故事中的塔克·阿特拉韦:基础设施规划和人类住区建设

A. Krüger
{"title":"故事中的塔克·阿特拉韦:基础设施规划和人类住区建设","authors":"A. Krüger","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2022.2117495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract What is noticeable about contemporary housing developments in Germany, whether they occur on city fringes or inner-city brownfields (for example, harbour or station areas)? It is not only the return of large-scale housing, but also the leitmotiv that shapes new towns and urban districts. Holistic approaches and integrated planning are experiencing a renaissance. In order to illustrate whether and how past epochs are linked to today’s leitmotivs, a review has been undertaken into how social infrastructure, in particular, has been planned in recent decades. The aim is not to compare the urban design of housing from the Late Modern period with today, but to focus on non-housing in housing developments. What role does/did infrastructural planning play? How is/was infrastructural planning woven into integrated approaches and urban design leitmotivs? How are/were planners striving for urbanity in the new housing developments? Back then and today, these new housing areas are/were not meant to be “dormitory towns”, but urbanised districts of a lively city. Do planners actively learn from the past, not only from Late Modern housing but also from the Careful Urban Renewal of the past three decades, as many large-scale settlements were and are the backdrop to renewal? This article aims to connect evidence about the past with current planning approaches. It links recent infrastructural demands (for example, regarding education and mobility) with past and present planning approaches and discusses the impact of societal reorientation towards a common good for the urban leitmotivs of today’s large-scale housing developments. English title: Takeaways from planning history: Infrastructure planning and housing development construction","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Take-Aways aus der Planungsgeschichte: Infrastrukturplanung und Siedlungsbau\",\"authors\":\"A. Krüger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02513625.2022.2117495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract What is noticeable about contemporary housing developments in Germany, whether they occur on city fringes or inner-city brownfields (for example, harbour or station areas)? It is not only the return of large-scale housing, but also the leitmotiv that shapes new towns and urban districts. Holistic approaches and integrated planning are experiencing a renaissance. In order to illustrate whether and how past epochs are linked to today’s leitmotivs, a review has been undertaken into how social infrastructure, in particular, has been planned in recent decades. The aim is not to compare the urban design of housing from the Late Modern period with today, but to focus on non-housing in housing developments. What role does/did infrastructural planning play? How is/was infrastructural planning woven into integrated approaches and urban design leitmotivs? How are/were planners striving for urbanity in the new housing developments? Back then and today, these new housing areas are/were not meant to be “dormitory towns”, but urbanised districts of a lively city. Do planners actively learn from the past, not only from Late Modern housing but also from the Careful Urban Renewal of the past three decades, as many large-scale settlements were and are the backdrop to renewal? This article aims to connect evidence about the past with current planning approaches. It links recent infrastructural demands (for example, regarding education and mobility) with past and present planning approaches and discusses the impact of societal reorientation towards a common good for the urban leitmotivs of today’s large-scale housing developments. English title: Takeaways from planning history: Infrastructure planning and housing development construction\",\"PeriodicalId\":379677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"disP - The Planning Review\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"disP - The Planning Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2022.2117495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"disP - The Planning Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2022.2117495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在德国,无论是在城市边缘还是在市中心的棕色地带(例如,港口或车站区),当代住房开发有什么值得注意的?这不仅是大规模住房的回归,也是塑造新城镇和城区的动力。整体方法和综合规划正在复兴。为了说明过去的时代是否以及如何与今天的主要动机联系在一起,对近几十年来特别是社会基础设施是如何规划的进行了审查。目的不是比较近代晚期和今天的城市住宅设计,而是关注住宅开发中的非住宅。基础设施规划扮演了什么角色?基础设施规划是如何与综合方法和城市设计动机相结合的?规划者是如何在新住宅发展中努力实现都市化的?在当时和今天,这些新住宅区并不是“宿舍区”,而是一个充满活力的城市的城市化地区。规划者是否积极地从过去学习,不仅从现代晚期的住房中学习,而且从过去三十年的“谨慎的城市更新”中学习,因为许多大规模的定居点过去和现在都是更新的背景?本文旨在将过去的证据与当前的规划方法联系起来。它将最近的基础设施需求(例如,关于教育和流动性)与过去和现在的规划方法联系起来,并讨论了社会重新定位对当今大规模住房开发的城市发展动机的共同利益的影响。英文标题:规划历史要点:基础设施规划和住房开发建设
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Take-Aways aus der Planungsgeschichte: Infrastrukturplanung und Siedlungsbau
Abstract What is noticeable about contemporary housing developments in Germany, whether they occur on city fringes or inner-city brownfields (for example, harbour or station areas)? It is not only the return of large-scale housing, but also the leitmotiv that shapes new towns and urban districts. Holistic approaches and integrated planning are experiencing a renaissance. In order to illustrate whether and how past epochs are linked to today’s leitmotivs, a review has been undertaken into how social infrastructure, in particular, has been planned in recent decades. The aim is not to compare the urban design of housing from the Late Modern period with today, but to focus on non-housing in housing developments. What role does/did infrastructural planning play? How is/was infrastructural planning woven into integrated approaches and urban design leitmotivs? How are/were planners striving for urbanity in the new housing developments? Back then and today, these new housing areas are/were not meant to be “dormitory towns”, but urbanised districts of a lively city. Do planners actively learn from the past, not only from Late Modern housing but also from the Careful Urban Renewal of the past three decades, as many large-scale settlements were and are the backdrop to renewal? This article aims to connect evidence about the past with current planning approaches. It links recent infrastructural demands (for example, regarding education and mobility) with past and present planning approaches and discusses the impact of societal reorientation towards a common good for the urban leitmotivs of today’s large-scale housing developments. English title: Takeaways from planning history: Infrastructure planning and housing development construction
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信