通过分级提高学生积极性

Scott Spurlock
{"title":"通过分级提高学生积极性","authors":"Scott Spurlock","doi":"10.1145/3545945.3569747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent interest in alternative grading strategies has been increasing in the Computer Science Education community. The umbrella term ungrading has been used to refer to a variety of practices that de-emphasize numeric grades. In this paper we present the results of implementing an ungrading scheme that eliminates numeric grades, allows resubmission of assignments, and encourages student input into their final assigned letter grade. We administered surveys measuring student attitudes and motivation at the start and end of three different upper level Computer Science elective courses using the new grading scheme and found a significant increase in students' feelings of intrinsic goal orientation (valuing coursework for its own sake), self-efficacy (feeling able to be successful), and control of learning (taking responsibility for their own learning). We observed that, given the opportunity, most students chose to redo only a small number of assignments, and most students requested final grades within a half-letter of the instructor's estimate. Overall, compared with prior iterations of the courses that were graded traditionally, the final grade point average did not significantly increase, while students' reported level of effort did significantly increase. Comments on post-course surveys indicate that students liked the new grading scheme, and they reported improved learning and reduced anxiety.","PeriodicalId":371326,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Student Motivation by Ungrading\",\"authors\":\"Scott Spurlock\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3545945.3569747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent interest in alternative grading strategies has been increasing in the Computer Science Education community. The umbrella term ungrading has been used to refer to a variety of practices that de-emphasize numeric grades. In this paper we present the results of implementing an ungrading scheme that eliminates numeric grades, allows resubmission of assignments, and encourages student input into their final assigned letter grade. We administered surveys measuring student attitudes and motivation at the start and end of three different upper level Computer Science elective courses using the new grading scheme and found a significant increase in students' feelings of intrinsic goal orientation (valuing coursework for its own sake), self-efficacy (feeling able to be successful), and control of learning (taking responsibility for their own learning). We observed that, given the opportunity, most students chose to redo only a small number of assignments, and most students requested final grades within a half-letter of the instructor's estimate. Overall, compared with prior iterations of the courses that were graded traditionally, the final grade point average did not significantly increase, while students' reported level of effort did significantly increase. Comments on post-course surveys indicate that students liked the new grading scheme, and they reported improved learning and reduced anxiety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569747\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

最近,计算机科学教育界对替代评分策略的兴趣越来越大。不评分这个总称已经被用来指各种不强调数字分数的做法。在本文中,我们介绍了实施一种取消数字分数的方案的结果,该方案允许重新提交作业,并鼓励学生输入他们最终指定的字母分数。我们使用新的评分方案,在三个不同的高级计算机科学选修课程开始和结束时,对学生的态度和动机进行了调查,发现学生的内在目标取向(为了自己的利益而重视课程)、自我效能感(感觉能够成功)和学习控制(对自己的学习负责)的感觉显著增加。我们观察到,如果有机会,大多数学生只选择重做少量的作业,大多数学生要求的最终成绩在导师估计的半个字母以内。总的来说,与以前按传统方式评分的课程相比,最终的平均成绩没有显著提高,而学生报告的努力程度却显著提高。课后调查的评论表明,学生们喜欢新的评分方案,他们表示学习成绩有所提高,焦虑也有所减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Student Motivation by Ungrading
Recent interest in alternative grading strategies has been increasing in the Computer Science Education community. The umbrella term ungrading has been used to refer to a variety of practices that de-emphasize numeric grades. In this paper we present the results of implementing an ungrading scheme that eliminates numeric grades, allows resubmission of assignments, and encourages student input into their final assigned letter grade. We administered surveys measuring student attitudes and motivation at the start and end of three different upper level Computer Science elective courses using the new grading scheme and found a significant increase in students' feelings of intrinsic goal orientation (valuing coursework for its own sake), self-efficacy (feeling able to be successful), and control of learning (taking responsibility for their own learning). We observed that, given the opportunity, most students chose to redo only a small number of assignments, and most students requested final grades within a half-letter of the instructor's estimate. Overall, compared with prior iterations of the courses that were graded traditionally, the final grade point average did not significantly increase, while students' reported level of effort did significantly increase. Comments on post-course surveys indicate that students liked the new grading scheme, and they reported improved learning and reduced anxiety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信