{"title":"从五年级学生批判性思维能力的教学考察PBL模式与TPS的有效性","authors":"Elza Pristy Latifah, W. Wahyudi, Yohana Setiawan","doi":"10.26858/JDS.V7I2.9813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in effectiveness of PBL learning models with TPS in terms of the critical thinking skills of elementary school students in mathematics. This research is a quasi-experimental study. In this study, the Non-equivalent Control Group Design design is used to investigate the effects of the two variables used. In this study 19 students at Bacem Elementary School and 19 students at Waru Elementary School, Jepon District, Blora Regency. The two groups were given different treatments, namely the PBL learning model was treated in the experimental group at Bacem SDN, and the TPS model was treated in the control group at Waru Elementary School. Based on the results of the study, H_oditotak and H_a were accepted. The analysis in this study used the Ngain test to determine the increase in the average value of the results of the pretest and posttest. This is based on the results of the NGain analysis showing an increase in value after being given PBL treatment of 0.64, while the increase in value after being given TPS treatment was 0.53. Based on all analysis results, it can be concluded that there are significant differences in effectiveness in this study. Evidently the application of PBL learning models has a higher level of effectiveness when compared to the TPS learning model of the critical thinking skills of fifth grade students in mathematics","PeriodicalId":123617,"journal":{"name":"Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"251 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PBL MODEL WITH THE TPS REVIEWED FROM CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY OF GRADE 5 STUDENTS IN MATHEMATICS TEACHING\",\"authors\":\"Elza Pristy Latifah, W. Wahyudi, Yohana Setiawan\",\"doi\":\"10.26858/JDS.V7I2.9813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in effectiveness of PBL learning models with TPS in terms of the critical thinking skills of elementary school students in mathematics. This research is a quasi-experimental study. In this study, the Non-equivalent Control Group Design design is used to investigate the effects of the two variables used. In this study 19 students at Bacem Elementary School and 19 students at Waru Elementary School, Jepon District, Blora Regency. The two groups were given different treatments, namely the PBL learning model was treated in the experimental group at Bacem SDN, and the TPS model was treated in the control group at Waru Elementary School. Based on the results of the study, H_oditotak and H_a were accepted. The analysis in this study used the Ngain test to determine the increase in the average value of the results of the pretest and posttest. This is based on the results of the NGain analysis showing an increase in value after being given PBL treatment of 0.64, while the increase in value after being given TPS treatment was 0.53. Based on all analysis results, it can be concluded that there are significant differences in effectiveness in this study. Evidently the application of PBL learning models has a higher level of effectiveness when compared to the TPS learning model of the critical thinking skills of fifth grade students in mathematics\",\"PeriodicalId\":123617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika\",\"volume\":\"251 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26858/JDS.V7I2.9813\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26858/JDS.V7I2.9813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本研究旨在探讨PBL学习模式与TPS对小学生数学批判性思维能力的影响。本研究是一项准实验研究。本研究采用非等效控制组设计(Non-equivalent Control Group Design)来考察两个变量的影响。在这项研究中,19名学生Bacem小学和19名学生Waru小学,Jepon区,布洛拉县。两组采用不同的治疗方法,实验组在Bacem SDN采用PBL学习模式,对照组在Waru小学采用TPS学习模式。根据研究结果,H_oditotak和H_a被接受。本研究的分析使用Ngain检验来确定前测和后测结果的平均值的增加。这是基于NGain分析结果显示,给予PBL治疗后的值增加了0.64,而给予TPS治疗后的值增加了0.53。综合所有分析结果,可以得出结论,本研究的有效性存在显著差异。与TPS学习模式相比,PBL学习模式在五年级学生数学批判性思维技能学习中具有更高的有效性
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PBL MODEL WITH THE TPS REVIEWED FROM CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY OF GRADE 5 STUDENTS IN MATHEMATICS TEACHING
The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in effectiveness of PBL learning models with TPS in terms of the critical thinking skills of elementary school students in mathematics. This research is a quasi-experimental study. In this study, the Non-equivalent Control Group Design design is used to investigate the effects of the two variables used. In this study 19 students at Bacem Elementary School and 19 students at Waru Elementary School, Jepon District, Blora Regency. The two groups were given different treatments, namely the PBL learning model was treated in the experimental group at Bacem SDN, and the TPS model was treated in the control group at Waru Elementary School. Based on the results of the study, H_oditotak and H_a were accepted. The analysis in this study used the Ngain test to determine the increase in the average value of the results of the pretest and posttest. This is based on the results of the NGain analysis showing an increase in value after being given PBL treatment of 0.64, while the increase in value after being given TPS treatment was 0.53. Based on all analysis results, it can be concluded that there are significant differences in effectiveness in this study. Evidently the application of PBL learning models has a higher level of effectiveness when compared to the TPS learning model of the critical thinking skills of fifth grade students in mathematics