express their opinion and for researchers to analyze public sentiment more efficiently. People respond much quickly towards any issue on social than any other traditional platform. Observing the patient's opinion on social media about the hospital medical facilities is a new trend that several hospitals are adopting recently in the modern world to improve their heal care facilities. After the pandemic of SARS-CoV-2, it has influenced the health care practices of all the world. Initial investigations indicate that patients with comorbidities are more fragile to this SARS-CoV-2 infection. Medical experts suggested postponing the routine treatment of cancer patients. However, few meta-analyses suggested evidence are not sufficient to hold the claim of the frailty of cancer patients to COVID-19. They were not in favor of shelving the scheduled treatments. On the other hand, some medical experts favored postponing cancer patients' scheduled treatments like chemotherapy, which could be a dangerous decision for cancer patients. We conducted the sentiment analysis of the patients with various comorbidities (diseases like diabetes, obesity, and cancer in which patient has to visit the hospital more often) to understand their point of view whether they were satisfied during the pandemic with their treatment or not? How Covid-19 affected their scheduled appointments. To serve the purpose, we gathered more than 150000 relevant tweets from Twitter (Jan 2020 to April 2020) to analyze the sentiment of cancer patients around the world. Our findings demonstrate a surge in the argument about cancer and its treatment after the outbreak of COVID-19. Most of the tweets are reasonable (52.6%) compared to negative ones (24.3%). We developed polarity and subjectivity distribution to better recognize the positivity/negativity in the sentiment. The results reveal that the polarity range of positive tweets is within the range of 0 to 0.5. That means the tendency in the tweets is not negative (it is above zero) nor so much positive too. It is statistical evidence supporting how natural language processing (NLP) can be used to better understand the patient's behavior in real-time. It may facilitate the medical professionals to make better decisions to organize the routine management of cancer patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信