耶稣复活的奇异性

M. Levering
{"title":"耶稣复活的奇异性","authors":"M. Levering","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198838968.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The strangeness of the New Testament testimony to Jesus’ Resurrection has led people to seek alternative explanations for this testimony than the explanation offered by the New Testament. This chapter first discusses contemporary ways of explaining away the New Testament’s claim that Jesus concretely manifested himself in his risen flesh to his disciples. Second, the chapter examines the intrinsic strangeness of the New Testament claim that Jesus’ corpse was raised from the dead to glorified life. Third, the chapter engages Thomas Aquinas’s theology of the Resurrection of Jesus. Aquinas rejects any spiritualizing of the raising of Jesus’ corpse to glorified life. His discussion draws upon John of Damascus’s On the Orthodox Faith as an important patristic witness to the bodiliness of the Resurrection of Jesus. Damascene is aware of Gnostic and Muslim perspectives that spiritualized Jesus’ death and Resurrection, and the chapter briefly surveys a number of these perspectives.","PeriodicalId":328876,"journal":{"name":"Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Strangeness of Jesus’ Resurrection\",\"authors\":\"M. Levering\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780198838968.003.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The strangeness of the New Testament testimony to Jesus’ Resurrection has led people to seek alternative explanations for this testimony than the explanation offered by the New Testament. This chapter first discusses contemporary ways of explaining away the New Testament’s claim that Jesus concretely manifested himself in his risen flesh to his disciples. Second, the chapter examines the intrinsic strangeness of the New Testament claim that Jesus’ corpse was raised from the dead to glorified life. Third, the chapter engages Thomas Aquinas’s theology of the Resurrection of Jesus. Aquinas rejects any spiritualizing of the raising of Jesus’ corpse to glorified life. His discussion draws upon John of Damascus’s On the Orthodox Faith as an important patristic witness to the bodiliness of the Resurrection of Jesus. Damascene is aware of Gnostic and Muslim perspectives that spiritualized Jesus’ death and Resurrection, and the chapter briefly surveys a number of these perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198838968.003.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198838968.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新约圣经中对耶稣复活的奇怪见证,导致人们寻找其他的解释,而不是新约圣经提供的解释。本章首先讨论当代解释新约中关于耶稣以复活的肉身具体向门徒显现的说法的方法。第二,本章考察了新约圣经声称耶稣的尸体从死里复活到荣耀生命的内在奇怪之处。第三,本章涉及托马斯·阿奎那关于耶稣复活的神学。阿奎那拒绝任何将耶稣的尸体复活为荣耀生命的灵性化。他的讨论借鉴了大马士革约翰的《论东正教信仰》,将其作为见证耶稣肉身复活的重要教父著作。大马士革意识到诺斯底派和穆斯林的观点将耶稣的死亡和复活精神化了,本章简要地调查了这些观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Strangeness of Jesus’ Resurrection
The strangeness of the New Testament testimony to Jesus’ Resurrection has led people to seek alternative explanations for this testimony than the explanation offered by the New Testament. This chapter first discusses contemporary ways of explaining away the New Testament’s claim that Jesus concretely manifested himself in his risen flesh to his disciples. Second, the chapter examines the intrinsic strangeness of the New Testament claim that Jesus’ corpse was raised from the dead to glorified life. Third, the chapter engages Thomas Aquinas’s theology of the Resurrection of Jesus. Aquinas rejects any spiritualizing of the raising of Jesus’ corpse to glorified life. His discussion draws upon John of Damascus’s On the Orthodox Faith as an important patristic witness to the bodiliness of the Resurrection of Jesus. Damascene is aware of Gnostic and Muslim perspectives that spiritualized Jesus’ death and Resurrection, and the chapter briefly surveys a number of these perspectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信