结构维数和分形维数是大豆籽粒产量的可靠决定因素

A. Jaradat, D. Surek, D. Archer
{"title":"结构维数和分形维数是大豆籽粒产量的可靠决定因素","authors":"A. Jaradat, D. Surek, D. Archer","doi":"10.1109/PMA.2006.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soybean [Glycin max (L.) Merr.] plants grown under five management strategies differed significantly in their geometric structures, and were classified with 75 to 100% correct classification, based on differences in their fractal dimension (Do), midday differential canopy temperature (dT), and canopy light penetration [Log(UIo)]. Single soybean plants grown under a conventional system using moldboard tillage developed complex geometric structures, with significantly larger Do (1.477) values and grain yield (11.2 g per plant) as compared to plants grown under an organic system with strip tillage (Do =1.358, and grain yield = 2.32 g per plant). Across management strategies, Do of single plants was a function of stem perimeter, circularity, and volume, and plant dry weight; whereas grain yield m was a function of Do, plant dry weight and volume, and stem circularity. Knowledge of how plants respond to single and multiple management strategies will help agronomists develop better predictive models and will help farmers refine management practices to optimize yield.","PeriodicalId":315124,"journal":{"name":"2006 Second International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling and Applications","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural and Fractal Dimensions are Reliable Determinants of Grain Yield in Soybean\",\"authors\":\"A. Jaradat, D. Surek, D. Archer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PMA.2006.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soybean [Glycin max (L.) Merr.] plants grown under five management strategies differed significantly in their geometric structures, and were classified with 75 to 100% correct classification, based on differences in their fractal dimension (Do), midday differential canopy temperature (dT), and canopy light penetration [Log(UIo)]. Single soybean plants grown under a conventional system using moldboard tillage developed complex geometric structures, with significantly larger Do (1.477) values and grain yield (11.2 g per plant) as compared to plants grown under an organic system with strip tillage (Do =1.358, and grain yield = 2.32 g per plant). Across management strategies, Do of single plants was a function of stem perimeter, circularity, and volume, and plant dry weight; whereas grain yield m was a function of Do, plant dry weight and volume, and stem circularity. Knowledge of how plants respond to single and multiple management strategies will help agronomists develop better predictive models and will help farmers refine management practices to optimize yield.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 Second International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling and Applications\",\"volume\":\"156 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 Second International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PMA.2006.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 Second International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PMA.2006.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

大豆[Glycin max (L.)]稳定。5种管理策略下生长的植物在几何结构上存在显著差异,基于分形维数(Do)、正午冠层温差(dT)和冠层透光率[Log(UIo)]的差异,分类正确率为75% ~ 100%。常规模式下种植的单株大豆几何结构复杂,Do值(1.477)和籽粒产量(11.2 g /株)显著高于条带耕作有机系统(Do =1.358,籽粒产量= 2.32 g /株)。在不同的管理策略下,单个植株的Do是茎周长、圆度、体积和植株干重的函数;而籽粒产量m是Do、植株干重、干体积和茎圆度的函数。了解植物对单一和多种管理策略的反应将有助于农学家开发更好的预测模型,并将帮助农民改进管理实践以优化产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Structural and Fractal Dimensions are Reliable Determinants of Grain Yield in Soybean
Soybean [Glycin max (L.) Merr.] plants grown under five management strategies differed significantly in their geometric structures, and were classified with 75 to 100% correct classification, based on differences in their fractal dimension (Do), midday differential canopy temperature (dT), and canopy light penetration [Log(UIo)]. Single soybean plants grown under a conventional system using moldboard tillage developed complex geometric structures, with significantly larger Do (1.477) values and grain yield (11.2 g per plant) as compared to plants grown under an organic system with strip tillage (Do =1.358, and grain yield = 2.32 g per plant). Across management strategies, Do of single plants was a function of stem perimeter, circularity, and volume, and plant dry weight; whereas grain yield m was a function of Do, plant dry weight and volume, and stem circularity. Knowledge of how plants respond to single and multiple management strategies will help agronomists develop better predictive models and will help farmers refine management practices to optimize yield.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信