为什么美国上市公司不使用股东协议:一个寻求解释的难题

Marco Ventoruzzo
{"title":"为什么美国上市公司不使用股东协议:一个寻求解释的难题","authors":"Marco Ventoruzzo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2246005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This short essay, prepared as the text of a talk for a conference on shareholders’ agreements, examines what I consider one of the most puzzling and overlooked issues of US corporate law and securities regulation. The issue is why agreements among shareholders are not often used as control enhancing devices among American listed corporations. I offer a few ideas on this question, not providing a conclusive answer, but rather exploring some hypothesis and suggestions for further research. In order to do that, I divide my discussion in two parts. First, I quickly overview the substantive regulation of shareholders’ agreements in the United States, focusing in particular on Delaware law and on the Model Business Corporation Act. Second, I concentrate on the issue of the use – or, better, limited use – of shareholders’ agreements in listed corporations. I offer some new possible explanations for the limited use of these type of covenants in the United States.","PeriodicalId":309706,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Shareholders’ Agreements are Not Used in U.S. Listed Corporations: A Conundrum in Search of an Explanation\",\"authors\":\"Marco Ventoruzzo\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2246005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This short essay, prepared as the text of a talk for a conference on shareholders’ agreements, examines what I consider one of the most puzzling and overlooked issues of US corporate law and securities regulation. The issue is why agreements among shareholders are not often used as control enhancing devices among American listed corporations. I offer a few ideas on this question, not providing a conclusive answer, but rather exploring some hypothesis and suggestions for further research. In order to do that, I divide my discussion in two parts. First, I quickly overview the substantive regulation of shareholders’ agreements in the United States, focusing in particular on Delaware law and on the Model Business Corporation Act. Second, I concentrate on the issue of the use – or, better, limited use – of shareholders’ agreements in listed corporations. I offer some new possible explanations for the limited use of these type of covenants in the United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2246005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2246005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这篇短文是为一次股东协议会议的演讲准备的,探讨了我认为美国公司法和证券监管中最令人困惑、最被忽视的问题之一。问题在于,为什么在美国上市公司中,股东之间的协议不常被用作加强控制的手段。我对这个问题提出了一些想法,不是给出一个结论性的答案,而是探索一些假设和建议,以供进一步研究。为了做到这一点,我把我的讨论分为两个部分。首先,我将简要概述美国股东协议的实质性法规,重点介绍特拉华州法律和《示范商业公司法》。其次,我将重点讨论上市公司股东协议的使用问题——或者更好地说,是有限使用问题。对于这类契约在美国的有限使用,我提出了一些新的可能的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Shareholders’ Agreements are Not Used in U.S. Listed Corporations: A Conundrum in Search of an Explanation
This short essay, prepared as the text of a talk for a conference on shareholders’ agreements, examines what I consider one of the most puzzling and overlooked issues of US corporate law and securities regulation. The issue is why agreements among shareholders are not often used as control enhancing devices among American listed corporations. I offer a few ideas on this question, not providing a conclusive answer, but rather exploring some hypothesis and suggestions for further research. In order to do that, I divide my discussion in two parts. First, I quickly overview the substantive regulation of shareholders’ agreements in the United States, focusing in particular on Delaware law and on the Model Business Corporation Act. Second, I concentrate on the issue of the use – or, better, limited use – of shareholders’ agreements in listed corporations. I offer some new possible explanations for the limited use of these type of covenants in the United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信