KVM和Docker中虚拟化HTTP代理的性能评估

Rodrigo S. V. Eiras, R. S. Couto, M. Rubinstein
{"title":"KVM和Docker中虚拟化HTTP代理的性能评估","authors":"Rodrigo S. V. Eiras, R. S. Couto, M. Rubinstein","doi":"10.1109/NOF.2016.7810144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Network Function Virtualization (NFV) is a new paradigm in which network services are virtualized and can run in common and generic hardware, improving service agility and reducing costs. There are many factors that encourage NFV employment but some particular requirements must be carefully evaluated, such as choosing the virtualization technology. This paper provides a performance analysis of two open source virtualization solutions, KVM and Docker, in an HTTP proxy scenario. Our results show that Docker process HTTP requests in a lower time than KVM, due to its lightweight virtualization. Moreover, based on the results, we provide a broad discussion about each virtualization solution applied to NFV environments.","PeriodicalId":208097,"journal":{"name":"2016 7th International Conference on the Network of the Future (NOF)","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of a virtualized HTTP proxy in KVM and Docker\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo S. V. Eiras, R. S. Couto, M. Rubinstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NOF.2016.7810144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Network Function Virtualization (NFV) is a new paradigm in which network services are virtualized and can run in common and generic hardware, improving service agility and reducing costs. There are many factors that encourage NFV employment but some particular requirements must be carefully evaluated, such as choosing the virtualization technology. This paper provides a performance analysis of two open source virtualization solutions, KVM and Docker, in an HTTP proxy scenario. Our results show that Docker process HTTP requests in a lower time than KVM, due to its lightweight virtualization. Moreover, based on the results, we provide a broad discussion about each virtualization solution applied to NFV environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 7th International Conference on the Network of the Future (NOF)\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 7th International Conference on the Network of the Future (NOF)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NOF.2016.7810144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 7th International Conference on the Network of the Future (NOF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NOF.2016.7810144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

网络功能虚拟化(Network Function Virtualization, NFV)是一种新的范例,它将网络服务虚拟化,可以在通用和通用硬件上运行,从而提高业务敏捷性并降低成本。有许多因素鼓励NFV的应用,但必须仔细评估一些特定的要求,例如选择虚拟化技术。本文提供了两个开源虚拟化解决方案KVM和Docker在HTTP代理场景下的性能分析。我们的结果表明,由于轻量级虚拟化,Docker处理HTTP请求的时间比KVM短。此外,根据结果,我们对应用于NFV环境的每种虚拟化解决方案进行了广泛的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation of a virtualized HTTP proxy in KVM and Docker
Network Function Virtualization (NFV) is a new paradigm in which network services are virtualized and can run in common and generic hardware, improving service agility and reducing costs. There are many factors that encourage NFV employment but some particular requirements must be carefully evaluated, such as choosing the virtualization technology. This paper provides a performance analysis of two open source virtualization solutions, KVM and Docker, in an HTTP proxy scenario. Our results show that Docker process HTTP requests in a lower time than KVM, due to its lightweight virtualization. Moreover, based on the results, we provide a broad discussion about each virtualization solution applied to NFV environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信