公法与政治自治:一个材料批判

Michael A. Wilkinson
{"title":"公法与政治自治:一个材料批判","authors":"Michael A. Wilkinson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3063210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern public law, according to Martin Loughlin’s Foundations of Public Law, depends upon the autonomy of the political realm. This is explained on the basis of an orthodox secularisation thesis of modernity, the autonomy of the political emerging through its successful separation from the theological. But when viewed in relation to the economic (the material realm), the autonomy of political ordering looks more fragile, subject to the continuing struggle between democracy and capitalism. The concrete features of this struggle are explored by way of a stylised diachronic overview of the transformation of the Western European state and regional state-system in the twentieth century, first with the interwar breakdown of political order, then with postwar reconstruction in the project of European integration. In the recent Euro-crisis phase it again enters a critical period. All of this, however, escapes the lens of a purely political jurisprudence.","PeriodicalId":117557,"journal":{"name":"LSE Legal Studies Working Paper Series","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Law and the Autonomy of the Political: A Material Critique\",\"authors\":\"Michael A. Wilkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3063210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modern public law, according to Martin Loughlin’s Foundations of Public Law, depends upon the autonomy of the political realm. This is explained on the basis of an orthodox secularisation thesis of modernity, the autonomy of the political emerging through its successful separation from the theological. But when viewed in relation to the economic (the material realm), the autonomy of political ordering looks more fragile, subject to the continuing struggle between democracy and capitalism. The concrete features of this struggle are explored by way of a stylised diachronic overview of the transformation of the Western European state and regional state-system in the twentieth century, first with the interwar breakdown of political order, then with postwar reconstruction in the project of European integration. In the recent Euro-crisis phase it again enters a critical period. All of this, however, escapes the lens of a purely political jurisprudence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSE Legal Studies Working Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSE Legal Studies Working Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3063210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSE Legal Studies Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3063210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

根据Martin Loughlin的《公法基础》,现代公法依赖于政治领域的自治。这是在现代性的正统世俗化论点的基础上解释的,政治的自主性通过它与神学的成功分离而出现。但与经济(物质领域)相比,政治秩序的自主性似乎更加脆弱,受制于民主与资本主义之间的持续斗争。通过对20世纪西欧国家和地区国家体系转型的风格化历时性概述,首先是两次世界大战之间政治秩序的崩溃,然后是战后欧洲一体化项目中的重建,探索了这场斗争的具体特征。在最近的欧元危机阶段,它再次进入了一个关键时期。然而,所有这些都脱离了纯粹政治法学的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public Law and the Autonomy of the Political: A Material Critique
Modern public law, according to Martin Loughlin’s Foundations of Public Law, depends upon the autonomy of the political realm. This is explained on the basis of an orthodox secularisation thesis of modernity, the autonomy of the political emerging through its successful separation from the theological. But when viewed in relation to the economic (the material realm), the autonomy of political ordering looks more fragile, subject to the continuing struggle between democracy and capitalism. The concrete features of this struggle are explored by way of a stylised diachronic overview of the transformation of the Western European state and regional state-system in the twentieth century, first with the interwar breakdown of political order, then with postwar reconstruction in the project of European integration. In the recent Euro-crisis phase it again enters a critical period. All of this, however, escapes the lens of a purely political jurisprudence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信