利用电路的实验室实验促进数学的成就

N. Sabag, E. Trotskovsky
{"title":"利用电路的实验室实验促进数学的成就","authors":"N. Sabag, E. Trotskovsky","doi":"10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper describes the results of a study that compared the academic achievements of practical engineering students who learned about complex numbers through traditional lectures and in lab experiments using basic AC circuits with those of students who attended the same lectures but whose exercises were the standard ones-in a classroom using chalk on a blackboard. The final examination, immediately after studying the complex numbers unit, showed a small, but not significant gap between the two groups, with the experimental group's grades slightly higher than the control group. In a test given four months later, this gap widened to about 16 points on average for the experimental group-a significant difference. This difference can be attributed to the contribution of the laboratory experiments that required the experimental group members to engage in active learning, thereby heightening their knowledge construction. The students' allocation to the control and experimental groups was at random.","PeriodicalId":297233,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using lab experiments in electric circuits to promote achievements in mathematics\",\"authors\":\"N. Sabag, E. Trotskovsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper describes the results of a study that compared the academic achievements of practical engineering students who learned about complex numbers through traditional lectures and in lab experiments using basic AC circuits with those of students who attended the same lectures but whose exercises were the standard ones-in a classroom using chalk on a blackboard. The final examination, immediately after studying the complex numbers unit, showed a small, but not significant gap between the two groups, with the experimental group's grades slightly higher than the control group. In a test given four months later, this gap widened to about 16 points on average for the experimental group-a significant difference. This difference can be attributed to the contribution of the laboratory experiments that required the experimental group members to engage in active learning, thereby heightening their knowledge construction. The students' allocation to the control and experimental groups was at random.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)\",\"volume\":\"138 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

这篇论文描述了一项研究的结果,该研究比较了通过传统课程和使用基本交流电路的实验室实验学习复数的实用工程专业学生与参加相同课程但使用标准练习(在教室里用粉笔在黑板上练习)的学生的学术成就。在学习完复数单元后的期末考试中,两组学生的成绩差距不大,但并不显著,实验组的成绩略高于对照组。在四个月后的测试中,实验组的平均差距扩大到约16分——这是一个显著的差异。这种差异可以归因于实验室实验的贡献,它要求实验组成员积极学习,从而加强了他们的知识建构。学生被随机分配到对照组和实验组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using lab experiments in electric circuits to promote achievements in mathematics
The paper describes the results of a study that compared the academic achievements of practical engineering students who learned about complex numbers through traditional lectures and in lab experiments using basic AC circuits with those of students who attended the same lectures but whose exercises were the standard ones-in a classroom using chalk on a blackboard. The final examination, immediately after studying the complex numbers unit, showed a small, but not significant gap between the two groups, with the experimental group's grades slightly higher than the control group. In a test given four months later, this gap widened to about 16 points on average for the experimental group-a significant difference. This difference can be attributed to the contribution of the laboratory experiments that required the experimental group members to engage in active learning, thereby heightening their knowledge construction. The students' allocation to the control and experimental groups was at random.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信