公共和学术图书馆员对图书馆目录必要变更的意见

Katarina Švab
{"title":"公共和学术图书馆员对图书馆目录必要变更的意见","authors":"Katarina Švab","doi":"10.55741/knj.62.3.13803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Librarians as creators of the library catalogue should incorporate users’ needs into the library catalogue, however, they are limited by cataloguing rules and practices. Nevertheless, it is crucial to know the needs and difficulties as noticed by librarians in reference interviews.Methodology/approach: Interviews focusing on the issues of current library catalogues and needed changes were carried out with six (6) librarians from public libraries and ten (10) librarians from academic libraries who interact with users daily. The research was conducted in April 2014 and July 2017 in public and academic libraries.Results: The results identify difficulties encountered by librarians in reference interviews. The interviewees have highlighted the problem of different versions of library materials as well as the relative importance of attributes and relationships, which should be included in bibliographic records, and have described their views on current cataloguing rules.Research limitations: The limitation of the research is the convenience sample.Originality/practical implications: The results are important for creators of bibliographic records and authors of new cataloguing rules. They can set the basis for future research and reflection on the enrichment of library catalogues in the framework of current cataloguing practices as well as in the development of new generations of library catalogues, which will be based on different cataloguing rules.","PeriodicalId":387656,"journal":{"name":"Knjižnica: revija za področje bibliotekarstva in informacijske znanosti","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The opinion of public and academic librarians on the necessary changes in the library catalogue\",\"authors\":\"Katarina Švab\",\"doi\":\"10.55741/knj.62.3.13803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Librarians as creators of the library catalogue should incorporate users’ needs into the library catalogue, however, they are limited by cataloguing rules and practices. Nevertheless, it is crucial to know the needs and difficulties as noticed by librarians in reference interviews.Methodology/approach: Interviews focusing on the issues of current library catalogues and needed changes were carried out with six (6) librarians from public libraries and ten (10) librarians from academic libraries who interact with users daily. The research was conducted in April 2014 and July 2017 in public and academic libraries.Results: The results identify difficulties encountered by librarians in reference interviews. The interviewees have highlighted the problem of different versions of library materials as well as the relative importance of attributes and relationships, which should be included in bibliographic records, and have described their views on current cataloguing rules.Research limitations: The limitation of the research is the convenience sample.Originality/practical implications: The results are important for creators of bibliographic records and authors of new cataloguing rules. They can set the basis for future research and reflection on the enrichment of library catalogues in the framework of current cataloguing practices as well as in the development of new generations of library catalogues, which will be based on different cataloguing rules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knjižnica: revija za področje bibliotekarstva in informacijske znanosti\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knjižnica: revija za področje bibliotekarstva in informacijske znanosti\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55741/knj.62.3.13803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knjižnica: revija za področje bibliotekarstva in informacijske znanosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55741/knj.62.3.13803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:图书馆员作为图书馆目录的创造者,应该将用户的需求纳入图书馆目录,然而,他们受到编目规则和惯例的限制。然而,了解图书馆员在参考采访中注意到的需求和困难是至关重要的。方法/方法:对来自公共图书馆的六(6)名图书馆员和来自学术图书馆的十(10)名图书馆员进行了访谈,重点是当前图书馆目录的问题和需要的改变,他们每天与用户互动。该研究于2014年4月和2017年7月在公共图书馆和学术图书馆进行。结果:结果确定了图书馆员在参考采访中遇到的困难。受访者强调了图书馆资料版本不同的问题,以及书目记录中应包括的属性和关系的相对重要性,并阐述了他们对现行编目规则的看法。研究局限性:本研究的局限性在于使用了方便样本。原创性/实际意义:这些结果对书目记录的创造者和新编目规则的作者很重要。它们可以为今后在现行编目实践的框架内对图书馆目录的丰富进行研究和思考,以及在不同编目规则的基础上开发新一代图书馆目录奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The opinion of public and academic librarians on the necessary changes in the library catalogue
Purpose: Librarians as creators of the library catalogue should incorporate users’ needs into the library catalogue, however, they are limited by cataloguing rules and practices. Nevertheless, it is crucial to know the needs and difficulties as noticed by librarians in reference interviews.Methodology/approach: Interviews focusing on the issues of current library catalogues and needed changes were carried out with six (6) librarians from public libraries and ten (10) librarians from academic libraries who interact with users daily. The research was conducted in April 2014 and July 2017 in public and academic libraries.Results: The results identify difficulties encountered by librarians in reference interviews. The interviewees have highlighted the problem of different versions of library materials as well as the relative importance of attributes and relationships, which should be included in bibliographic records, and have described their views on current cataloguing rules.Research limitations: The limitation of the research is the convenience sample.Originality/practical implications: The results are important for creators of bibliographic records and authors of new cataloguing rules. They can set the basis for future research and reflection on the enrichment of library catalogues in the framework of current cataloguing practices as well as in the development of new generations of library catalogues, which will be based on different cataloguing rules.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信