同种异体造血干细胞移植术后复发的发生率及治疗

Nikola Lemajić, M. Todorovic-Balint, Nikola Peulić
{"title":"同种异体造血干细胞移植术后复发的发生率及治疗","authors":"Nikola Lemajić, M. Todorovic-Balint, Nikola Peulić","doi":"10.5937/smclk3-39626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/Aim: Disease relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is one of the most common and most severe post transplantation complications and represents the leading cause of treatment failure and patient death. The aim of this study is to assess the frequency and types of relapse, in relation to the time of occurrence; analyze the influence of conditioning regimens on relapse occurrence; review the therapeutic options after the occurrence of relapse; assess the prognosis in patients with relapse. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 58 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Pre-transplantation therapy was performed with a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (RIC) or a myeloablative regimen (MAC). The diagnosis of relapse was made through myelogram analysis, analysis of cytogenetics, analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD), analysis of cellular chimerism, and analysis of immunohematological chimerism of blood group antigens. A database was formed in relation to the examined patient characteristics. Patient survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rang test. Results: MAC (43 patients) was used more frequently than RIC (15 patients), as a conditioning regimen. After transplantation, 18 (34%) out of 53 patients had a relapse. The choice of regimen did not affect the occurrence of relapse, but patients on the RIC regimen lived longer (38.5 ± 7 months) as compared to patients on the MAC regimen (27.8 ± 3.5 months). However, the difference in survival was without statistical significance (p = 0.318). The median survival time of patients who relapsed was 26 ± 5 months, while patients without disease relapse had a median survival time of 41 ± 4 months. Conclusion: Patients who received reduced-intensity regimens (RIC) had a longer survival time, without an increase in the relapse rate. In future, consideration should be given to the inclusion of patients older than 60 years, as candidates for transplantation, as well as to the possible use of prophylactic therapy aimed at preventing relapse in high-risk patients.","PeriodicalId":286220,"journal":{"name":"Srpski medicinski casopis Lekarske komore","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and therapy of relapse after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Nikola Lemajić, M. Todorovic-Balint, Nikola Peulić\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/smclk3-39626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction/Aim: Disease relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is one of the most common and most severe post transplantation complications and represents the leading cause of treatment failure and patient death. The aim of this study is to assess the frequency and types of relapse, in relation to the time of occurrence; analyze the influence of conditioning regimens on relapse occurrence; review the therapeutic options after the occurrence of relapse; assess the prognosis in patients with relapse. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 58 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Pre-transplantation therapy was performed with a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (RIC) or a myeloablative regimen (MAC). The diagnosis of relapse was made through myelogram analysis, analysis of cytogenetics, analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD), analysis of cellular chimerism, and analysis of immunohematological chimerism of blood group antigens. A database was formed in relation to the examined patient characteristics. Patient survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rang test. Results: MAC (43 patients) was used more frequently than RIC (15 patients), as a conditioning regimen. After transplantation, 18 (34%) out of 53 patients had a relapse. The choice of regimen did not affect the occurrence of relapse, but patients on the RIC regimen lived longer (38.5 ± 7 months) as compared to patients on the MAC regimen (27.8 ± 3.5 months). However, the difference in survival was without statistical significance (p = 0.318). The median survival time of patients who relapsed was 26 ± 5 months, while patients without disease relapse had a median survival time of 41 ± 4 months. Conclusion: Patients who received reduced-intensity regimens (RIC) had a longer survival time, without an increase in the relapse rate. In future, consideration should be given to the inclusion of patients older than 60 years, as candidates for transplantation, as well as to the possible use of prophylactic therapy aimed at preventing relapse in high-risk patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Srpski medicinski casopis Lekarske komore\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Srpski medicinski casopis Lekarske komore\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/smclk3-39626\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Srpski medicinski casopis Lekarske komore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/smclk3-39626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

异体造血干细胞移植后疾病复发是移植后最常见和最严重的并发症之一,是导致治疗失败和患者死亡的主要原因。本研究的目的是评估复发的频率和类型,与发生的时间有关;分析调理方案对复发的影响;回顾复发后的治疗方案;评估复发患者的预后。方法:这项回顾性队列研究包括58例接受同种异体造血干细胞移植(alloo - hsct)的患者。移植前治疗采用低强度调节方案(RIC)或清髓方案(MAC)。通过骨髓学分析、细胞遗传学分析、微量残留病(MRD)分析、细胞嵌合分析、血型抗原免疫血液学嵌合分析,诊断复发。建立了与所检查患者特征相关的数据库。采用Kaplan-Meier法和对数距检验分析患者生存。结果:作为一种调节方案,MAC(43例)比RIC(15例)使用频率更高。移植后,53例患者中有18例(34%)复发。方案的选择不影响复发的发生,但RIC方案患者的生存时间(38.5±7个月)比MAC方案患者的生存时间(27.8±3.5个月)更长。两组生存率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.318)。复发患者的中位生存时间为26±5个月,无疾病复发患者的中位生存时间为41±4个月。结论:接受低强度方案(RIC)的患者生存时间更长,复发率未增加。未来,应考虑纳入60岁以上的患者作为移植的候选者,以及可能使用旨在防止高危患者复发的预防性治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence and therapy of relapse after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Introduction/Aim: Disease relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is one of the most common and most severe post transplantation complications and represents the leading cause of treatment failure and patient death. The aim of this study is to assess the frequency and types of relapse, in relation to the time of occurrence; analyze the influence of conditioning regimens on relapse occurrence; review the therapeutic options after the occurrence of relapse; assess the prognosis in patients with relapse. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 58 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Pre-transplantation therapy was performed with a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (RIC) or a myeloablative regimen (MAC). The diagnosis of relapse was made through myelogram analysis, analysis of cytogenetics, analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD), analysis of cellular chimerism, and analysis of immunohematological chimerism of blood group antigens. A database was formed in relation to the examined patient characteristics. Patient survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rang test. Results: MAC (43 patients) was used more frequently than RIC (15 patients), as a conditioning regimen. After transplantation, 18 (34%) out of 53 patients had a relapse. The choice of regimen did not affect the occurrence of relapse, but patients on the RIC regimen lived longer (38.5 ± 7 months) as compared to patients on the MAC regimen (27.8 ± 3.5 months). However, the difference in survival was without statistical significance (p = 0.318). The median survival time of patients who relapsed was 26 ± 5 months, while patients without disease relapse had a median survival time of 41 ± 4 months. Conclusion: Patients who received reduced-intensity regimens (RIC) had a longer survival time, without an increase in the relapse rate. In future, consideration should be given to the inclusion of patients older than 60 years, as candidates for transplantation, as well as to the possible use of prophylactic therapy aimed at preventing relapse in high-risk patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信