基于邻接的政治区划优化模型

M. Kim, N. Xiao
{"title":"基于邻接的政治区划优化模型","authors":"M. Kim, N. Xiao","doi":"10.4018/IJAGR.2017100101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Politicalredistrictingisaprocessusedtoredrawpoliticalboundariesbasedonanumberofcriteria thatincludepopulationequality,minorityrepresentation,contiguity,andcompactness.Redistricting planscanbedifficulttodrawmanuallyandsincethe1970stheuseofcomputersinthecreationof redistrictingplanshasincreaseddramatically.Thepurposeofthispaperistoformulatetheproblemof findingredistrictingplansasoptimizationproblemsonthebasisofpopulationequalityandcontiguity. Theauthorsspecificallyaddresstheproblemfromthecontiguityperspective.Theydevelopedtwo exactoptimalmodels:onebasedonaminimumspanningtreeandonebasedonnetworkflows.They discussthespatialrepresentationandtheformulationofcontiguityforbothmodelsandcompare theperformanceofthesetwomodels,alongwithathirdmodeldevelopedintheliterature,usinga varietyofsyntheticandrealdata.Theauthors’resultsconfirmthatsuchaproblemiscomputationally intensive and more efficient methods are needed for large size problems, but with appropriate formulationapproachestheycanobtainusefulbaselinesolutionstotheseproblemswithrelatively smallsize.Theyalsofindthatmultipleoptimalsolutionswithdifferentspatialconfigurationsmay existforthesameproblem,whichpresentsanewchallengetothedevelopmentofsolutionmethods forpoliticalredistrictingproblems. KeywORdS Land Acquisition Problems, Political Redistricting Problems, Spatial Contiguity, Spatial Optimization, Strict Equal Population","PeriodicalId":368300,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Appl. Geospat. Res.","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contiguity-Based Optimization Models for Political Redistricting Problems\",\"authors\":\"M. Kim, N. Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/IJAGR.2017100101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Politicalredistrictingisaprocessusedtoredrawpoliticalboundariesbasedonanumberofcriteria thatincludepopulationequality,minorityrepresentation,contiguity,andcompactness.Redistricting planscanbedifficulttodrawmanuallyandsincethe1970stheuseofcomputersinthecreationof redistrictingplanshasincreaseddramatically.Thepurposeofthispaperistoformulatetheproblemof findingredistrictingplansasoptimizationproblemsonthebasisofpopulationequalityandcontiguity. Theauthorsspecificallyaddresstheproblemfromthecontiguityperspective.Theydevelopedtwo exactoptimalmodels:onebasedonaminimumspanningtreeandonebasedonnetworkflows.They discussthespatialrepresentationandtheformulationofcontiguityforbothmodelsandcompare theperformanceofthesetwomodels,alongwithathirdmodeldevelopedintheliterature,usinga varietyofsyntheticandrealdata.Theauthors’resultsconfirmthatsuchaproblemiscomputationally intensive and more efficient methods are needed for large size problems, but with appropriate formulationapproachestheycanobtainusefulbaselinesolutionstotheseproblemswithrelatively smallsize.Theyalsofindthatmultipleoptimalsolutionswithdifferentspatialconfigurationsmay existforthesameproblem,whichpresentsanewchallengetothedevelopmentofsolutionmethods forpoliticalredistrictingproblems. KeywORdS Land Acquisition Problems, Political Redistricting Problems, Spatial Contiguity, Spatial Optimization, Strict Equal Population\",\"PeriodicalId\":368300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Appl. Geospat. Res.\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Appl. Geospat. Res.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJAGR.2017100101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Appl. Geospat. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJAGR.2017100101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

Politicalredistrictingisaprocessusedtoredrawpoliticalboundariesbasedonanumberofcriteria thatincludepopulationequality,minorityrepresentation,contiguity,andcompactness。Redistricting planscanbedifficulttodrawmanuallyandsincethe1970stheuseofcomputersinthecreationof redistrictingplanshasincreaseddramatically。Thepurposeofthispaperistoformulatetheproblemof findingredistrictingplansasoptimizationproblemsonthebasisofpopulationequalityandcontiguity。Theauthorsspecificallyaddresstheproblemfromthecontiguityperspective。Theydevelopedtwo exactoptimalmodels:onebasedonaminimumspanningtreeandonebasedonnetworkflows。They discussthespatialrepresentationandtheformulationofcontiguityforbothmodelsandcompare theperformanceofthesetwomodels,alongwithathirdmodeldevelopedintheliterature,usinga varietyofsyntheticandrealdata。Theauthors ' ' resultsconfirmthatsuchaproblemiscomputationally ' '需要' '密集' '和' '更有效' '的方法' '对于' '大' '尺寸' '的问题,' '需要' '适当' ' formulationapproachestheycanobtainusefulbaselinesolutionstotheseproblemswithrelatively smallsize。'Theyalsofindthatmultipleoptimalsolutionswithdifferentspatialconfigurationsmay existforthesameproblem,whichpresentsanewchallengetothedevelopmentofsolutionmethods forpoliticalredistrictingproblems。关键词征地问题,政治区划问题,空间连续性,空间优化,严格人口均等
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contiguity-Based Optimization Models for Political Redistricting Problems
Politicalredistrictingisaprocessusedtoredrawpoliticalboundariesbasedonanumberofcriteria thatincludepopulationequality,minorityrepresentation,contiguity,andcompactness.Redistricting planscanbedifficulttodrawmanuallyandsincethe1970stheuseofcomputersinthecreationof redistrictingplanshasincreaseddramatically.Thepurposeofthispaperistoformulatetheproblemof findingredistrictingplansasoptimizationproblemsonthebasisofpopulationequalityandcontiguity. Theauthorsspecificallyaddresstheproblemfromthecontiguityperspective.Theydevelopedtwo exactoptimalmodels:onebasedonaminimumspanningtreeandonebasedonnetworkflows.They discussthespatialrepresentationandtheformulationofcontiguityforbothmodelsandcompare theperformanceofthesetwomodels,alongwithathirdmodeldevelopedintheliterature,usinga varietyofsyntheticandrealdata.Theauthors’resultsconfirmthatsuchaproblemiscomputationally intensive and more efficient methods are needed for large size problems, but with appropriate formulationapproachestheycanobtainusefulbaselinesolutionstotheseproblemswithrelatively smallsize.Theyalsofindthatmultipleoptimalsolutionswithdifferentspatialconfigurationsmay existforthesameproblem,whichpresentsanewchallengetothedevelopmentofsolutionmethods forpoliticalredistrictingproblems. KeywORdS Land Acquisition Problems, Political Redistricting Problems, Spatial Contiguity, Spatial Optimization, Strict Equal Population
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信