窄带PLC信道损伤下的SFSK与OFDM性能

S. Najjar, F. Rouissi, A. Vinck, H. Gassara, A. Ghazel
{"title":"窄带PLC信道损伤下的SFSK与OFDM性能","authors":"S. Najjar, F. Rouissi, A. Vinck, H. Gassara, A. Ghazel","doi":"10.1109/ICMCS.2018.8525990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we compare FSK, SFSK and OFDM modulation techniques performances, widely used for narrow band powerline communication systems. The signals are modulated using binary and quaternary mappings, then exposed to realistic measured narrowband PLC channel attenuation and noise. 4-SFSK proves to have the best BER performances, achieving BER lower than 10−5 under the channel effect for SNRs higher than 18 dB while OFDM-QPSK is limited to 10−3.","PeriodicalId":272255,"journal":{"name":"2018 6th International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SFSK versus OFDM Performances under the Narrowband PLC Channel Impairments\",\"authors\":\"S. Najjar, F. Rouissi, A. Vinck, H. Gassara, A. Ghazel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMCS.2018.8525990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we compare FSK, SFSK and OFDM modulation techniques performances, widely used for narrow band powerline communication systems. The signals are modulated using binary and quaternary mappings, then exposed to realistic measured narrowband PLC channel attenuation and noise. 4-SFSK proves to have the best BER performances, achieving BER lower than 10−5 under the channel effect for SNRs higher than 18 dB while OFDM-QPSK is limited to 10−3.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 6th International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS)\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 6th International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMCS.2018.8525990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 6th International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMCS.2018.8525990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文比较了在窄带电力线通信系统中广泛使用的FSK、SFSK和OFDM调制技术的性能。使用二进制和四元映射调制信号,然后暴露于实际测量的窄带PLC信道衰减和噪声。事实证明,4-SFSK具有最佳的误码率性能,在信噪比高于18 dB的信道效应下,误码率低于10−5,而OFDM-QPSK被限制在10−3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SFSK versus OFDM Performances under the Narrowband PLC Channel Impairments
In this paper, we compare FSK, SFSK and OFDM modulation techniques performances, widely used for narrow band powerline communication systems. The signals are modulated using binary and quaternary mappings, then exposed to realistic measured narrowband PLC channel attenuation and noise. 4-SFSK proves to have the best BER performances, achieving BER lower than 10−5 under the channel effect for SNRs higher than 18 dB while OFDM-QPSK is limited to 10−3.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信