膀胱阴道瘘:现代诊断和治疗观念。

D. A. Suchkov, R. A. Shakhaliev, D. Shkarupa, A. Shkarupa, N. Kubin, N. Gadzhiev, A. S. Shulgin
{"title":"膀胱阴道瘘:现代诊断和治疗观念。","authors":"D. A. Suchkov, R. A. Shakhaliev, D. Shkarupa, A. Shkarupa, N. Kubin, N. Gadzhiev, A. S. Shulgin","doi":"10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-2-148-161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) is a pathological communication between the urinary bladder and the vagina. The lack of common approaches to the treatment choice, its timing and postoperative management of patients makes this disorder one of the challenges of modern urogynecology. Materials and methods. Relevant publications were searched using the PubMed database, the Google Scholar search system, and the scientific electronic library eLibrary.ru. Results. VVF is the most common form of urogenital fistulas. In developed countries, the formation of VVF mainly are the result of surgical trauma or radiation therapy, but in developing ones the majority of VVF have an obstetric etiology. There are different classifications of VVF; however, there is no overall accepted one that is suitable for predicting treatment efficacy and long-term outcomes regardless of etiology of VVF. Treatment of VVF with long-term bladder drainage should be performed only for small, benign and unformed VVF. Surgical closure of VVF is the primary method of treatment. Surgery can be performed using abdominal and vaginal access. Regardless of the access, a positive result (closure of the fistula) on average is achieved in 90,8% of cases. The treatment of post-radiation fistulas is more challenged and associated with a high failure rate. Conclusion. Despite of the variety of VVF treatment options, unfortunately, there is no the perfect one yet due to the variability of VVF ethiology, the lack of unified curative approaches and the shortage of studies comparing different therapies.","PeriodicalId":123040,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Сlinical Urology","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vesico-vaginal fistulas: modern concepts of diagnosis and treatment.\",\"authors\":\"D. A. Suchkov, R. A. Shakhaliev, D. Shkarupa, A. Shkarupa, N. Kubin, N. Gadzhiev, A. S. Shulgin\",\"doi\":\"10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-2-148-161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) is a pathological communication between the urinary bladder and the vagina. The lack of common approaches to the treatment choice, its timing and postoperative management of patients makes this disorder one of the challenges of modern urogynecology. Materials and methods. Relevant publications were searched using the PubMed database, the Google Scholar search system, and the scientific electronic library eLibrary.ru. Results. VVF is the most common form of urogenital fistulas. In developed countries, the formation of VVF mainly are the result of surgical trauma or radiation therapy, but in developing ones the majority of VVF have an obstetric etiology. There are different classifications of VVF; however, there is no overall accepted one that is suitable for predicting treatment efficacy and long-term outcomes regardless of etiology of VVF. Treatment of VVF with long-term bladder drainage should be performed only for small, benign and unformed VVF. Surgical closure of VVF is the primary method of treatment. Surgery can be performed using abdominal and vaginal access. Regardless of the access, a positive result (closure of the fistula) on average is achieved in 90,8% of cases. The treatment of post-radiation fistulas is more challenged and associated with a high failure rate. Conclusion. Despite of the variety of VVF treatment options, unfortunately, there is no the perfect one yet due to the variability of VVF ethiology, the lack of unified curative approaches and the shortage of studies comparing different therapies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental and Сlinical Urology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental and Сlinical Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-2-148-161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Сlinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-2-148-161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。膀胱阴道瘘(VVF)是膀胱和阴道之间的病理性通信。缺乏共同的治疗方法的选择,其时机和患者的术后管理,使这种疾病的挑战之一,现代泌尿妇科。材料和方法。相关出版物使用PubMed数据库、Google Scholar搜索系统和科学电子图书馆elibrlibrary .ru进行检索。结果。VVF是泌尿生殖道瘘管最常见的形式。在发达国家,VVF的形成主要是手术创伤或放射治疗的结果,但在发展中国家,大多数VVF有产科病因。变频调速有不同的分类;然而,无论病因如何,目前还没有一个被普遍接受的预测VVF治疗效果和长期结果的方法。只有对小的、良性的和未形成的VVF进行长期膀胱引流治疗。手术封闭VVF是治疗的主要方法。手术可以通过腹部和阴道通道进行。无论采用何种途径,平均908%的病例可获得阳性结果(瘘管闭合)。放疗后瘘管的治疗更具挑战性,且失败率高。结论。尽管有各种各样的VVF治疗方案,但不幸的是,由于VVF伦理学的可变性,缺乏统一的治疗方法以及缺乏比较不同治疗方法的研究,目前还没有一个完美的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vesico-vaginal fistulas: modern concepts of diagnosis and treatment.
Introduction. Vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) is a pathological communication between the urinary bladder and the vagina. The lack of common approaches to the treatment choice, its timing and postoperative management of patients makes this disorder one of the challenges of modern urogynecology. Materials and methods. Relevant publications were searched using the PubMed database, the Google Scholar search system, and the scientific electronic library eLibrary.ru. Results. VVF is the most common form of urogenital fistulas. In developed countries, the formation of VVF mainly are the result of surgical trauma or radiation therapy, but in developing ones the majority of VVF have an obstetric etiology. There are different classifications of VVF; however, there is no overall accepted one that is suitable for predicting treatment efficacy and long-term outcomes regardless of etiology of VVF. Treatment of VVF with long-term bladder drainage should be performed only for small, benign and unformed VVF. Surgical closure of VVF is the primary method of treatment. Surgery can be performed using abdominal and vaginal access. Regardless of the access, a positive result (closure of the fistula) on average is achieved in 90,8% of cases. The treatment of post-radiation fistulas is more challenged and associated with a high failure rate. Conclusion. Despite of the variety of VVF treatment options, unfortunately, there is no the perfect one yet due to the variability of VVF ethiology, the lack of unified curative approaches and the shortage of studies comparing different therapies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信